Case law

Brown v. State

129 Ga. App. 743 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Sep 27, 1973

While Brown says he stayed on the back seat and passed out and knew nothing of their ride (which, if undisputed, would have brought him within the ruling in Lash v. State, 97 Ga. … Tatum v. State, 1 Ga. App. 778 ( 57 SE 956 ); Williams v. State, 125 Ga. 741 ( 54 SE 661 ); Bines v. State, 118 Ga. 320 ( 45 SE 376 ); Brown v. State, 15 Ga. App. 484 ( 83 SE 890 ); Edwards v.

Rice v. Brown

104 Cal. App. 2d 100 · California Court of Appeal · May 9, 1951

Brown was between respondent and Jack A. Brown but that later, on January 26, 1946, the defendant William A. Brown came into the enterprise. The whole arrangement between these parties came to end on August 1, 1946. … (Goodrich and Myers v. Mayor and Common Council of Marysville, 5 Cal. 430, 431 .) ” Appellants contend that the court erred in finding against their contention that an account was stated between the parties.

Mimms v. Brown

2002 La.App. 4 Cir. 1681 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Sep 3, 2003

Brown is jeopardizing her son’s education based on his allegation that she is keeping the child out of school in order to thwart Mr. Mimms’ ability to exercise his visitation rights. In Evans v. … Bergeron v. Bergeron, 492 So.2d 1193, 1200 (La.1986), reh’g denied (Sept. 11, 1986).

Stevens v. Brown

249 A.D.2d 909 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 29, 1998

“[T]he court has broad discretionary powers in applying” CPLR 3101 (d) (1) (i) (Peck v Tired Iron Transp., 209 AD2d 979 ; see also, Schwartz v Tab Operating Co., 239 AD2d 244 ). … Palm Beach Club, 244 AD2d 904 , 906; see also, Austin v Knowlton, 234 AD2d 918 ).

People v. Brown

66 A.D.2d 158 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 19, 1979

legal assistance by the conduct of the District Attorney in concealing Brown’s whereabouts from Stirpe (see People v Bevilacqua, 45 NY2d 508 ; People v Pinzon, 44 NY2d 458 ; People v Townsend, 33 *161 NY2d 37 ). … People v Hobson, 39 NY2d 479 ; People v Hetherington, 27 NY2d 242 ).

Brown v. State

693 P.2d 324 · Court of Appeals of Alaska · Dec 21, 1984

However, Morris and Brown have simply misinterpreted the scope of the corroboration requirement set forth in AS 12.45.020. In Oxenberg v. … Accordingly, a remand will be necessary to permit the sentencing court to explain Brown’s sentence more fully. See Soroka v. State, 598 P.2d 69, 71 (Alaska 1979); Andrews v.

Long v. Brown

593 S.W.2d 371 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 21, 1979

Broady v. Mitchell, 572 S.W.2d 36, 42 (Tex.Civ.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1978, writ ref’d n.r.e.); Roselawn Cemetery, Inc. v. Martin, 415 S.W.2d 442 (Tex.Civ.App.—San Antonio 1967, no writ); Best Building Co. v. … Nelson v. Jenkins, 214 S.W.2d 140, 143 (Tex.Civ.App.—El Paso 1948, writ ref’d); Eagle Pass Lumber Co. v. The Amortibanc, 124 S.W.2d 186, 187 (Tex.Civ.App.—San Antonio 1939, no writ); Herbert v.

People v. Brown

9 A.D.3d 884 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 9, 2004

In addition, defendant asked relevant questions during that proceeding and responded appropriately to the court’s questions (see People v Planty, 238 AD2d 806, 807 [1997], lv denied 89 NY2d 1098 [1997]; People v Hall, 168 … Carbonel, 296 AD2d 858 , 858 [2002], quoting People v Gelikkaya, 84 NY2d 456, 460 [1994]).

Brown v. State

395 S.W.3d 83 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 9, 2013

The movant, Deraughn Brown, appeals the motion court’s order denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing.

