Case law

Commonwealth v. Brown

402 Pa. Super. 365 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 21, 1991

CAVANAUGH, Judge: Appellant, William Brown, challenges his conviction and sentence for charges stemming from his possession of an illegal firearm. 1 Mr Brown was charged on July 12, 1989 with violation of 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 6106 … Commonwealth v. Pierce, 515 Pa. 153 , 527 A.2d 973 (1987). This first claim is factually meritless.

Brown v. Jenne

122 So. 3d 881 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 1, 2012

Alverna Brown, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Oral George Brown (the “decedent”), appeals from final summary judgments granted in favor of nine different defendants on appellant’s claims of violation of Brown … See, e.g., Brown v. Commonwealth of Penn., Dep’t of Health Emergency Med. Servs.

Brown v. Haun

144 Or. App. 245 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 23, 1996

Brown v. BELLEQUE

236 Or. App. 478 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 28, 2010

App. 478 BROWN v. BELLEQUE. A140508 Court of Appeals of Oregon. July 28, 2010. Affirmed without opinion.

Brown v. McCullough

60 Pa. Super. 98 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 14, 1915

Pleading, sec. 228; Budd v. Olver, 148 Pa. 194 . “Subrogation is a matter of grace, not of right, and is a creature of pure equity. It will never be decreed where it works injustice:” Budd v. Olver, supra. … There is no right of set-off against Dotlow, and consequently no right to a set-off against Brown’s right of subrogation.” Dotlow purchased the interest from James A.

Brown v. State

261 Ga. App. 228 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · May 12, 2003

Stinson v. State, 254 Ga. App. 810 (1) ( 564 SE2d 39 ) (2002). … Johnson v. State, 230 Ga. App. 535, 537 (1) ( 496 SE2d 785 ) (1998).

Brown v. State

288 Ga. App. 812 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Dec 10, 2007

Brown threw the liquid at the deputy, hitting him in the face and chest. The deputy then sprayed Brown with pepper spray. … Phipps and Mikell, JJ., concur. 1 Burge v. State, 243 Ga. App. 673, 674 ( 534 SE2d 132 ) (2000). 2 Id. 3 OCGA§ 16-5-20 (a). 4 See Glanton v. State, 283 Ga. App. 232, 234 ( 641 SE2d 234 ) (2007).

Com. v. Brown

22 A.3d 1070 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 15, 2010

22 A.3d 1070 (2010) COM. v. BROWN. No. 2119 MDA 2009. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. November 15, 2010. Affirmed.

Brown v. State

95 Ark. App. 348 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 14, 2006

See Weber v. … Brown cites Jackson v.

Maddox v. Brown

200 Ga. App. 492 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Jul 1, 1991

When this case previously appeared before this court in Maddox v. Brown, 193 Ga. … See Maddox v. Brown, 193 Ga. App. 158 ( 387 SE2d 584 ) (1989); Maddox v. Brown, 188 Ga. App. 728 ( 374 SE2d 222 ) (1988). Finally, the case proceeded to trial and this appeal addresses the jury verdict.

People v. Brown

2013 IL App (1st) 83158 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 13, 2013

People v. Brown, No. 1-08-3158 (May 26, 2010) (unpublished order under Supreme Court Rule 23). … People v. Brown, 238 Ill. 2d 656 (2010) (table). This court and the circuit court acted as directed.

Beers v. Brown

204 Or. App. 395 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 15, 2006

In Montagne v. … See Arrien v.

State v. Brown

575 So. 2d 763 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 6, 1991

State v. Suco, 521 So.2d 1100, 1102 (Fla.1988). … Appellee incorrectly relies on State v.

State v. Brown

237 Or. App. 211 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 25, 2010

App. 211 STATE v. BROWN. A141816 Court of Appeals of Oregon. August 25, 2010. Affirmed without opinion.

State v. Brown

236 Or. App. 269 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 21, 2010

App. 269 STATE v. BROWN. A141853. Court of Appeals of Oregon. July 21, 2010. Affirmed without opinion.

Brown v. Howard

86 Cal. App. 532 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 2, 1927

{Bank of United States v. Bank of Washington, 6 Pet. (U. S.) 19 [ 8 L. Ed. 299 ].) … {Rickert v. Pollock, 46 Misc. Rep. 275 [ 92 N. Y. Supp. 89 ].)

People v. Brown

243 A.D.2d 282 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 7, 1997

instructed that the weight of such testimony was a question for its determination (Meiselman v Crown Hgts. … Based on the existing record, we find that defendant received meaningful representation by counsel (see, People v Rivera, 71 NY2d 705 ; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137 ; see also, People v Ho-bot, 84 NY2d 1021 ).

Brown v. LeBlanc

2010 La.App. 1 Cir. 0491 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Oct 29, 2010

Brown’s complaint, written pro se, listed the Department as well as the Parole Board as defendants. Noting that the Department has no authority over decisions of the Parole Board, the district court dismissed Mr. … Brown’s claims against the Department. 4 As to the Parole Board, the district court allowed Mr. Brown to proceed with the appeal of his parole revocation, in accordance with La.

Cotter v. Brown

17 A.D.3d 587 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 18, 2005

Accordingly, the order holding her in contempt was improper (see Sklover v Sklover, 11 AD3d 527, 528 [2004]; Matter of King v King, 249 AD2d 395 [1998]). … mother demonstrated that an order directing *588 the father to permit reasonable telephone contact between her and the child during periods of the father’s visitation, was in the child’s best interests (see Matter of Dobbins v

Brown v. McCullough

240 A.D. 381 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 16, 1934

(Ward v. Iroquois Gas Corp., 258 N. Y. 124 ; Price v. Ryan, 255 id. 16.) … (Case v. Perew, 46 Hun, 57 ; affd., 122 N. Y. 665 ; Montenes v. Metropolitan Street R. Co., 77 App.