Case law

State v. Brown

130 Mo. App. 214 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 1908

App. 612 ; State ex rel. v. Tucker, 32 Mo. App. 620 ; Leonard v. Saline Co. Court, 32 Mo. App. 633 ; State v. Kaufman, 45 Mo. App. 656 ; State v. Kampman, 75 Mo. App. 188 .] … In Hayward et al. v.

Milhon v. Brown

127 Ind. App. 694 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Jul 9, 1957

Marengo Cave Co. v. Ross (1937), 212 Ind. 624, 630 , 10 N. E. 2d 917 ; Philbin v. Carr (1920), 75 Ind. App. 560 , 129 N. … Norling v. Bailey, supra; Coal Cr. Coal Co. v. Ch., T. H. & E. Ry. Co. (1944), 114 Ind. App. 627 , 53 N. E. 2d 179 ; Philbin v. Carr, supra; Sheets v. Stiefel, supra.

Brown v. Smith

32 Tenn. App. 622 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 2, 1949

Bank of Weatherford, Tex. v. Holliday, 5 Cir., 47 F. (2d) 67; Watson Bros. Transp. Co. v. Jaffa, 8 Cir., 143 F. (2d) 340; Lennon v. Habit, 216 N. C. 141 , 4 S. E. (2d) 339 ; see Royal Blue Coaches Inc., v. … Johns River Line Co.— Purchase — Brown Motor Frt., 38 MCC 99, 102-3, and cases there cited; Raymond Bros. Motor Transp.

People v. Brown

285 A.D.2d 472 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 2, 2001

AD2d 579 ; People v Dougherty, 251 AD2d 344 ). … The trial court correctly determined that certain statements which the decedent made before his death qualified as dying declarations (see, People v Nieves, 67 NY2d 125 ; People v Harris, 180 AD2d 819 ).

Havard v. Brown

577 S.W.2d 757 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 31, 1979

Any language in the deed from the Browns to Mr. King attempting to reserve to the Browns more than a Vwth royalty would be contrary to the mutual agreement of the Browns and Mr. … King did not know nor should he have known that the Browns reserved a ½ non-participating royalty interest. The trial court disregarded these findings and granted appellees’ motion for judgment n. 0. v.

Brown v. LeBeau

250 So. 2d 568 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 30, 1971

Under the rule of Dixie Drive It Yourself Sys. v. … Gant v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, 234 So.2d 776 (La.App. 1 Cir. 1970).

Com. v. Brown

40 A.3d 189 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 9, 2011

40 A.3d 189 (2011) COM. v. BROWN. No. 1701 WDA 2010. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. December 9, 2011. Affirmed.

Fred's Stores v. Brown Ex Rel. Brown

829 So. 2d 1261 · Court of Appeals of Mississippi · Nov 5, 2002

829 So.2d 1261 (2002) FRED'S STORES OF TENNESSEE, INC., Appellant, v. Erica Louise BROWN, A Minor, By and Through her Parents, William Thomas BROWN and Tammy Marie Brown, Appellee. No. 2001-CA-01127-COA. … Crowe v. Smith, 603 So.2d 301, 305 (Miss.1992).

Sharp v. Brown

349 Ill. App. 269 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 26, 1953

On the appeal of the first trial, Sharp v. Brown, 343 Ill. Ápp. 23, a jury verdict for $17,000 was reversed by this court for the reason that plaintiff failed to offer evidence on his own due care. … Olsen v. Chicago City Ry. Co., 153 Ill. App. 75 ; Dowd v. Chicago City Ry. Co., 153 Ill. App. 85 ; Witt v. Gallemore, 163 Ill. App. 649 ; Lanham v. Illinois Central R. Co., 181 Ill. App. 63 .

Brown v. State

806 So. 2d 627 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 6, 2002

Appellant Andre Lamar Brown appeals from an order entered in the circuit court summarily denying his motion to correct illegal sentence, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). … Valdes v. State, 765 So.2d 774 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). Further, appellant did not previously raise a Hale challenge to his sentences. We reverse on the authority of Hale v.

People v. Brown

13 Mich. App. 222 · Michigan Court of Appeals · Sep 4, 1968

Rodgers v. Blandon [1940], 294 Mich 699 .” The next issue on appeal questions the jury charge. The charge considered as a whole, as well as the clauses questioned in particular, were completely proper. See People v. … See GCR 1963, 516.2; McKinney v. Anderson (1964), 373 Mich 414, 420 .

State v. Brown

616 So. 2d 124 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 24, 1993

Murphy v. … See Cross v. State, 560 So.2d 228 (Fla. 1990); P.L.R. v. State, 455 So.2d 363 (Fla. 1984); State v. Ellison, 455 So.2d 424 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); see also, McCoy v.

Clark v. Brown

656 S.W.2d 4 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 18, 1983

The defendant Brown relies heavily upon the case of Lowry v. Lowry, 541 S.W.2d 128 (Tenn.1976). … See Jones v. Jones, 185 Tenn. 586 , 206 S.W.2d 801 (1947); McLeroy v. McLeroy, et al., 163 Tenn. 124 , 40 S.W.2d 1027 (1931). For a case conceptually similar and employing the rationale followed herein, see Ison v.

State v. Brown

272 P.3d 624 · Court of Appeals of Kansas · Mar 16, 2012

272 P.3d 624 (2012) STATE v. BROWN. No. 105812. Court of Appeals of Kansas. March 16, 2012. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed in part and dismissed in part.

Brown v. State

82 So. 3d 1165 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 14, 2012

82 So.3d 1165 (2012) Deneal BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 2D09-1849. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. March 14, 2012. … Affirmed without prejudice to any right Deneal Brown might have to file a motion for postconviction relief. ALTENBERND, KELLY, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.

Papas v. Brown

88 Ill. App. 3d 471 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 11, 1980

Frye v. Woods (1972), 51 Ill. 2d 91 , 280 N.E.2d 701 ; People v. Swisher (1978), 60 Ill. App. 3d 452 , 376 N.E.2d 797 .) … In Greenbaum v.

State v. Brown

80 N.C. App. 307 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 15, 1986

State v. LeDuc, 306 N.C. 62 , 291 S.E. 2d 607 (1982). … State v. Powell, 299 N.C. 95, 99 , 261 S.E. 2d 114, 117 (1980). Voluntary manslaughter is the unlawful killing of a human being without malice, premeditation or deliberation. State v.

State v. Brown

Superior Court of Delaware · Jul 9, 2024

counsel.51 In Ground Six, Brown discusses in some detail what he views as 47 Oliver v. … In Ground Three, Brown claims that defense 67 Ploof v. State, 75 A.3d 840, 852 (Del. Super. 2013) (citing Strickland v.

Brown v. State

661 So. 2d 26 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 28, 1994

Brown v. State, 630 So.2d 227 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). The defendant has now pleaded to a lesser charge in that case. Additionally, the trial court relied on an informal calculation of Mr. … Brown’s guidelines score that does not agree with either scoresheet in the record. We cannot conclude that these errors were harmless.

Brown v. Lavine

49 A.D.2d 49 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 24, 1975

Jefferson v Hackney, 406 US 535 ). … Therefore, its issuance to petitioner of only the voucher was arbitrary and capricious under the existing circumstances (Domine v Schreck, supra).