Case law

Brown v. Roberts

75 Tex. 103 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 12, 1889

Wolfe v. Brown

340 S.W.2d 851 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 17, 1960

In Pickett v. … See also Broaddus v. Grout, 152 Tex. 398 , 258 S.W.2d 308 ; Hoover v. Wukasch, 152 Tex. 111 , 254 S.W.2d 507 . See also Porter v. Bell, Tex.Civ.App., 287 S.W.2d 333 , n. r. e.; Jones v.

Brown v. State

168 Md. App. 400 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Apr 18, 2006

BROWN’S OBJECTION TO A DETECTIVE’S OPINION THAT MR. BROWN CAME TO THE RESIDENCE TO CONDUCT A DRUG TRANSACTION. This argument is controlled by Matoumba v. … Brown v. State, 124 Md.App. 183, 197-98 , 720 A.2d 1270 (1998).

State v. Brown

22 Ohio Law. Abs. 114 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 1936

We are of opinion that this question is fully answered as to the law in Bandy v State, 102 Oh St 384. … Brown simply denied any connection with the crime charged. It is our judgment that the court did not err in the respect challenged.

Brown v. State

24 So. 3d 664 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 15, 2009

24 So.3d 664 (2009) Syehean BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 5D09-176. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. December 15, 2009. James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Noel A. … See Giuliano v. State, 46 So.2d 182 (Fla.1950). MONACO, C.J., TORPY and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Brown v. Elder

182 Ga. App. 352 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Mar 17, 1987

Appellant Brown and appellee Elder entered into a contract for the purchase of appellant’s home. In a separate agreement, appellant agreed to sell specified items of personalty to appellee. … Compare Giles v. Smith, 80 Ga. App. 540 ( 56 SE2d 860 ) (1949), cited by appellant. 2.

Brown v. State

557 S.W.2d 926 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 29, 1977

A teacher had observed the occurrence, and the student was confronted upon Brown’s returning him to the campus, the marijuana was confiscated and Brown subsequently arrested. The student testified for the State. … Conner v. State, 531 S.W.2d 119 (Tenn.Cr.App.1975).

Stracener v. Brown

345 So. 2d 1282 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · May 13, 1977

Brown, M. … Meyer v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Company, 225 La. 618 , 73 So.2d 781 (1954). In this case, there was ample evidence for the jury to conclude that Doctor Brown fulfilled that duty.

Brown v. Leadley

81 Ill. App. 3d 504 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 28, 1980

(Carpenter v. Browning (1881), 98 Ill. 282, 285 ; 36 Ill. L. & Prac. Wills §202 (1958); cf. Irish v. Profitt (1975), 28 Ill. App. 3d 607 , 330 N.E.2d 861 .) … In Young v.

Johnson v. Brown

60 Ohio Law. Abs. 195 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 1949

People v. Brown

14 Ill. App. 3d 242 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 7, 1973

(People v. DeSavieu, 120 Ill.App.2d 45 , 256 N.E.2d 80 .) … (People v. DeSavieu, supra.) Precise accuracy in describing the characteristics of the offender is unnecessary. People v. Miller, 30 Ill.2d 110 , 195 N.E.2d 694 ; People v. McCall, 29 Ill.2d 292 , 194 N.E.2d 222 .

State v. Brown

683 S.W.2d 316 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 26, 1984

Scott v. Scott, 612 S.W.2d 61, 63 (Mo.App.1981). Where it is impossible or impractical to present only facts to the jury, relevant matters are often presented by opinion. … See Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Woods, 663 S.W.2d 392, 399 (Mo. App.1983); 32 C.J.S. Evidence, § 444, p. 56. Such evidence is often a “matter of necessity or expediency”. 2 Jones on Evidence § 404, p. 752 (5th ed. 1958).

Heller v. Brown

29 Conn. Super. Ct. 365 · Connecticut Superior Court · Dec 17, 1971

." § 13a-144 ; Tuckel v. Argraves, 148 Conn. 355 , 358 . Liability has been predicated for defects outside the traveled portion of the highway but within the highway bounds. Hay v. Hill, 137 Conn. 285 .

Worrel v. Brown

177 A.D.2d 446 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 26, 1991

Weisz v Levitt, 59 AD2d 1002, 1003 ). … Kelly, 71 NY2d 135, 143-144 ; Matter of Jones v Ward, 166 AD2d 323 ).

Brown v. State

2021 Ohio 4296 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 18, 2021

[Cite as Brown v. State, 2021-Ohio-4296.] … Graham v. Findlay Mun.

De Young v. Brown

300 Or. App. 530 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 14, 2019

Brown POWERS, J. … Brown has vindicated an important constitutional right applying to all citizens without any personal gain (the “constitutional” theory), Pendleton School Dist. v.

People v. Brown

79 Cal. App. 2d 383 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 29, 1947

In People v. … In People v.

Angel v. Brown

313 Ky. 135 · Court of Appeals of Kentucky · May 30, 1950

and denying any liability under the award of the Compensation Board, claiming he was never a party to the proceedings before that Board and that no summons had been served on him by the Board. … The case then proceeded through the usual steps before the Workmen’s Compensation Board under the names of Bill Brown and Corbett Brown doing business as Brown Brothers.

State v. Brown

422 N.E.2d 1254 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 1981

The State Board of Accounts audited the school corporation’s records and determined that the school corporation overpaid Brown. The State initiated suit by bringing a three count complaint against Brown. … Cress v. State, (1926) 198 Ind. 323 , 152 N.E. 822 .

Hubbard v. Brown

35 A.D. 254 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1898

IV, art. 18; Stephens v. Vroman, 16 N. Y. 381 .)