Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSA

10,000+ results

2.04s

  • Chandler v. Brown

    301 S.W.2d 720 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 13, 1957

    Brown in satisfaction of a trust, even though said deed had been lost or destroyed. … Neither does the loss of a deed destroy the title of those claiming under it: Shepard v. Heirs of Cummings, 44 Tex. 502 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Butts

    214 So. 3d 1181 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Feb 12, 2016

    Holt v. Davidson, 388 So.2d 548 (Ala.1980). … See Antram v. Stuyvesant Life Ins.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    328 P.3d 187 · Colorado Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 2011

    People v. … People v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    80 Md. App. 187 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jul 7, 1989

    Patterson v. … State, 237 Md. 305 , 206 A.2d 250 (1965) ], warn the witness of the penalties of pejury or, as in Brown v. State, 220 Md. 29 [ 150 A.2d 895 ] (1959), phrase his questions in a sarcastic fashion.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    55 Okla. Crim. 11 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 9, 1933

    Burgess v. State, 18 Okla. Cr. 574 , 197 Pac. 173 ; Aubrey v. State, 38 Okla. Cr. 271 , 260 Pac. 783 ; Sharer v. State, 40 Okla.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Kimble v. Brown

    162 So. 2d 415 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Feb 13, 1964

    The word “misconduct” has frequently been defined in our jurisprudence, one of the latest expressions being that of our Supreme Court in Horns v. Brown, 243 La. 936 , 148 So.2d 607 (1963). … It must be conceded, of course, that this court is without authority to substitute its decision for that of the Board of Review if the decision of such board is predicated upon sufficient evidence to base its decision.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    29 N.C. App. 409 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 5, 1976

    Roviaro v. United States, 353 U.S. 53 , 77 S.Ct. 623 , 1 L.Ed. 2d 639 (1957) ; State v. Ketchie, 286 N.C. 387 , 211 S.E. 2d 207 (1975). … State v. Boles, 246 N.C. 83 , 97 S.E. 2d 476 (1957), decided subsequent to Roviaro . We hold that defendant received a fair trial free from prejudicial error. No error. Judges Vaughn and Arnold concur.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Meda

    74 Md. App. 331 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jun 24, 1988

    Dorothy Virginia Brown and her husband, Rudolph S. … Brown’s arm on the board at the beginning of the operation.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    2013 Ohio 2220 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 28, 2013

    [Cite as State v. Brown, 2013-Ohio-2220.] … Darden v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Brown

    314 Pa. Super. 226 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 22, 1983

    At the certification hearing held in the instant case, the court noted that as a matter of record Brown was under the jurisdiction of the State Parole Board for the arrest of robbery, which constituted a parole violation, … In State v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    363 Ill. App. 3d 838 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 16, 2006

    People v. Brown, No. 1-98-1669 (2001) (unpublished order under Supreme Court Rule 23). … Einstein v. Nijim, 358 Ill.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Marszalek v. Brown

    247 A.D.2d 827 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 4, 1998

    Brown and owned by defendant. Defendant failed to present evidence establishing as a matter of law that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury pursuant to Insurance Law § 5102 (d). … Elliott, 57 NY2d 230, 236 ; see, Tankersley v Szesnat, 235 AD2d 1010, 1013 ; Gleissner v LoPresti, 135 AD2d 494, 495 ; cf., Shames v Murtha, 204 AD2d 841 ).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Suggs

    39 A.D.3d 395 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 24, 2007

    action were previously dismissed in an order entered on defendant’s default, that order has preclusive effect since defendant deliberately refused to participate in the proceedings leading to the default dismissal (see Brown … v Suggs, 38 AD3d 329 [2007]; see also Matter of Abady, 22 AD3d 71, 84 [2005]).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Perkins

    61 So. 2d 567 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 14, 1952

    Brown, Joe Chandler, Elijah Dangerfield, William Forbes, Arthur Franklin, Henry Franklin, Solomon Myers, Eddie Smith, Freddie C. Thomas, Ernest Williams, Matthew Williams.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    314 Ga. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Feb 3, 2012

    In Palmer v. … In Bond v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    320 Ga. App. 382 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Mar 14, 2013

    ’s request and allowed him to challenge the identification procedure on cross-examination. *386 Brown relies upon Perry v. … Under Strickland v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    32 Ill. App. 3d 10 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 30, 1975

    Stat. 1973, ch. 38, § 1001 — 1—1 et seq.) and in particular the status of probation under the Code (People v. Meyer, 30 Ill.App.3d 673 , 332 N.E.2d 606 (3rd Dist. 1975); People v. … Ward v. Moran (1973), 54 Ill.2d 552 , 301 N,E.2d 300). This new position has been adopted by the Fifth District Appellate Court in several cases beginning with People v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    41 A.D.3d 261 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 21, 2007

    at 176 , quoting People v Noble, 86 NY2d 814, 815 [1995]; see also People v Patterson, 38 AD3d 431, 432 [2007]). … People v Payne, 3 NY3d 266 [2004]; People v Feingold, 7 NY3d 288 [2006]) is misplaced.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    2014 Ohio 888 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 2014

    [Cite as State v. Brown, 2014-Ohio-888.] … State v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    15 Ariz. App. 48 · Court of Appeals of Arizona · Jun 16, 1971

    BROWN: Yes. “THE COURT: —was in San Francisco giving you this information. “MR. BROWN: Yes. … State v. McCallister, 107 Ariz. 143 , 483 P.2d 558 (1971). 4 . State v. Jackson, 14 Ariz.App. 591 , 485 P.2d 580 (CR 306 filed June 7, 1971). 5 . State v. Leuck, 107 Ariz. 49 , 481 P.2d 842 (1971). 6 . State v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.