Case law

State v. Brown

2014 Ohio 2988 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 2014

[Cite as State v. Brown, 2014-Ohio-2988.] … See State v. Brown, 136 Ohio St.3d 1512, 2013-Ohio-4657, 995 N.E.2d 1214 and 137 Ohio St.3d 1462, 2013-Ohio-4657.

Brown v. State

611 So. 2d 1376 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 10, 1993

Cleveland v. State, 587 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1991). On remand the court shall strike the latter conviction and recalculate the scoresheet. We affirm in all other respects.

Brown v. State

795 So. 2d 178 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 11, 2001

McKinney v. Yawn, 625 So.2d 885 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). ALLEN, C.J., BROWNING and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Timothy Brown v. State

225 So. 3d 399 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 25, 2017

, Appellant, v. … Arnone v. State, 204 So. 3d 556, 557 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) (citing Martin v. State, 87 So. 3d 813, 813 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012); Bell v. State, 150 So. 3d 1214, 1214 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014)).

Brown v. State

250 Ga. App. 697 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Jul 23, 2001

Relying on Byrd v. Owen, 2 Brown argues that his plea could not have been knowingly and intelligently entered because he was not aware of all of the evidence. … See Morgan v. State, 191 Ga.

State v. Brown

3 Haw. App. 386 · Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · Sep 27, 1982

He argued that the case of State v. Severino, 56 Haw. 378 , 537 P.2d 1187 (1975) was applicable and required a dismissal. The motion was denied. … In Severino , our supreme court cites State Department of Highways v. Beckey, 291 Minn. 483 , 192 N.W.2d 441 (1971), which is also relied on by defendant in support of his argument.

Brown v. State

935 So. 2d 593 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 8, 2006

935 So.2d 593 (2006) Terry Williams BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. Nos. 1D05-3421, 1D05-3422. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. August 8, 2006. Nancy A. … See Brannon v.

Brown v. State

250 A.D.2d 796 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 26, 1998

Wesley, 76 NY2d 555 ; People v Goetz, 68 NY2d 96 ). … v State of New York, 186 AD2d 794 ).

Brown v. May

5 A.D.3d 1065 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 19, 2004

People v. Brown

125 Cal. App. 2d 83 · California Court of Appeal · May 7, 1954

In People v. … In People v.

Moon v. Brown

172 Mo. App. 516 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1913

It is not like tbe case of Eice v.. … [Cote Brick Co. v. Sadring, 68 Mo. App. 15 ; Norton Lumber Co. v. Driving Park Assn., 64 Mo. App. 377 .]

Brown v. Ogle

75 Ind. App. 90 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Mar 9, 1921

Luther v. Bash (1916), 61 Ind. App. 535 , 112 N. E. 110 . 1. … Vulcan Iron Works Co. v. Electro, etc., Min. Co. (1913), 54 Ind. App. 28 , 99 N. E. 429 , 100 N. E. 307 ; Finch v. McClellan (1921), (Ind. App.) 130 N. E. 13 , 131 N. E. 236 . Judgment affirmed.

People v. Brown

177 Ill. App. 3d 671 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 22, 1988

(In re Brown (1978), 71 Ill. 2d 151 , 374 N.E.2d 209 ; City of East St. Louis v. Touchette (1958), 14 Ill. 2d 243 , 150 N.E.2d 178 .) … Dear v. Chicago Transit Authority (1979), 72 Ill. App. 3d 729 , 391 N.E.2d 119 .

Brown v. State

34 Ga. App. 452 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Oct 6, 1925

Leverett v. State, 20 Ga. App. 748 ( 93 S. E. 232 ). 2. In such a ease there is no error of which the accused will be heard to complain in the charge: “Presence at the place where such liquors are made is not unlawful.

People v. Brown

272 A.D.2d 339 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 1, 2000

This waiver precludes appellate review of his claim that the enhanced sentences were excessive (see, People v Miles, 268 AD2d 489 ). Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Thompson, Krausman and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Brown v. Terry

67 A.D. 223 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1901

Similar to this is the case of Kimmer v. Weber ( 151 N. … (Perry v. Rogers, 157 N. Y. 251 ; Loughlin v. State of New York, 105 id. 159.) The present case is within these decisions.

State v. Brown

109 Wash. App. 1057 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Dec 24, 2001

State v. Brown

249 S.W.3d 260 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 2008

Brown contends that the trial court plainly erred in not declaring a mistrial, sua sponte, after a witness testified to Brown’s use of racial slurs during his arrest and that the jury reached their verdict based on emotion … As the jury had already indicated during voir dire that it could be fair and impartial in light of evidence of Brown’s use of racial slurs, Brown’s claim is without merit.

Brown v. Collora

278 A.D.2d 266 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 11, 2000

leave to amend his answer to assert the affirmative defense of the Workers’ Compensation Law, as the defense appears to be meritorious and the plaintiff failed to establish prejudice or surprise (see, CPLR 3025 [b]; Murray v … Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the Supreme Court did not conclude that the plaintiff Michael Brown and the defendant third-party plaintiff were “in the same employ” within the meaning of Workers’ Compensation Law

Brown v. State

803 P.2d 887 · Court of Appeals of Alaska · Dec 28, 1990

This court denied relief in Brown v. State, Memorandum Opinion and Judgment No. 1318 (Alaska App., February 4, 1987). … The details of these claims are more fully set out in our prior decision in Brown v. State, Memorandum Opinion and Judgment No. 1318 (Alaska App., February 4, 1987).