Case law

Brown v. Mills

241 Or. App. 723 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 30, 2011

App. 723 BROWN v. MILLS. A142792 Court of Appeals of Oregon. March 30, 2011. Affirmed without opinion.

Brown v. State

951 N.E.2d 871 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Aug 12, 2011

951 N.E.2d 871 (2011) BROWN v. STATE. No. 49A02-1011-CR-1200. Court of Appeals of Indiana. August 12, 2011. DARDEN, J. Disposition of Case by Unpublished Memorandum Decision Affirmed. RILEY, J., concurs.

Wilson v. Brown

461 N.E.2d 1162 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Apr 19, 1984

Stokes v. City of Mishawaka, (1982) Ind.App., 441 N.E.2d 24 ; Wildwood Park Community Ass’n v. Fort Wayne, (1979) Ind.App., 396 N.E.2d 678 . However, this is true in the case of most ordinances. … Gary v. Lake Sup. Ct., (1947) 225 Ind. 478 , 76 N.E.2d 254 (overruled on other grounds); Vollmer v. Board, etc., (1913) 53 Ind.App. 149 , 101 N.E. 321 .

Nash v. Brown

898 So. 2d 619 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 16, 2005

898 So.2d 619 (2005) John David NASH v. David J. BROWN, M.D., et al. No. CW 04-751. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. March 16, 2005. *620 John E. … Sewell v. Doctors Hosp., 600 So.2d 577 (La.1992).

Brown v. Moss

265 S.W.2d 613 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 12, 1954

As stated in Dallas Land & Loan Co. v. … Patterson v. Patterson, Tex.Civ.App., 27 S.W. 837 .

Brown v. Klein

89 Cal. App. 153 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 9, 1928

The language used by the court in the case of Schenck v. Hartford Fire Ins. … In Lombardi v. Sinanides, 71 Cal.

State v. Brown

323 Wis. 2d 277 · Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · Dec 22, 2009

779 N.W.2d 724 (2009) 2010 WI App 19 STATE v. BROWN. No. 2008AP2883. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. December 22, 2009. Unpublished Opinion Affirmed.

State v. Brown

341 S.W.3d 216 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 17, 2011

Edward Brown (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered after a jury convicted him of trafficking in the second degree.

Brown v. Barr

184 Mo. App. 451 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 23, 1914

[Murphy v. Wilson, 44 Mo. 313 ; Gray v. McDonald, 104 Mo. 303 ; State v. Orrick, 106 Mo. 111 ; State v. Johnson, 111 Mo. 578 ; State v. Valle, 164 Mo. 539 ; Willi v. Lucas, 110 Mo. 219 ; Brouster v. Fox, 117 Mo. … [State v. Dusenberry, 112 Mo. 277 .]

Brown v. State

452 So. 2d 122 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jun 8, 1984

452 So.2d 122 (1984) Charles Anthony BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. AU-207. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. June 8, 1984. *123 Patrick H. Perry, Gainesville, for appellant. … Codie v. State, 313 So.2d 754 (Fla. 1975); Cumbie v. State, 327 So.2d 67 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976), reversed on other grounds, 345 So.2d 1061 (Fla. 1977).

State v. Brown

707 S.E.2d 263 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 24, 2011

707 S.E.2d 263 (2011) STATE v. BROWN. No. COA10-419. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. Filed January 4, 2011. Certification Date January 24, 2011. Case Reported Without Published Opinion No Error.

State v. Brown

445 S.W.2d 647 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 1969

Defendant cites Sect. 543.020 V.A.M.S. and State v. Wilkson, 36 Mo.App. 373 ; State v. Humble, 34 Mo.App. 343 ; State v. Hatfield, 40 Mo.App. 358 , and State v. Buck, 43 Mo.App. 443 . … In the case of State v.

People v. Brown

60 A.D.2d 890 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 23, 1978

When defendant exited the store, Shapiro pointed him out and, according to the patrolman, referred to defendant by his name, Milton Brown. Defendant was arrested. … Finally, we cannot say on the basis of this record, that there is no reasonable possibility that the errors might have contributed to defendant’s conviction (see People v Von Werne, 41 NY2d 584 , 588; People v Crimmins, 36

People v. Brown

287 A.D.2d 464 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 1, 2001

v Bhoje, 275 AD2d 419 ; People v Ryan, 224 AD2d 644 ). … Furthermore, the use of a showup identification procedure was permissible in view of the close spatial and temporal proximity to the crime (see, People v Duuvon, 77 NY2d 541 ; People v Herrell, 278 AD2d 339 ).

Com. v. Brown

23 A.3d 1083 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 18, 2011

23 A.3d 1083 (2011) COM. v. BROWN. No. 666 WDA 2009. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. January 18, 2011. Affirmed.

Davis v. Brown

215 A.D.2d 381 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 1, 1995

Our review of the record reveals that the prosecutor’s conduct was not intended to provoke the petitioner to move for a mistrial (see, Oregon v Kennedy, 456 US 667 ; see also, Matter of Roman v Brown, 175 AD2d 899 ). … We reject the petitioner’s contention that the mistrial was granted without his consent and over his objection (see generally, People v Ferguson, 67 NY2d 383 ).

Com. v. Brown

26 A.3d 1175 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 1, 2011

26 A.3d 1175 (2011) COM. v. BROWN. No. 1170 WDA 2009. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. March 1, 2011. Affirmed.

Brown v. State

668 S.W.2d 470 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 20, 1984

Denham v. State, 574 S.W.2d 129 (Tex.Cr.App.1978) (en banc). Words spoken by the assailant, such as threats, may be considered in determining the knife’s deadly character, Williams v. … English v. State, 647 S.W.2d 667, 669 (Tex.Cr.App.1983) (en banc).

People v. Brown

268 A.D.2d 593 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 31, 2000

731, 733 ; People v Montes, 118 AD2d 812, 813 ; People v Oliver, 96 AD2d 1104 , affd 63 NY2d 973 ). … v Montes, supra).

Brown v. Sutter

60 A.D.2d 788 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 16, 1977

"The duty to fix damages in a personal injury action is a function of the jury and, unless the amount awarded is so grossly inadequate or excessive as to be unconscionable, it should not be disturbed” (Watson v Archer, 46