Opinion

Brown v. State

  • 924 So. 2d 37
  • 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 814
  • 2006 WL 181394
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Jan 26, 2006
Status
Published
On the bench
Kahn, Padovano, Thomas
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 58.0%

The opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the trial court has issued a recent order granting petitioner leave to amend his motion for post-conviction relief, we conclude that the granting of mandamus relief is not warranted. See Munn v. Florida Parole Comm’n, 807 So.2d 738 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). We do, however, encourage the circuit court to promptly rule on the merits of the claim after petitioner has amended his motion.

KAHN, C.J., PADOVANO and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.