Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.38s
Brown v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
68 Pa. Commw. 584 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 3, 1982
Brown (Claimant) was denied unemployment compensation benefits because tlie Unemployment Compensation Board of Review found that bis services were properly defined as self-employment and therefore ineligible for benefits … Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Kessler, 27 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 1 , 365 A.2d 459 (1976). Order affirmed.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBrown v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
162 Pa. Commw. 1 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 20, 1993
Russell v. … Kachinski v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Vepco Construction Co.), 516 Pa. 240 , 532 A.2d 374 (1987).
Cited 1 timesPublishedBrown v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
87 A.3d 1002 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 2014
Brown (Claimant) petitions this Court for review of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review’s (UCBR) April 24, 2013 order affirming the Referee’s decision that Claimant is not financially eligible for unemployment compensation … Welfare v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeal Bd. (Pochran), 682 A.2d 889, 894 (Pa.Cmwlth.1996); see also Hardiman v. Dep’t of Pub. Welfare, 121 Pa.Cmwlth. 120 , 550 A.2d 590 (1988); and McAnallen v. Unemployment Comp.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBrown v. Board of State Fair Managers
6 Kan. App. 2d 40 · Court of Appeals of Kansas · Apr 17, 1981
Its constitutionality was upheld in Brown v. Wichita State University, 219 Kan. 2 , 547 P.2d 1015 (1976). … The defendant Board of State Fair Managers is a board of the State of Kansas authorized to conduct a state fair, K.S.A. 74-520 et seq., and therefore was covered by K.S.A. 46-901. In Flax v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBrown v. Webster Parish School Board
716 So. 2d 16 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 16, 1998
Brown and his wife filed their original petition against the Webster Parish School Board on April 24,1991. Brown sued for his personal injuries and his wife for her loss of consortium. … Boyle v. Board of Supervisors, Louisiana State University, 96-1158 (La.1/14/97), 685 So.2d 1080 ; Reed, supra.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBrown v. Board of Children's Guardians
104 Ind. App. 69 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 1937
McCauley et al. v. Murdock et al. (1884), 97 Ind. 229 ; The Sheridan Gas, Oil and Coal Co. v. Pearson (1898), 19 Ind. App. 252 , 49 N. E. 357 ; Carmichael et al. v. Arms (1912), 51 Ind. App. 689 , 100 N. E. 302 . … See also Pittsburgh v. Stephens (1927), 86 Ind. App. 251 , 157 N. E. 58 ; Moore v. Harmon (1895), 142 Ind. 555 , 41 N. E. 599 ; Carmien v. Cornell (1897), 148 Ind. 83 , 47 N. E. 216 ; Western Union v. State ex rel.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBrown v. Georgia State Board of Veterinary Medicine
134 Ga. App. 574 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Apr 18, 1975
Brown, is not so licensed. "2. On or about February 28, 1973, Mrs. … Brown v. Georgia State Board of Veterinary Medicine, 232 Ga. 762 ( 209 SE2d 6 ). Judgment affirmed. Pannell, P. J., and Clark, J., concur.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBrown Group Retail, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board
44 Cal. App. 4th 823 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 22, 1996
The Franchise Tax Board of the State of California (FTB) appeals from a judgment entered against it and in favor of Brown Group Retail, Inc., successor by merger to Wetherby-Kayser Shoe Company, a Missouri corporation (Brown … (Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax Bd. (1981) 117 Cal.App.3d 988, 993 [ 173 Cal.Rptr. 121 ]; Automatic Canteen Co. v. State Board of Equalization (1965) 238 Cal.App.2d 372, 381 [ 47 Cal.Rptr. 848 ].)”
Cited 2 timesPublishedBrown v. New York State Board of Parole
72 A.D.3d 1375 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 22, 2010
Petitioner’s reappearance before the Board in September 2008 rendered his challenge to its prior determination moot as petitioner received all the relief to which he was entitled (see Matter of Perez v Alexander, 69 AD3d … 1195 [2010]; Matter of Dobranski v Alexander, 69 AD3d 1091 [2010]).
