Opinion

Brown v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

  • 68 Pa. Commw. 584
  • 449 A.2d 869
  • 1982 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1529
Court
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Sep 3, 1982
Status
Published
Author
Doyle
On the bench
Blatt, Doyle, Session, Williams
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 64.4%

The opinion

Opinion by

Judge Doyle,

Wain K. Brown (Claimant) was denied unemployment compensation benefits because tlie Unemployment Compensation Board of Review found that bis services were properly defined as self-employment and therefore ineligible for benefits pursuant to Section 402(h) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law). 1

Claimant alleges that the Board received insufficient evidence to satisfy the. burden of proof that his services did not constitute employment. The Law establishes a two part test to determine if an individual is self-employed. Section 4(1) (2) (B) of the Law. 2 First, the Claimant must be shown to be free from control or direction during the performance of his services. Second, the Claimant must be customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation or business. Upon a thorough review of the record, we find that there is sufficient evidence to establish that Claimant was conducting independent research absent any direction or control. It is clear that Claimant performed his services when, where, and how he chose to perform them. His association with the National Center for Juvenile Justice (the would be employer) was limited to supplying quarterly progress reports which were forwarded to (and a requirement of) the Buhl Foundation which supplied the grant financing. Furthermore, the Board received evidence that Claimant performed other consulting services unrelated to the Buhl Foundation grant. The Board found that this was substantial evidence that the Claimant had a proprietary interest in an independently established trade, occupation, profession or business. Since the Board found substantial evidence *586 that Claimant satisfied both pants of the test under Section 4(1) (2) (B) of the Law, Claimant’s activity was not “employment.” Jochynek v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 32 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 86 , 378 A.2d 490 (1977). Consequently, Claimant was engaged in self-employment and therefore was ineligible for compensation. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Kessler, 27 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 1 , 365 A.2d 459 (1976).

Order affirmed.

Order

Now, September 3, 1982, the order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review dated October 7, 1981 at Decision No. B-186542-B is hereby affirmed.

Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. [1937] 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §802(b).

48 P.S. §753(1) (2) (B).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.