Opinion

Brown v. State

  • 2021 Ohio 4296
Court
Ohio Court of Appeals
Filed
Nov 18, 2021
Status
Published
On the bench
Per Curiam
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 22.1%

The opinion

[Cite as Brown v. State, 2021-Ohio-4296.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO

SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

COLUMBIANA COUNTY

TERRY BROWN,

Relator/Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF OHIO,

Respondent.

OPINION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY

Case No. 21 CO 0022

Writ of Mandamus

BEFORE:

David A. D’Apolito, Gene Donofrio, Carol Ann Robb, Judges.

JUDGMENT:

Dismissed.

Terry Brown, Pro Se, #751-619, Belmont Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 540, St.

Clairsville, Ohio 43950, Relator/Petitioner and

Atty. David Yost, Ohio Attorney General, Criminal Justice Section, 150 East Gay

Street, 16th Floor, Columbus, Ohio 43215, and Atty. Vito Abruzzino, Columbiana

County Prosecutor, 105 South Market Street, Lisbon, Ohio 44432, for Respondent

(No Response Filed).

–2–

Dated: November 18, 2021

PER CURIAM.

{¶1} Relator, Terry Brown, has petitioned the Court for a writ of mandamus to

compel Respondent, Judge Scott A. Washam, to accept an affidavit charging an assistant

prosecuting attorney with perjury and conspiracy under R.C. 2935.09. Because Relator’s

petition does not comply with the mandatory requirements of R.C. 2969.25, the Court

must dismiss this action.

{¶2} R.C. 2969.25 sets forth specific filing requirements for inmates who file a

civil action against a government employee or entity. Respondent is a government

employee and Relator, incarcerated in the Belmont Correctional Institution, is a self-

represented inmate. R.C. 2969.21(C) and (D). A case must be dismissed if the inmate

fails to comply with the mandatory requirements of R.C. 2969.25 in the commencement

of the action. State ex rel. Graham v. Findlay Mun. Court, 106 Ohio St.3d 63, 2005-Ohio-

3671, 831 N.E.2d 435, ¶ 6 (“The requirements of R.C. 2969.25 are mandatory, and failure

to comply with them subjects an inmate’s action to dismissal.”).

{¶3} First, an inmate must “file with the court an affidavit that contains a

description of each civil action or appeal of a civil action that the inmate has filed in the

previous five years in any state or federal court.” R.C. 2969.25(A). Relator’s petition

contains no such affidavit.

{¶4} Second, Relator did not pay the cost deposit required by Loc.R. 2. He also

failed to comply with R.C. 2969.25(C), which sets forth specific requirements for an

inmate who seeks to proceed without paying the cost deposit. He did not file an affidavit

of waiver and an affidavit of indigency containing a statement of his prisoner trust account

that sets forth the balance in his inmate account for each of the preceding six months, as

certified by the institutional cashier, as required by R.C. 2969.25(C).

{¶5} Because Relator did not comply with the mandatory requirements of R.C.

2969.25, the case is dismissed. Costs taxed to Relator.

{¶6} The clerk of courts is hereby directed to serve upon all parties not in default

notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. Civ.R. 58.

Case No. 21 CO 0022

–3–

JUDGE DAVID A. D’APOLITO

JUDGE GENE DONOFRIO

JUDGE CAROL ANN ROBB

Case No. 21 CO 0022

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.