Cited 1 timesPublishedBrown v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
821 A.2d 170 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 9, 2003
Houser v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 682 A.2d 1365 (Pa.Cmwlth.1996). … Scott v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 739 A.2d 1142, 1145 (Pa.Cmwlth.1999) (quoting Commonwealth v. Lassiter, 554 Pa. 586, 592 , 722 A.2d 657, 660 (1998)) (citations omitted).
Cited 1 timesPublishedBrown v. Schuyler-Chemung-Tioga Board of Cooperative Educational Services
5 A.D.3d 939 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 18, 2004
School Dist., 216 AD2d 397, 399 [1995], lv dismissed 86 NY2d 886 [1995]; Matter of Vail v Board of Coop. Educ. … Servs., 115 AD2d 231, 232 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 606 [1986]; Matter of Cordani v Board of Educ. of Hempstead School Dist., 66 AD2d 780, 781 [1978]) and agree that the 30-day waiting period in Education Law § 3813 (1) tolled
Cited 2 timesPublishedBrown v. Zoning Board of Appeals
231 Conn. App. 372 · Connecticut Appellate Court · Mar 18, 2025
App. 1 Brown v. Zoning Board of Appeals VIRGINIA BROWN v. … App. 1 Brown v. Zoning Board of Appeals zone.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. Board of Trustees of Internal Improvement Trust Fund
369 So. 2d 640 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 27, 1979
This is an appeal from a final judgment in a suit to quiet title instituted by the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund, an agency of the State of Florida Department of Natural Resources, in the Circuit … Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13, 16 (Fla.1976); Jefferson National Bank at Sunny Isles v. Metropolitan Dade County, 271 So.2d 207, 214 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); Gars v. Woodard, 214 So.2d 385, 386 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968). Affirmed.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBrown v. Canfield Board of Zoning Appeals
123 Ohio App. 3d 442 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 28, 1997
Brown, appeals from an order of the Mahoning County Common Pleas Court which affirmed the granting of a use variance by defendant-appellee, Canfield Township Board of Zoning Appeals, in favor of defendant-appellee, Ohev Tzedek-Sharrei … Appellant relies largely upon this court’s decision in Fox v. Johnson (1971), 28 Ohio App.2d 175 , 57 O.O.2d 234 , 275 N.E.2d 637 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedBrown v. Department of Workforce Services, Workforce Appeals Board
686 Utah Adv. Rep. 62 · Court of Appeals of Utah · Jul 14, 2011
Brown petitions for review of the decision of the Workforce Appeals Board (Board) determining that Brown's initial appeal from the denial of unemployment benefits was untimely. … The Board did not err in subsequently affirming the lack of jurisdiction over Brown's appeal. ' 5 We uphold the Board's decision.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBrown v. State Officers Electoral Board
2026 IL App (1st) 260169 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 6, 2026
Elam v. Municipal Officers Electoral Board for Riverdale, 2021 IL 127080, ¶ 13. … ¶ 33 Circuit court judgment reversed; Board decision reversed. 13 No. 1-26-0169 Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Brown v. Board of Supervisors
170 A.D. 364 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 3, 1915
Brown v. Freisch, 168 App. Div. 370, 960, 963 .) The intervenor appealed to the Court of Appeals. … Brown v. Freisch, 215 N. Y. 356, 374 .) The present appeal was argued before us but a very few days ago.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBrown & Co. Jewelry, Inc. v. Fulton County Board of Assessors
248 Ga. App. 651 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Mar 19, 2001
Hart v. Hart, 245 Ga. App. 734 -735 ( 538 SE2d 814 ) (2000). Here, no error occurred. See Glover v. Ware, 236 Ga. App. 40, 45 (3) ( 510 SE2d 895 ) (1999). … To support that assertion, Brown relies solely upon Marion v. Floyd County Bd. of Equalization, 270 Ga. 475 ( 511 SE2d 512 ) (1999). 1 But Marion is factually and legally distinguishable.
Cited 1 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Brown v. Vernon Parish School Board
178 So. 181 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jan 11, 1938
Temple v. … of Miss Pearle Peace is affirmed at her costs; and that the judgment in favor of relator and against the defendant school board is affirmed at the cost of defendant.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna