Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSA

10,000+ results

2.17s

  • Brown v. Brown

    191 A.D.2d 301 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 18, 1993

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    890 S.W.2d 378 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 27, 1994

    Brown, appeals from the Jefferson County Circuit Court’s modification of the parties’ decree of dissolution as to child support. We affirm.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    65 S.W.2d 392 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 3, 1933

    Brown and wife, Carma Brown, only, the purported transfer of the lien from the Federal Land Bank to plaintiff, J. R. Brown, had been placed of record, and that thereupon, by amended' pleading, the said J. R. … Brown and F. E.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    162 A.D.2d 1018 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 22, 1990

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    245 Pa. Super. 584 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 2, 1977

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    240 Pa. Super. 702 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 13, 1976

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    26 Or. App. 239 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 26, 1976

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    65 A.D.2d 936 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 3, 1978

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    12 Ohio Law. Abs. 698 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 6, 1932

    Brown had left him does not present, we think, a strong case on the part of the plaintiff in error. The deposit, according to the testimony of Mrs. … Brown and that she received the sum above stated from said estate. While this affidavit tends to detract from the testimony of Mrs.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    230 A.D. 716 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 15, 1930

    Order denying motion of defendants Brown and Swasey for leave to serve a conditional cross complaint affirmed, without costs. … the denials contained in their answer, facts showing that tho trustee misappropriated and used in the purchase of the property in question the funds of the trust created for the appellants’ benefit by the will of Augusta Brown

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    237 A.D. 881 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 15, 1933

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    148 N.Y.S. 1107 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 5, 1914

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    163 A.D. 961 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 15, 1914

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    277 A.D.2d 857 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 13, 1950

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    216 A.D. 725 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 15, 1926

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    104 N.Y.S. 1123 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 26, 1907

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown-Thill v. Brown-Thill

    543 S.W.3d 620 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 9, 2018

    See Bugg v. Rutter , 466 S.W.3d 596 , 605 (Mo. App. 2015) (attorneys' fees and costs may be awarded under "special circumstances," such as in the case of a party's intentional misconduct); Klinkerfuss v. … Helstein v. Schmidt , 78 S.W.2d 132 , 135 (Mo. App. 1935).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    3 Willson 109 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 27, 1886

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    20 S.C. Eq. 363 · Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Feb 15, 1847

    Brown,” and in his answer to the complainant’s former bill, he not only admits the trust, but indignantly repels the insinuation that he had, at any time, disavowed his fiduciary relation.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    142 A.D.2d 624 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 11, 1988

    The Supreme Court found she was not “living with another man” and granted her cross motion for support arrears (see, Brown v Brown, supra). … v Brown, 122 AD2d 762, 764 ).

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.