Opinion

Brown v. State

  • 935 So. 2d 593
  • 2006 WL 2251818
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Aug 8, 2006
Status
Published
On the bench
Per Curiam
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 48.2%

The opinion

935 So.2d 593 (2006)

Terry Williams BROWN, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 1D05-3421, 1D05-3422.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 8, 2006.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and John B. Kelly, III, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General, and Charlie McCoy, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Brannon v. State, 850 So.2d 452, 456 (Fla.2003) ("[T]he failure to preserve a fundamental sentencing error by motion under rule 3.800(b) or by objection during the sentencing hearing forecloses *594 [the appellant] from raising the error on direct appeal."); Jones v. State, 876 So.2d 642, 645 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) ("Sentencing errors are not reviewable on direct appeal unless they are preserved in the trial court, either by timely objection at sentencing or by a timely filed motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b).").

ERVIN, BENTON, and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.