Case law

Brown v. State

22 Ala. App. 661 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Dec 13, 1927

Brown v. State

27 Ala. App. 617 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 25, 1937

People v. Brown

118 Ill. App. 3d 609 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 13, 1983

Brown, of driving with a suspended license. In its dismissal of the charge, the trial court ruled that the provisions of section 6 — 303(a) of the Illinois Vehicle Code (Ill. Rev. … (Edwards v. Hill (1849), 11 Ill. 22 .) Furthermore, the interpretation which is the most rational and sensible is the one to be adopted. (People v. Hudson (1970), 46 Ill. 2d 177 , 263 N.E.2d 473 .)

People v. Brown

249 A.D.2d 320 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 6, 1998

(see, People v Ferrara, 220 AD2d 612 ; People v Rivera, 142 AD2d 614 ). … right to a fair trial (see, People v Cooper, 173 AD2d 551 ).

State v. Brown

346 N.W.2d 187 · Court of Appeals of Minnesota · Mar 21, 1984

ANALYSIS In State v. … Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 242 , 89 S.Ct. 1709, 1711 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969) (quoting from Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U.S. 506, 516 , 82 S.Ct. 884, 890 , 8 L.Ed.2d 70 (1962)).

People v. Brown

160 A.D.2d 256 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 5, 1990

The period following his arrest on unrelated charges was excluded as he was unidentified due to his use of an alias upon his previous arrest (People v Rivera, 106 AD2d 278 ). … Nor did the court abuse its discretion in sentencing defendant (People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302, 305-306 ).

People v. Brown

13 Mich. App. 222 · Michigan Court of Appeals · Sep 4, 1968

Rodgers v. Blandon [1940], 294 Mich 699 .” The next issue on appeal questions the jury charge. The charge considered as a whole, as well as the clauses questioned in particular, were completely proper. See People v. … See GCR 1963, 516.2; McKinney v. Anderson (1964), 373 Mich 414, 420 .

Rahman v. Brown

6 A.D.3d 518 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 12, 2004

The defendants made a prima facie showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject motor vehicle accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys … ., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955 [1992]).

Brown v. Carpenter

182 A.D. 650 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 1, 1918

Brown,” signed A. G. Plant & Co. Mr. … It was brought out on the examination'of one of the defendants before trial that the defendants claim to have sold the bonds purchased by Plant the next day after they were bought and that they treated this sale of Brown

People v. Brown

256 A.D.2d 92 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 10, 1998

We find that totality of the record establishes that defendant voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waived his rights under People v Antommarchi ( 80 NY2d 247, 250 ), to be present at certain sidebar conferences with … Although the waiver was conveyed by counsel, defendant was clearly aware of his -right to be present, since he exercised that right by participating in other such conferences (People v San *93 tana, 247 AD2d 201 , lv denied

People v. Brown

222 A.D.2d 445 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 4, 1995

Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see, People v Garafolo, 44 AD2d 86, 88 ). … The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 ). Thompson, J. P., Altman, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Ordukaya v. Brown

357 N.J. Super. 231 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 31, 2003

ORDUKAYA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Paris H. BROWN, Defendant-Respondent. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Submitted December 4, 2002. Decided January 31, 2003. … Brown, and Lisa Gaye Brown, although Mrs. Brown not having any legal representation, is satisfied with the agreement. It's fair as to her in her judgment, and she's willing to be bound, and likewise, Mr. Brown is.

People v. Brown

126 A.D.2d 657 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 20, 1987

The rule mandating the exclu *658 sion of identification testimony based on an unduly suggestive showup is therefore inapplicable on the facts herein (see, People v Logan, 25 NY2d 184 ; People v Medina, 111 AD2d 190, 191 … We therefore decline to reverse the conviction on this ground, despite the fact that the challenged testimony was not technically in the nature of rebuttal (see, CPL 260.30 [7]; People v Sterling, 95 AD2d 927, 928 ).

Johnston v. Brown

468 N.E.2d 597 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Sep 27, 1984

As stated in Dibortolo v. Metropolitan Sch. … Sims v. Huntington (1979), 271 Ind. 368 , 393 N.E.2d 135 . The Johnstons rely heavily on testimony that Brown and the passenger of the truck saw the boy when they were 150 feet apart.

Brown v. State

912 So. 2d 61 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 28, 2005

912 So.2d 61 (2005) Mark BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 2D05-1625. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. September 28, 2005. *62 CASANUEVA, Judge. … We affirm the trial court's order because Brown's motion is facially insufficient. See Gilbert v.

State v. Brown

Superior Court of Delaware · Jul 9, 2024

counsel.51 In Ground Six, Brown discusses in some detail what he views as 47 Oliver v. … In Ground Three, Brown claims that defense 67 Ploof v. State, 75 A.3d 840, 852 (Del. Super. 2013) (citing Strickland v.

State v. Brown

56 N.C. App. 228 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 2, 1982

According to State v. Babb, 34 N.C. … See also State v. Maslin, 195 N.C. 537, 539 , 143 S.E. 3, 5 (1928), rev’d on other grounds, 279 N.C. 663 , 185 S.E. 2d 174 (1971); State v. Lanier, 89 N.C. 517, 519 (1883).

Brown v. Commonwealth

56 Pa. Commw. 135 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 19, 1981

OPINION by Judge Williams, Jr., This is an appeal by Harry Durst and Maye Durst, as owners of Durst Buster Brown shoe store, from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of *137 Review (Board) granting benefits to … Taylor v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 474 Pa. 351 , 378 A.2d 829 (1977).

Baker v. Brown

960 N.E.2d 237 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Dec 28, 2011

960 N.E.2d 237 (2011) BAKER v. BROWN. No. 68A05-1103-CT-122. Court of Appeals of Indiana. December 28, 2011. MATHIAS, J. Disposition of Case by Unpublished Memorandum Decision Reversed and Remanded. BAILEY, J., Concurs.

State v. Brown

326 Wis. 2d 264 · Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · May 25, 2010

787 N.W.2d 59 (2010) 2010 WI App 84 STATE v. BROWN. No. 2009AP563. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. May 25, 2010. Unpublished Opinion Affirmed.