State v. Brown

160 N.J. Super. 227 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 26, 1978

Super. 227 (1978) 389 A.2d 507 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. LARRY BROWN, RODNEY MOULTON, WILLIAM ODEL WALKER, DEFENDANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division (Criminal). Decided May 26, 1978. *228 Mr. … Defendant Larry Brown states that he was merely dozing when the vehicle was stopped by Trooper Drummond.

Brown v. Lawler

130 Ill. App. 540 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 13, 1906

La Berry v. … In Howe v.

Brown v. People

24 Ill. App. 72 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Nov 23, 1887

Thomas v. People, 13 Ill. 696 ; Kennedy v. People, 15 Ill. 418 ; Cable v. People, 46 Ill. 467 ; Banta v. People, 53 Ill. 434 ; Farris v. People, 58 Ill. 26 . … the day named in the reognizance, Goldstein (the principal) being then and there three times solemnly called to answer the charge preferred against him, came not, nor anybody for him, but therein made default; and that Brown

Parker v. Brown

13 Cal. App. 2d 501 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 28, 1936

(Stirnus v. Adams, 50 Cal. App. 730 [ 195 Pac. 955 ].) … (Marr v. Whistler, 49 Cal. App. 364, 370 [ 193 Pac. 600 ]; Work v. Whittington, 61 Cal. App. 302, 303 [214 Pac. 474]; Rosenberg v. Moore & Co., 194 Cal. 392, 396 [ 229 Pac. 34 ]; Clark v. Rauer, 2 Cal.

People v. Brown

159 A.D.2d 956 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 16, 1990

Shortridge, 65 NY2d 309 , 313; People v Maerling, 46 NY2d 289, 298-299 ). … Barnes, 50 NY2d 375, 380 ; People v Sabella, 35 NY2d 158, 168 ).

Brown v. Meyer

580 S.W.2d 533 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 21, 1979

Probst v. Seyer, 353 S.W.2d 798 [2] (Mo.1962). “Substantial evidence” is that which has probative force upon the issues and from which the jury can reasonably decide the case on the fact issues. Zeigenbein v. … Smith v. Allied Supermarkets, Inc., 524 S.W.2d 848 [2] (Mo. banc 1975). Defendant’s evidence contradictory or unfavorable to plaintiff’s contentions must be disregarded. Bateman v.

Brown v. Commonwealth

22 Va. App. 316 · Court of Appeals of Virginia · Apr 23, 1996

Brown v. Commonwealth, 246 Va. 460 , 437 S.E.2d 563 (1993). When Brown was tried a third time, he was convicted by a jury of second degree murder. … Manetta v.

Brown v. Little

341 S.W.3d 275 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 20, 2009

Brown (“Petitioner”) was an inmate at the Turney Center Industrial Prison (“TCIP”) in Hickman County, Tennessee. … Brown and his surety.

People v. Brown

269 A.D.2d 539 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 22, 2000

The defendant was present during the voir dire and when the challenges were given effect in open court (see, People v Velasco, 77 NY2d 469 ; People v Harris, 212 AD2d 631 ). *540 The court did not err in denying the defendant … ’s motion to set aside the verdict on the ground of juror misconduct without conducting a hearing (see, People v Anderson, 249 AD2d 405 ).

King v. Brown

221 N.J. Super. 270 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 16, 1987

Moreover, the Brown vehicle was not part of the *274 jughandle traffic. … Schapiro v. Essex County Freeholder Board, 177 N.J. Super. 87 (Law Div. 1980), aff'd. 183 N.J. Super. 24 (App.Div. 1982), aff'd 91 N.J. 430 (1982).

Stegmuller v. Brown

216 A.D.2d 23 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 6, 1995

(See, e.g., Matter of Gumbrecht v McGuire, 117 AD2d 531 .) Neither the Medical Board nor the Board of Trustees were required to identify the actual cause of the heart condition at issue. … (See, Matter of Goldman v McGuire, 101 AD2d 768 ; see also, Matter of Bagarozza v McGuire, 100 AD2d 986 , affd 64 NY2d 1043 .)