Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSA

10,000+ results

5.25s

  • Johnson v. Brown

    157 So. 2d 259 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Oct 30, 1963

    Green v. Brown, Administrator, et al., (La.App., 2 Cir., 1962), 147 So.2d 406 . … The case is remanded to the Board of Review for additional evidence to be taken, in agency proceedings, with the Board of Review to make such findings after appropriate administrative proceedings as the original record and

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Dunlap

    6 A.D.3d 159 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 1, 2004

    Melamed completely failed to address defendants’ medical evidence attributing the condition of plaintiffs lumbar spine to a preexisting degenerative condition (see Shinn v Catanzaro, 1 AD3d 195, 198 [2003]; Lorthe v Adeyeye … Rosario v Universal Truck & Trailer Serv., 2 AD3d 362 [2003]; Williams v Parke, 1 AD3d 240 [2003]; Ramos v Dekhtyar, 301 AD2d 428, 429 [2003]; Manrique v Warshaw Woolen Assoc., 297 AD2d 519, 520-521 [2002]; Bitici v New York

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Nagle

    118 Pa. Super. 234 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 13, 1934

    Bowser, 82 Pa. 57 ; Earnest’s Appeal, 106 Pa. 310 ; Besterman v. Besterman et al., 263 Pa. 555 , 107 A. 323 ; Gassner v. Gassner, 280 Pa. 313 , 124 A. 483 ; and Buckwalter Stove Co. v. … In Watkins v. Prudential Ins. Co., 315 Pa. 497 , 173 A. 644 , cited and reaffirmed in Walters v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    102 A.D.3d 521 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 17, 2013

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    102 A.D.3d 521 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 17, 2013

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    195 Mo. App. 590 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 1917

    [State v. Smallwood, 68 Mo. 192 ; State v. Mann, 83 Mo. 589 ; State v. Mitchell; 237 Mo. 212 .] These cases did not involve the objection here, but we think they bear upon it. In State v. … Brown, 181 Mo. 192, 229 , the court said that it was, “The practice not to arrest judgment on the ground of irregularity in the summoning or the procedure of the grand jury.”

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    48 So. 3d 614 · Court of Appeals of Mississippi · Oct 26, 2010

    Shanklin v. State, 290 So.2d 625, 627 (Miss.1974). Furthermore, it is well-settled law that the jury determines the credibility of witnesses and resolves any conflicts in the evidence. Riley v. … See Moore v. State, 933 So.2d 910, 922 (¶41) (Miss.2006); Chaney v. State, 802 So.2d 113, 115 (¶ 9) (Miss.Ct.App.2001). ¶ 10.

    Overruled in part by Ladd v. State, 2012 Miss. App. LEXIS 239 (2012)Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Lyon v. Brown

    31 A.D. 67 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1898

    Brown, in his transactions, used the first personal pronoun, I or my, it meant Mary Brown, the defendant, and not Sylvanus D. Brown. That was objected to, and the defendant’s counsel excepted. … Brown was never known in the matter until papers were brought with her name upon them ; and that the title to the property being in the name of Mary Brown, S. D.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Bennett

    136 S.W.3d 552 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 2004

    Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). … Little v. Morris, 967 S.W.2d 685, 686 (Mo.App.1998).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    85 Wis. 2d 341 · Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · Sep 7, 1978

    Brown, was convicted of armed robbery on July 19, 1973 and was sentenced to the Wisconsin State prison system for an indeterminate term not to exceed 25 years. … Peterson v. State, 54 Wis.2d 370, 381 , 195 N.W.2d 837 (1972); Cf. Smith v. State, 63 Wis.2d 496 , 217 N.W.2d 257 (1974).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Serra v. Brown

    192 So. 3d 684 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jun 3, 2016

    ) Case No. 2D15-593 ) MARY BROWN, ) ) … See Dep't of Revenue v. Marchines, 974 So. 2d 1085, 1088 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); Goldberg v. Watts, 864 So. 2d 59, 60 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Mason v. Highlands Cty.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    167 Wash. App. 1037 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Apr 16, 2012

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    2012 La.App. 4 Cir. 0587 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Feb 27, 2013

    In State v. … In State v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    66 So. 3d 1046 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 3, 2011

    Brown, you can, it’s a private attorney. You can discharge your attorney for no reason whatsoever if you want to. You don’t have to have a reason.” … Nelson v. State, 274 So.2d 256 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    274 A.D.2d 941 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 7, 2000

    Kelly, 261 AD2d 133 , lv denied 94 NY2d 824 ; People v Foster, supra; People v Raymond, 187 AD2d 463 , lv denied 81 NY2d 793 ). … v Westbrook, 177 AD2d 1039, 1040 , lv denied 79 NY2d 866 ).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    392 So. 2d 113 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Oct 6, 1980

    BROWN v. STATE of Louisiana, etc., et al. No. 13584. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. October 6, 1980. *114 Garic K. Barranger, Covington, for plaintiff-appellant Walter H. Brown. Thomas F. … Moreau v. Department of Corrections, 333 So.2d 281 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1976); Dancer v. Department of Corrections, 282 So.2d 730 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1973).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    297 A.D.2d 819 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 30, 2002

    However, inasmuch as the defendant failed to object to any portion of the prosecutor’s summation and/or seek a mistrial at the conclusion thereof, this argument is also unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Bruen

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Brown

    70 A.D.2d 873 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 4, 1979

    In view of the potential prejudice and the inexcusable delay, the plaintiffs’ motion should have been denied because of gross laches (see De Fabio v Nadler Rental Serv., 27 AD2d 931 ). … Finally, the motion papers are insufficient because they do not include a physician’s affidavit (see Colonel v Targee Contr. Co., 65 Ad2d 720; White v Jewish Hosp. & Med. Center of Brooklyn, 60 AD2d 627 ). Lazer, J.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    128 So. 3d 254 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 11, 2013

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hicks v. Brown

    128 S.W.2d 884 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 1, 1939

    Co. v. … Co. v. Brown, Tex.Civ.App., 97 S.W.2d 335 ; Dallas Ry. & Ter. Co. v. Redman, Tex.Civ.App., 113 S.W.2d 262 , and the case of Dallas Ry. & Ter. Co. v. Price, supra.

    Modified by Hicks v. Brown, 136 Tex. 399 (1941)Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.