Case law

Borne v. Brown

492 So. 2d 6 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 4, 1986

492 So.2d 6 (1986) Clifton BORNE v. Eunice Borne BROWN, Louise Poth Borne and Ronald Borne. No. CA 84-1118. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. May 28, 1986. Dissenting Opinion June 4, 1986. … Under these circumstances, we apply the adverse inference or presumption principle against defendants Eunice Borne Brown, Louise Poth and Ronald Borne. Hayes v.

Pilarowski v. Brown

76 Mich. App. 666 · Michigan Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 1977

Subsequently, plaintiff appealed Brown’s decision to the Macomb County Board of Health which stated, in part, the following in upholding Brown’s decision: *673 "It is therefore readily obvious that any person occupying such … Brown.

Brown v. State

299 Ga. App. 402 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Jul 1, 2009

Rainey v. State, 286 Ga. App. 682 ( 649 SE2d 871 ) (2007). … See OCGA § 3-3-23 (b) (2), (c); see also Hanson v.

Brown v. Null

863 S.W.2d 425 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 30, 1993

Smith v. Bullington, Tenn.App.1973, 499 S.W.2d 649 . … Whittemore v. Classen, 808 S.W.2d 447 (Tenn.App.1991).

Bodine v. Brown

42 N.Y.S. 202 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 11, 1896

The primary meaning of the word “issue” includes all descendants (Drake v. Drake, 134 N. Y. 224 , 32 N. E. 114 ), but would not include the heirs, at law of a person dying without children. … Bisson v. Railroad Co., 143 N. Y. 128 , 38 N. E. 104 . We have carefully examined the codicils to the will, but find nothing in them that will tend to indicate that the testator had a different intention.

Commonwealth v. Brown

55 Mass. App. Ct. 440 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Jul 16, 2002

The defendant, Felicia Brown, appeals from a conviction of peijury based on testimony she gave to a grand *441 jury investigating the shooting of her cousin, Christopher Robinson. … Commonwealth v. McCarthy, 385 Mass. at 162 -163 & n.5. See Commonwealth v.

Thompson v. Brown

50 Mo. App. 314 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 30, 1892

Ring v. Jameson, 2 Mo. App. 584 ; s. c., 66 Mo. 428 ; Harrison v. Hall, 8 Mo. App. 167 ; Loeffel v. Hors, 11 Mo. App. 133 ; Raglan v. Steamboat, 40 Mo. 244 ; Vito Viti v. Dixon, 12 Mo. 315 ; Fulton Iron Works v. … Harrison v. Hall, supra; Hall’s Ex’r Case, 48 Pa. St. 24.

Cook v. Brown

393 So. 2d 1016 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Jan 21, 1981

See Federal Land Bank of New Orleans v. Bridgeforth , 233 Ala. 679 , 173 So. 66 (1937); Keeble v. Keeble , 85 Ala. 552 , 5 So. 149 (1888); Lobman v. Sawyer , 37 Ala. … See Shahan v. Brown , 167 Ala. 534 , 52 So. 737 (1910); Mid-State Homes, Inc. v. Holt , 52 Ala. App. 415 , 293 So.2d 476 (1974).

Commonwealth v. Brown

212 Pa. Super. 716 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 10, 1968

Brown v. Judge

77 Pa. Super. 106 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 14, 1921

In such a case no distribution is needed, and the appellee might assert her rights to the property by an action in her own name: McLean’s Executors v. Wade, 53 Pa. 150 . Mary M. … Schroeder, 221 Pa. 152 ; Green & Sons v. Bauer, 15 Pa. Superior Ct. 372 . The judgment is reversed and a venire facias de novo awarded.

State v. Brown

167 Wash. App. 1045 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Apr 23, 2012

Brown v. Rechel

108 Ohio App. 347 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 9, 1959

Cohen v. Bucey, 158 Ohio St., 159 , 107 N. E. (2d), 333. See also: Schweinfurth, Admr., v. C., C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co., 60 Ohio St., 215 , 54 N. E., 89 . While Cohen v. … The challenged complaint read, in substance, that the plaintiff was the administrator of the estate of his son, Jerome Paul Brown, deceased, and the action was one seeking damages for pecuniary loss to the next of kin; that

State v. Brown

260 Wis. 2d 125 · Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · Jan 2, 2003

See Hotzel v. … See, e.g., State v.

State v. Brown

28 S.W.3d 609 · Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · Aug 3, 2000

Appellee, Frank Brown, also known as Frank Sanspree, was charged with capital murder in Grimes County. He moved to suppress two oral statements he made during his arraignment. The trial court granted the motion. … See State v. Riewe, 13 S.W.3d 408, 411 (Tex.Crim.App.2000); State v. Muller, 829 S.W.2d 805, 812-13 (Tex.Crim.App.1992). The court has recently held that the certification requirement of article 44.01 is jurisdictional.

Amanda Latrice Brown v. Gregory Fitzgerald Brown

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · Jan 12, 2012

In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-11-00036-CV AMANDA LATRICE BROWN, Appellant V. … MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Amanda Latrice Brown brings this restricted appeal from a default judgment in the divorce action filed by appellee Gregory Fitzgerald Brown.

People v. Brown

195 A.D.2d 967 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 16, 1993

Defendant’s conduct was sufficiently unique to be considered by the jury on the issue of identity (see, People v Smith, 63 NY2d 41, 64-65 , cert denied 469 US 1227 ; People v Allweiss, 48 NY2d 40, 47-48 ; People v Rossman … his ability to defend (see, People v Morales, 80 NY2d 450, 457 ).

Owens v. State

507 So. 2d 576 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Apr 14, 1987

To comport with due process, a state disciplinary board's decision must not have been made arbitrarily or capriciously, but must have been based upon substantial evidence. Rice v. … Wolff v. McDonnell; Rice v. State; Washington v. State.

Rice v. Brown

104 Cal. App. 2d 100 · California Court of Appeal · May 9, 1951

Brown was between respondent and Jack A. Brown but that later, on January 26, 1946, the defendant William A. Brown came into the enterprise. The whole arrangement between these parties came to end on August 1, 1946. … (Goodrich and Myers v. Mayor and Common Council of Marysville, 5 Cal. 430, 431 .) ” Appellants contend that the court erred in finding against their contention that an account was stated between the parties.

People v. Brown

176 A.D.2d 641 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 24, 1991

advise him of his right to testify before the Grand Jury, or to request a hearing at which such attorney’s testimony could be compelled, it was not error for the trial court to deny the motion without a hearing (see, People v

Stevens v. Brown

249 A.D.2d 909 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 29, 1998

“[T]he court has broad discretionary powers in applying” CPLR 3101 (d) (1) (i) (Peck v Tired Iron Transp., 209 AD2d 979 ; see also, Schwartz v Tab Operating Co., 239 AD2d 244 ). … Palm Beach Club, 244 AD2d 904 , 906; see also, Austin v Knowlton, 234 AD2d 918 ).