Case law

Brown v. Schoenberg

121 Ill. App. 2d 342 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 10, 1970

(See City of Elmhurst v. Kegerreis, 392 Ill 195, 203, 64 NE2d 450 ; see also People ex rel. McAllister v. East, 409 Ill 379, 383, 100 NE2d 746 .) … Plaintiff cites the case of Casillas v.

Brown v. Derry

10 Wash. App. 459 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Jan 21, 1974

Baxter v. Greyhound Corp., 65 Wn.2d. 421, 397 P.2d 857 (1964). As we stated in Stevens v. State, 4 Wn. … Accord, Chapman v. State, 6 Wn. App. 316 , 492 P.2d 607 (1972). In Wickman v.

People v. Brown

169 Cal. App. 3d 800 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 27, 1985

Four eyewitnesses positively identified appellant, Yvonne Lindo Brown, as the bank robber. … In People v.

Weese v. Brown

28 Mo. App. 521 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 9, 1888

The statement filed, and on which the case was tried, is as follows: “ 1884 Henry Brown, Dr., “ To Joseph Weese “ To amount due on contract for digging well............'..................$60.00.” … Lyons ( 24 Mo. 533 ); Holland v. Steamboat ( 25 Mo. 58 ); Quinn v. Stout ( 31 Mo. 160 ); Burt v. Warn ( 31 Mo. 471 ); Armstrong v. Keleher ( 71 Mo. 492 ); Allen v. McMonagle ( 77 Mo. 478 ); Hale v.

Earl Thomas Burgess v. Ford Motor Company

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 28, 2012

Other cases relied upon by Ford include McEwen v. Brown Shoe Co. at Trenton, 1996 WL 515442 (Tenn. Ct. App. … Calabro, 15 S.W.3d at 879 (citing Amacher v. Brown-Forman Corp., 826 S.W.2d 480, 482 (Tenn. App. Ct. 1991)). Promissory estoppel is an equitable doctrine, and “its limits are defined by equity and reason.” Chavez v.

Com. v. Brown

26 A.3d 1173 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 1, 2011

26 A.3d 1173 (2011) COM. v. BROWN. No. 441 EDA 2010. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. March 1, 2011. Affirmed.

Brown v. Scully

135 A.D.2d 713 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 21, 1987

The failure of the petitioner to acquire personal jurisdiction over the respondents is a fatal jurisdictional defect precluding further action by this court (see, Macchia v Russo, 67 NY2d 592 ). Thompson, J. … P., Brown, Fiber and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Brown v. State

681 So. 2d 1102 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Jan 19, 1996

See Brown v. State , 623 So.2d 416 (Ala.Cr.App. 1993). He is now appealing the trial court's summary denial of his petition for post-conviction relief brought pursuant to Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P. … See, e.g., Floyd v. State , 571 So.2d 1221 (Ala.Cr.App. 1989); Saffold v. State , 563 So.2d 1074 (Ala.Cr.App. 1990); Henley v. State , [1991], 582 So.2d 590 (Ala.Cr.App. 1991).' " Tedder v.

Brown v. State

210 Ga. App. 59 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Aug 19, 1993

OCGA § 16-8-40 (a) (2); Jackson v. Virginia, 443 *60 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560); Johnson v. State, 195 Ga. App. 56, 57 (1) (b) ( 392 SE2d 280 ). … Mobley v. State, 221 Ga. 716 ( 146 SE2d 735 ) (1966); Britten v. State, 221 Ga. 97 (4) ( 143 SE2d 176 ) (1965); Miller v. State, 226 Ga. 730 ( 177 SE2d 253 ) (1970).” Hurt v.

State v. Brown

240 Or. App. 352 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 5, 2011

App. 352 STATE v. BROWN. A141276 Court of Appeals of Oregon. January 5, 2011. Affirmed without opinion.

Nash v. Brown

898 So. 2d 619 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 16, 2005

898 So.2d 619 (2005) John David NASH v. David J. BROWN, M.D., et al. No. CW 04-751. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. March 16, 2005. *620 John E. … Sewell v. Doctors Hosp., 600 So.2d 577 (La.1992).

Brown v. State

825 So. 2d 70 · Court of Appeals of Mississippi · Aug 27, 2002

On March 19, 1999, Johnny Brown, Jr., along with his nephew Reginald Brown, were jointly indicted by the Pike County grand jury for the burglary of a house owned by Amanda Carr. … DID THE TRIAL COURT ERR IN ALLOWING THE STATE TO USE REGINALD BROWN AND TOMMY SQUIRES AS WITNESSES? A. Reginald Brown ¶ 10.

People v. Brown

195 Ill. App. 3d 78 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 12, 1990

PRESIDING JUSTICE UNVERZAGT delivered the opinion of the court: The defendant, Ezekiel Brown, was tried in a bench trial in the circuit court of Lake County for the offenses of attempted first-degree murder, armed robbery … (See, e.g., People v.

State v. Brown

66 So. 3d 78 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · May 6, 2011

66 So.3d 78 (2011) STATE v. BROWN. No. 2010 KA 1765. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. May 6, 2011. WELCH, J. DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION Convictions and Sentences Affirmed.

People v. Brown

208 A.D.2d 414 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 13, 1994

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755 , cert denied 469 US 932 ), defendant’s guilt was established beyond a reasonable doubt (People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 ). … to prejudice the jury (People v Halm, 81 NY2d 819, 821 ), and there is not a significant likelihood that this single comment affected the verdict (People v Pizzaro, supra), especially in light of the court’s corrective charge

State v. Brown

217 N.C. App. 380 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 6, 2011

State v. Hill, 31 N.C. App. 248, 249 , 229 S.E.2d 810, 810 (1976). … Brown’s check was actually forged.”

Thompson v. Brown

75 Cal. App. 2d 344 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 15, 1946

The resignation was accepted by the board on May 11, 1936, and on the following day plaintiff addressed to each member of the board a letter in which he rescinded and withdrew his resignation and requested the board to rescind … (People v. Marsh, 30 Cal.App. 424 [ 159 P. 191 ].)

Brown v. Grossman

108 N.Y.S. 653 · Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Feb 7, 1908

State v. Brown

445 S.W.2d 647 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 1969

Defendant cites Sect. 543.020 V.A.M.S. and State v. Wilkson, 36 Mo.App. 373 ; State v. Humble, 34 Mo.App. 343 ; State v. Hatfield, 40 Mo.App. 358 , and State v. Buck, 43 Mo.App. 443 . … In the case of State v.

Cook v. Brown

346 S.W.2d 725 · Court of Appeals of Kentucky · May 27, 1960

It is provided in KRS 394.200 that executors may testify either for or against a will and in Reiter v. … Swinebroad v. Bright, 116 Ky. 514 , 76 S.W. 365 , 25 Ky.Law Rep. 742; Knuckles v. Howard, 261 Ky. 89 , 87 S.W.2d 106 .