Case law

People v. Brown

6 A.D.3d 358 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 29, 2004

Ayala v New York, 522 US 1002 [1997]). … Herring, 83 NY2d 780 [1994]; People v Vaughan, 300 AD2d 104 [2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 633 [2003]; People v Leon, 295 AD2d 143 [2002]).

Brown v. Allen

135 S.W. 601 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 1, 1911

Brown v. Hines

16 Ind. App. 1 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Sep 23, 1896

The cases of Shellhouse v. State, 110 Ind. 509 ; Tucker v. Conrad, 103 Ind. 349 ; Mansur v. State, 60 Ind. 357 , are relied upon to support this contention. … Tucker v. Conrad, *4 supra. But in the case at bar the twenty years’ use constituted the way a public one before the annexation. The case of Shellhouse v. State, supra, and Mansur v .

Brown v. Pumpian

12 Fla. L. Weekly 819 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 19, 1987

504 So.2d 481 (1987) William BROWN, Brian Reynard, Donna Griffin and Rochelin Lormejuste, Petitioners, v. The Honorable Arthur P. … Schneider v.

Miller v. Brown

59 So. 2d 725 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 18, 1952

Miller, Clyde Brown, Prentiss Huff and L. M. Wimberly, the latter a state trooper. Numerous photographs were taken while the cars were still in position following the impact. Mrs. … See: Belden v. Roberts, 1926, 3 La.App. 338 ; Buckner v. Powers, 1930, 12 La.App. 630 , 125 So. 744 ; Payne v. Prestridge, 1931, 16 La.App. 479 , 133 So. 512 ; Smith’s Tutorship v.

State v. Brown

2012 Ohio 2515 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 2012

[Cite as State v. Brown, 2012-Ohio-2515.] … Upon defendant’s motion, the trial court vacated defendant’s conviction pursuant to State v.

Munday v. Brown

617 S.W.2d 897 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 7, 1981

Brown.” Thereafter, on the appointed date the application for a temporary restraining order was heard. … Brown prayed “that this case be re-set for trial, at an early date, at a time convenient to the parties — for a hearing on the merits.” Mr. Casey filed this “COMPLAINT” as counsel for Ms. Brown.

Brown v. Cranston

214 Cal. App. 2d 660 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 29, 1963

The case of First Federal Sav. & Loan Assn. of Hollywood v. State Board, of Control, 53 Cal.App.2d 391 [ 128 P.2d 75 ], involved a claim for the refund of certain taxes. … (California Toll Bridge Authority v. Kuchel, 40 Cal.2d 43, 53 [ 251 P.2d 4 ]; County of Alameda v. Kuchel, 32 Cal.2d 193, 199 [ 195 P.2d 17 ]; Dickey v.

Brown v. State

71 So. 3d 122 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 2, 2011

71 So.3d 122 (2011) BROWN v. STATE. No. 2D11-4114. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. September 2, 2011. DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION Certiorari dismissed.

Brown v. State

662 So. 2d 1358 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Nov 22, 1995

State v. Johnson, 616 So.2d 1, 4 (Fla.1993). … See Freeman v. State, 616 So.2d 155 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (habitual offender sentence would be reversed only if defendant was affected by the amendments to section 775.084 contained in chapter 89-280).

People v. Brown

309 A.D.2d 1084 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 30, 2003

]; People v Gonzalez, 299 AD2d 581, 582 [2002]). … v Goodings, 277 AD2d 725 [2000], lv denied 96 NY2d 735 [2001]).

Brown v. State

54 S.W.3d 930 · Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · Aug 31, 2001

See Stavinoha v. … (relevance of victim impact testimony in a non-capital felony case requires that such testimony have a “close, direct link to circumstances of case”); Brown v. State, 875 S.W.2d 38, 40 (Tex.App.—Austin 1994, no pet.)

Brown v. Hurley

122 Ga. App. 545 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Sep 30, 1970

Brown v. P'pool

25 Tenn. App. 629 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 11, 1942

Brown, conveyed to defendant, Dr. … He said there were some 90 licensed real estate brokers in Fort Lauderdale and only 32 of them belonged to the Board. He also said that R. T.

Com. v. Brown

15 A.3d 514 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 4, 2010

15 A.3d 514 (2010) COM. v. BROWN. No. 1194 EDA 2009. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. October 4, 2010. Affirmed.

State v. Brown

9 La.App. 5 Cir. 209 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 29, 2009

. |2Pefendant, Scott Brown, was charged with possession of cocaine in violation of LSA-R.S. 40:967 C. … So, even if there was a weapon inside, Scott Brown wouldn’t have had access to it, correct? A. That’s correct.

Day v. Brown

207 Ga. App. 134 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Jan 19, 1993

Day, acting pro se, brought a suit naming as defendants, Brown, Dykes, and the DeKalb County Police Department. … See Shrader v. Hopkins, 195 Ga. App. 639, 640 ( 394 SE2d 538 ) (1990); Williams v. City of Atlanta, 794 F2d 624 (11th Cir. 1986).

State v. Brown

20 N.C. App. 483 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 9, 1974

The appeal is an exception to the judgment and presents the face of the record proper for review, State v. Thurgood, 11 N.C. App. 405 , 181 S.E. 2d 128 (1971); State v. Martin, 10 *484 N.C.

State v. Brown

100 Wash. App. 104 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Mar 27, 2000

The court ordered counts I, IV V and VII against Brown to run consecutively, with counts II and III running concurrently with the other counts. … State v. Petrich, 101 Wn.2d 566, 572 , 683 P.2d 173 (1984). 135 Wn.2d 239 , 955 P.2d 798 (1998). Lewis Brown did not know his assailants. He identified them later from photomontages.

State v. Brown

152 Wash. App. 1016 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Sep 15, 2009