Case law

People v. Brown

70 A.D.2d 505 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 3, 1979

Brown v. State

905 N.E.2d 439 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Apr 28, 2009

In Jaggers v. … Bradley [v.

People v. Brown

119 Cal. App. 3d 116 · California Court of Appeal · May 13, 1981

(People v. … The reference to Brown’s statement was not hearsay. Clearly it was not offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted—that Larry Cook killed Ray Brown. (People v.

People v. Brown

81 Ill. App. 3d 271 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 25, 1980

Brown. … (People v. Durr, 28 Ill. 2d 308 , 192 N.E.2d 379 ; People v. Pitts, 26 Ill. 2d 395 , 186 N.E.2d 357 .)

Roman v. Brown

175 A.D.2d 899 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 22, 1991

Our review of the relevant portions of the record reveals that the prosecutor’s conduct was not "intended to provoke the [petitioner] into moving for a mistrial” (Oregon v Kennedy, 456 US 667, 679 ). … Copeland, 127 AD2d 846, 847 ; see also, Schoendorf v Mullen, 152 AD2d 715, 716 ).

Amber Leal Brown v. Donald E. Brown

Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · Feb 10, 2005

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS AMBER LEAL BROWN, Appellant, v. DONALD E. … BROWN, Appellee. § § § § § No. 08-04-00190-CV Appeal from the 300th District Court of Brazoria County, Texas (TC# 14319*RH00) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is the Appellant’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant

Brown v. Roland

215 A.D.2d 1000 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 18, 1995

v Town of New Paltz Police Dept., 211 AD2d 894, 897-898 ; see also, Colon v City of New York, 60 NY2d 78, 82 ; Martin v City of Albany, 42 NY2d 13, 16 ), and a pretrial determination of probable cause, as was made here, … creates a presumption of probable cause (see, Landsman v Moss, 133 AD2d 359, 360 ; Gisondi v Town of Harrison, 120 AD2d 48, 53 , affd 72 NY2d 280 ; Testa v Federated Dept.

State v. Brown

96 Or. App. 171 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 12, 1989

State v. Kennedy, 295 Or 260 , 666 P2d 1316 (1983). … See Higgins v. Redding, 34 Or App 1029, 1034 , 580 P2d 580 , rev den 284 Or 80a (1978).

Brown v. Cohan

254 A.D. 20 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 27, 1938

(Hoffman v. Grobsmith, 129 Misc. 91 ; affd., 222 App. Div. 793 ; Haniford v. Safer, 214 id. 435; Clark v. MacDonald, 62 Hun, 149 ; Parker v. City of New York, 122 Misc. 660 .) The Court of Appeals in Salimoff & Co. v.

Brown v. State

146 Ga. App. 286 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Jun 19, 1978

Hollis v. State, 137 Ga. App. 298 ( 223 SE2d 491 ). 2. … Johnson v. State, 139 Ga. App. 829 (1) ( 229 SE2d 772 ).

Batiste v. Brown

11 La.App. 5 Cir. 609 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jan 24, 2012

Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council 5747, 2003-1583 (La.2/20/04), 866 So.2d 228 . … Hines v. Garrett, 2004-0806 (La.6/25/04), 876 So.2d 764 . The sections of the Louisiana Products Liability Act applicable here are La.

Brown v. State

145 So. 3d 883 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jun 27, 2014

Brown’s friend as well as Mr. Brown’s argument *884 that the shooting was self-defense. The State argued that Mr. … Brown guilty of second-degree murder or manslaughter were whether his friend shot the victim or, if not, whether Mr. Brown’s actions were justified as self-defense. Based on the reasoning of Richards v.

Brown v. Affonso

185 Cal. App. 2d 235 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 11, 1960

(See Oppenheimer v. Deutchman (1953), 119 Cal.App.2d 450, 454 [ 259 P.2d 457 ]; LeBlanc v. Browne (1947), 78 Cal.App.2d 63, 75 [ 177 P.2d 347 ].) … (Daggett v. Atchison, T. & S.F. Ry. Co., supra, 48 Cal.2d 655, 665-666 .) Plaintiff did not ask the court for such a limited instruction. In Adkins v.

Commonwealth v. Brown

96 Pa. Super. 13 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 1929

Brown at the Reading National Bank and signed by Myrtle Brown Lease, (which turned out to be a forgery). The defendant was indebted to the Reading National Bank in a large sum of money. … Superior Ct. 205 ; Com. v. Ernesto, 93 Pa. Superior Ct. 339 ; Com. v. Wilson, 14 Phila. 384 , 391; Com. v. Parr, 5 W. & S. 345 . Forgery is the fraudulent making of any writing to the prejudice of another’s right.

People v. Brown

169 Cal. App. 3d 728 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 25, 1985

We find, under Carlos v. Superior Court, supra, 35 Cal.3d 131 , and People v. … (People v. Turner, supra, 37 Cal.3d 302, 328-329 .) Ex Post Facto Application of Penal Code Section 667.6 Brown’s crimes were committed in 1979.

Brown v. Tropp

106 Cal. App. 605 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 20, 1930

the address of said Theodore Brown; that this affiant believed that one Carroll Allen, attorney in the city of Los Angeles, was acquainted with said Theodore Brown and said Theodore Brown’s address, being unknown to the … (Hill v. Smith, 260 U. S. 592 [ 67 L. Ed. 419 , 43 Sup. Ct. Rep. 219]; Miller v. Guasti, 226 U. S. 170 [ 57 L. Ed. 173 , 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 49]; Santa Rosa Bank v. White, 139 Cal. 703 [ 73 Pac. 577 ].)

Brown v. State

228 Ga. App. 748 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Oct 8, 1997

See Hill v. State, 246 Ga. 402, 405 (III) ( 271 SE2d 802 ) (1980). We disagree with Brown’s conclusion. … See Phillips v. State, 215 Ga. App. 526 (2), 527 ( 451 SE2d 517 ) (1994); see generally Echols v. State, 187 Ga. App. 870 ( 371 SE2d 682 ) (1988). Brown filed no such timely written motion.

Randolph v. Brown

21 Tex. Civ. App. 617 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 28, 1899

See Brown v. Hudson, 14 Texas Oiv. App., 605. … Holloway v. Cabell, 3 Texas Civ. App., 320.

Brown v. State

164 So. 2d 34 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 20, 1964

See Austin v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 160 So.2d 730 . The order denying relief is therefore affirmed. SMITH, C. J., and ALLEN and ANDREWS, JJ., concur.

Bird v. Brown

157 Pa. Super. 49 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 5, 1945

The board affirmed the referee’s findings and conclusions. The award entered was upheld by the court of common pleas. This appeal followed. … Concededly, an accident cannot be inferred merely from an injury (Adamchick v.