Case law

Richardson v. Brown

2012 Ark. App. 535 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 26, 2012

Pine Meadow Autoflex, LLC v. … Robinson v. Villines, 2009 Ark. 632 , 362 S.W.3d 870 .

Crafton v. Brown

346 S.C. 347 · Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Jul 9, 2001

Brown cites Iseman v. Hobbs 7 in support of his argument that parol evidence was properly admitted in this case. … See Ray v.

State v. Brown

195 Mo. App. 590 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 1917

[State v. Smallwood, 68 Mo. 192 ; State v. Mann, 83 Mo. 589 ; State v. Mitchell; 237 Mo. 212 .] These cases did not involve the objection here, but we think they bear upon it. In State v. … Brown, 181 Mo. 192, 229 , the court said that it was, “The practice not to arrest judgment on the ground of irregularity in the summoning or the procedure of the grand jury.”

Brown v. State

232 Ga. App. 787 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Jun 4, 1998

See Brown v. State, 247 Ga. 298, 302 (9) (275 *789 SE2d 52) (1981). 2 The two offenses share no essential elements. … Levin v. State, 222 Ga. App. 123 ( 473 SE2d 582 ) (1996). 5 We note that the charging conference was not transcribed, and Brown placed no objection on the record relating thereto. See Jackson v. State, 213 Ga.

Brown v. State

48 So. 3d 614 · Court of Appeals of Mississippi · Oct 26, 2010

Shanklin v. State, 290 So.2d 625, 627 (Miss.1974). Furthermore, it is well-settled law that the jury determines the credibility of witnesses and resolves any conflicts in the evidence. Riley v. … See Moore v. State, 933 So.2d 910, 922 (¶41) (Miss.2006); Chaney v. State, 802 So.2d 113, 115 (¶ 9) (Miss.Ct.App.2001). ¶ 10.

State v. Brown

996 S.W.2d 719 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 25, 1999

State v. Brown, 660 S.W.2d 694, 699 (Mo. banc 1983). … V.

State v. Brown

167 Wash. App. 1037 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Apr 16, 2012

Brown v. Nagle

118 Pa. Super. 234 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 13, 1934

Bowser, 82 Pa. 57 ; Earnest’s Appeal, 106 Pa. 310 ; Besterman v. Besterman et al., 263 Pa. 555 , 107 A. 323 ; Gassner v. Gassner, 280 Pa. 313 , 124 A. 483 ; and Buckwalter Stove Co. v. … In Watkins v. Prudential Ins. Co., 315 Pa. 497 , 173 A. 644 , cited and reaffirmed in Walters v.

Brown v. Bronson

93 A.D. 312 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 15, 1904

(Markham v. Jaudon, 41 N. Y. 235 .) … The earliest of these is Roberts v.

People v. Brown

102 A.D.3d 521 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 17, 2013

People v. Brown

102 A.D.3d 521 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 17, 2013

People v. Brown

167 A.D.2d 346 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 5, 1990

Lomax, 50 NY2d 351 ; cf., People v Santos, 68 NY2d 859 ; People v Berkowitz, 50 NY2d 333 ; People v Montes, 151 AD2d 700 ). … Brown, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Brown v. State

66 So. 3d 1046 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 3, 2011

Brown, you can, it’s a private attorney. You can discharge your attorney for no reason whatsoever if you want to. You don’t have to have a reason.” … Nelson v. State, 274 So.2d 256 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973).

Trout v. Brown

125 Ind. App. 381 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Jan 24, 1954

Lowe’s Revision of Works’ Indiana Practice, Vol. 2, p. 11, §17.10; Newkirk and Another v. Neild (1862), 19 Ind. 194 ; Durbin v. Northwestern Scraper Co. (1905), 36 Ind. App. 123 , 73 N. … Standley v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company (1883), 95 *387 Ind. 254; Brower et al. v. Nellis et al. (1892), 6 Ind. App. 323 , 33 N. E. 672 . Appellants rely upon the case of Jennings v. Bond (1895), 14 Ind.

Brown v. Hooks

33 Tex. Civ. App. 243 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 15, 1903

Brown v. State

128 So. 3d 254 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 11, 2013

Hicks v. Brown

128 S.W.2d 884 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 1, 1939

Co. v. … Co. v. Brown, Tex.Civ.App., 97 S.W.2d 335 ; Dallas Ry. & Ter. Co. v. Redman, Tex.Civ.App., 113 S.W.2d 262 , and the case of Dallas Ry. & Ter. Co. v. Price, supra.

Brown v. State

574 S.W.2d 501 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 27, 1978

The direct appeal from the convictions was upheld by this court in State v. Brown, 525 S.W.2d 565 (Mo.App.1975) but the cause was remanded for resentence under the principle of State v. … State v. Brown, supra, 525 S.W.2d l.c. 567[3]. Whether the lapse constituted ineffective assistance of counsel remains another matter.

Borne v. Brown

492 So. 2d 6 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 4, 1986

492 So.2d 6 (1986) Clifton BORNE v. Eunice Borne BROWN, Louise Poth Borne and Ronald Borne. No. CA 84-1118. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. May 28, 1986. Dissenting Opinion June 4, 1986. … Under these circumstances, we apply the adverse inference or presumption principle against defendants Eunice Borne Brown, Louise Poth and Ronald Borne. Hayes v.

Brown v. State

74 Md. App. 414 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Mar 4, 1988

Brown and Tyrus T. Brown, appellants, *416 of the theft of several typewriters and word processors from the Arundel Office Equipment Store on April 18, 1986. … Tony Brown died prior to appellants’ trial.