Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSA

10,000+ results

1.82s

  • Brown v. State

    924 N.E.2d 680 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Mar 25, 2010

    924 N.E.2d 680 (2010) BROWN v. STATE. No. 71A03-0910-CR-477. Court of Appeals of Indiana. March 25, 2010. MAY, J. Disposition of Case by Unpublished Memorandum Decision Affirmed. DARDEN, J., concurs. KIRSCH, J., concurs.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Commonwealth

    23 Va. App. 225 · Court of Appeals of Virginia · Nov 6, 1996

    Martin v. Commonwealth, 13 Va.App. 524, 530 , 414 S.E.2d 401, 404 (1992). Brown’s counsel consistently maintained that the testimony was admissible. … Horne v. Milgrim, 226 Va. 133, 139 , 306 S.E.2d 893, 896 (1983). Gentry’s testimony, if believed by the jury, would have tended to prove an element of Brown’s defense. III.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Wisniski v. BROWN & BROWN INS. CO. OF PA

    852 A.2d 1206 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 7, 2004

    852 A.2d 1206 (2004) Mark and Elizabeth WISNISKI T/D/B/A Saturn Surplus, Appellants v. BROWN & BROWN INS. CO. OF PA, Donald Blood and Will Rineer, EMC Ins. Co. and Scott W. Ahlstrom, Appellees. … Mark and Elizabeth Wisniski T/D/B/A Saturn Surplus, Appellees v. Brown & Brown Ins. Co. of Pa, Donald Blood and Will Rineer, EMC Ins. Co. and Scott W.

    Vacated on other grounds by Wisniski v. BROWN & BROWN INS. CO. OF PA, 585 Pa. 44 (2005)Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hempkins

    38 S.W.2d 173 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 2, 1931

    Knox v. Brown (Tex. Com. App.) supra, 16 S.W.(2d) page 263, pars. 1 and 2; Goodbar & Co. v. Bloom, 43 Tex. Civ. App. 434 , 96 S. W. 657, 661 , et seq. … Knox v. Brown, supra, 16 S.W.(2d) page 263, pars. 1 to 4, inclusive; Young v. Blain, supra, pars. 5 to 8, inclusive; Watson v. Beall (Tex. Civ. App.) . 279 S. W. 543, 545 , par. 3; Wood v. De Winter (Tex. Civ.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    141 A.D.2d 755 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 20, 1988

    In any event, while we disapprove of the reference to wavering minds to explain the meaning of reasonable doubt (see, e.g., People v Stevenson, 104 AD2d 835 ), the charge, read as a whole, conveyed the correct standard of … proof to the jury (see, People v Stevenson, supra).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Ridgeway

    149 Cal. App. 3d 732 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 12, 1983

    (See Butterfield v. Tietz (1966) 247 Cal.App.2d 483, 484-485 [ 55 Cal.Rptr. 577 ].) Facts A complaint was filed in this matter by Roger Brown (plaintiff) on August 26, 1977. … (See Christerson v. French (1919) 180 Cal. 523, 525 [ 182 P. 27 ]; A & B Metal Products v. MacArthur Properties, Inc. (1970) 11 Cal.App.3d 642, 647 [ 89 Cal.Rptr. 873 ]; Remainders, Inc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Knox v. Brown

    8 S.W.2d 280 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 17, 1928

    Denison v. Brown (Tex.Civ.App.) 172 S.W. 725 . The result is the same in such case as in one where there are contradictory findings. See Stoker v. Fugitt (Tex.Civ.App.) 102 S.W. 743 ; Humble Oil Co. v. … In the case of Miller v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    38 So. 3d 139 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jun 25, 2010

    38 So.3d 139 (2010) BROWN v. STATE. No. 2D10-644. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. June 25, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gilbert v. Brown

    71 Or. App. 809 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 23, 1985

    See Allen v. Allen, 275 Or 471, 479 , 551 P2d 459 (1976); Manning v. U.S. Nat. Bank, supra. … Holbrook, 240 Or 567 , 403 P2d 12 (1965); Halleck v. Halleck, 216 Or 23 , 337 P2d 330 (1959); Manning v. U. S. Nat. Bank, supra; and Beach v. Holland, 172 Or 396 , 142 P2d 990 (1943).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    48 Ala. App. 84 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Sep 14, 1971

    Barnard v. State, 155 Miss. 390 , 124 So. 479 ; Welch v. State, 154 Tenn. 60 , 289 S.W. 510 . However, in the cases of Hester v. United States, 265 U.S. 57 , 44 S. Ct. 445 , 68 L. Ed. 898 ; Atwell v. … Brown ? “A. Seven.” The appellant argues that the court was in error in overruling the above objection to his testimony.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    920 N.E.2d 277 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Jan 22, 2010

    920 N.E.2d 277 (2010) BROWN v. STATE. No. 49A05-0908-CR-441. Court of Appeals of Indiana. January 22, 2010. FRIEDLANDER, J. Disposition of Case by Unpublished Memorandum Decision Affirmed. NAJAM, J., concurs.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Selsky

    38 A.D.3d 657 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 13, 2007

    misbehavior report, the positive test results for cannabinoids, and the hearing testimony that the petitioner’s medication did not cause a false positive result, constituted substantial evidence of guilt (see Matter of Rincon v … Selsky, 28 AD3d 565, 566 [2006]; Matter of Burse v Goord, 274 AD2d 678, 679 [2000]; Matter of McBride v Selsky, 257 AD2d 930 [1999]).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Lohrenzen v. Brown

    129 Ohio App. 3d 770 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 14, 1998

    I On June 28, 1993, defendants-appellees Jerry Brown and Brown Auction Service entered into an auction contract with appellant whereby appellees agreed to conduct an auction to sell certain items owned by appellant. … Thomas v. Freeman (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 221, 224 , 680 N.E.2d 997, 1000 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    924 So. 2d 37 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 26, 2006

    See Munn v. Florida Parole Comm’n, 807 So.2d 738 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). We do, however, encourage the circuit court to promptly rule on the merits of the claim after petitioner has amended his motion.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Meegan v. Brown

    66 A.D.3d 1500 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 2, 2009

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    217 Or. App. 330 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 26, 2007

    State v. … In some ways, the facts of this case resemble those in State v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    829 So. 2d 286 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 16, 2002

    829 So.2d 286 (2002) David Lee BROWN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 3D02-2620. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. October 16, 2002. Rehearing Denied November 8, 2002. … David Lee Brown, in proper person. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee. Before JORGENSON, GODERICH, and GREEN, JJ. *287 PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Hughes v. State, 826 So.2d 1070 (Fla. 1st DCA, 2002).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Marshall v. Brown

    608 S.W.2d 105 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 1980

    Defendant Charles Brown appeals a judgment of $20,000 entered upon a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff Michael Marshall. … In Ristaino v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    37 So. 3d 870 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jun 15, 2010

    37 So.3d 870 (2010) BROWN v. STATE. No. 5D10-1584. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. June 15, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Mabe

    170 Ohio App. 3d 13 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 12, 2007

    In Dresher v. … State v. French (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 446, 450 , 650 N.E.2d 887 . 3 . See R.C. 2505.03(A). 4 . Grover v. Bartsch, 2nd Dist. No. 21413, 170 Ohio App.3d 188 , 2006-Ohio-6115 , 866 N.E.2d 547, ¶ 9 ; Horner v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.