Case law

Brown v. State

11 Okla. Crim. 498 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 15, 1915

In Tucker v. State, 10 Okla. … Colbert v. State, 4 Okla. Cr. 500 , 113 Pac. 558 .

People v. Brown

35 Cal. App. 4th 1585 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 22, 1995

Relying on People v. Davis (1994) 7 Cal.4th 797 [ 30 Cal.Rptr.2d 50 , 872 P.2d 591 ], Brown argues the Supreme Court has tacitly overruled its prior decision of Keeler v. … .” *1593 Brown’s reliance on People v.

Engle v. Brown

202 Mo. App. 345 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 1919

We think that the agreement whereby the defendants were released and Lobdell accepted in their place on the note would be sufficient to show a novation (Brown v. Kirk, 20 Mo. App. 524 ; Garrison v. O’Donald, 73 Mo. … [Baldwin v. Daly, 41 Wash. 416 ; Pitt v. Little, 58 Wash, 355, 358; Leask v. Dew, 92 N. Y. Suppl. 891.]

People v. Brown

209 A.D.2d 428 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 7, 1994

Each of these alleged errors is unpreserved for appellate review as the defendant failed to raise any objection to the charge in the trial court (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245 ). … ; People v Green, 154 AD2d 616 ).

McClintic v. Brown

212 S.W. 540 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 22, 1919

Dees v. Thompson, 166 S. W. 56 ; American, etc., v. Mercedes Plantation Co., 155 S. W. 286 ; Cooney v. Dandridge, 158 S. W. 177 ; Moore v. Rabb, 159 S. W. 85 ; City of Ft. Worth v. Burton, 193 S. W. 228 ; Craver v. … We think the rule to be held in Kolp v. Shrader, and Douglas v. Baker, supra. In Hagood v.

Brown v. Goldstein

678 S.W.2d 539 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 31, 1984

Garza v. Alviar, 395 S.W.2d 821 (Tex.1965). … Yarborough v. Berner, 467 S.W.2d 188, 191 (Tex.1971); Foley’s Department Store v. Gardner, 588 S.W.2d 627, 629 (Tex.Civ.App. [14th Dist.] 1979, no writ). Appellant denied causing the accident.

State v. Brown

160 N.J. Super. 227 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 26, 1978

Super. 227 (1978) 389 A.2d 507 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. LARRY BROWN, RODNEY MOULTON, WILLIAM ODEL WALKER, DEFENDANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division (Criminal). Decided May 26, 1978. *228 Mr. … Defendant Larry Brown states that he was merely dozing when the vehicle was stopped by Trooper Drummond.

Brown v. Kemp

71 Ind. App. 281 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Nov 4, 1919

E. 475 ; American Maize Products Co. v. Widiger (1917), 186 Ind. 227 , 114 N. E. 457 ; LaPlante v. State, ex rel. (1899), 152 Ind. 80 , 52 N. E. 452 ; American Trust, etc., Bank v. … St. 345; Bowser, Admr., v. Mattler (1894), 137 Ind. 649 , 35 N. E. 701 , 36 N. E. 714 ; Frazer v. State (1886), 106 Ind. 471 , 7 N. E. 203 ; White v. Suggs (1914), 56 Ind. App. 572 , 104 N.

Brown v. Commonwealth

22 Va. App. 316 · Court of Appeals of Virginia · Apr 23, 1996

Brown v. Commonwealth, 246 Va. 460 , 437 S.E.2d 563 (1993). When Brown was tried a third time, he was convicted by a jury of second degree murder. … Manetta v.

People v. Brown

195 A.D.2d 1055 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 16, 1993

, 80 NY2d 981, 982 , rearg denied 81 NY2d 759 ; People v Dokes, 79 NY2d 656, 662 ; People v Young, 195 AD2d 1041 [decided herewith]; People v Towndrow, 187 AD2d 194, 197 ). … Thus, defendant returned "to the status of one who is not under the influence of questioning” (People v Chappie, 38 NY2d 112, 115 ).

Ing v. Brown

3 Md. Ch. 521 · High Court of Chancery of Maryland · Jul 15, 1850

Those conveyances are assailed by the complainant, as the permanent trustee in insolvency of Brown, the grantor, upon the ground of fraud under the statute of Elizabeth, and as having been made in derogation of our insolvent … It has been urged that there is a contradiction or manifest inconsistency between the affidavit made by Brown to the first conveyance, and his answer to the bill.

Brown v. Soupenne

416 So. 2d 170 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · May 11, 1982

Brown fell through weak or rotten boards in the building or through a pre-existing hole in the floor, it is clear to this court that either instance is a "ruin" contemplated by Article 2322. … See Sampay v. Morton Salt Co., 395 So.2d 326 (La.1981). Foster v. Hampton, 381 So.2d 789 (La.1980).

Brown v. Wrightman

5 Cal. App. 391 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 15, 1907

(Quatman v. McCray, 128 Cal. 285 , [ 60 Pac. 855 ]; see, also, Reclamation Dist. v. Sets, 145 Cal. 184 , [ 78 Pac. 638 ].) The waiver and estoppel found by the superior court are-sustained by numerous cases. … In Duncan v. Central Pass. R. R. Co., 85 Ky. 525 , [ 4 S.

People v. Brown

104 A.D.2d 1044 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 29, 1984

First, a portion of the tape is substantially inaudible, and should have been excluded for that reason alone (see People v Mincey, 64 AD2d 615 ). … In these circumstances, providing a transcript, which is normally permissible (see People v Feld, 305 NY2d 322 ), served to compound the error (cf. People v Colon, 87 AD2d 826 ; People v Pagan, 80 AD2d 924 ).

State v. Brown

64 Wash. App. 606 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Mar 9, 1992

In 1988, Brown moved into Johnson's duplex in Federal Way. Brown later quit his job with Metro, a decision that generated friction between Brown and Johnson. … Ct. 2260 (1980) (quoting Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161 , 169 n.7, 53 L. Ed. 2d 187 , 97 S. Ct. 2221 (1977)).

Brown v. O'Brien

11 Tex. Civ. App. 459 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 7, 1895

In developing their case, plaintiffs offered a deed, executed in Indiana by the guardian of the minors, undertaking to convey to Horace Brown, from whom others of plaintiffs deraign title, the certificate before its location … Is it for the purpose of showing title to this interest in Horace Brown?”

Brown v. State

877 S.W.2d 869 · Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · Jun 8, 1994

Illinois v. Allen, 397 U.S. at 344 , 90 S.Ct. at 1061 ; Mouton v. State, 155 Tex.Crim. 450 , 235 S.W.2d 645 (App.1950). … Illinois v. Allen, 397 U.S. at 344 , 90 S.Ct. at 1061 ; Rainey v. State, 20 Tex.App. 455 . Third, physical restraints are an affront to the court and its proceedings. Illinois v.

Miller v. Brown

216 S.W. 452 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 13, 1919

Brown, appellee, against appellants, K. C. Miller, county judge of Presidio county, R. Barnett, G. A. Chavez, W. T. Davis, and T. C. … Von Rosenberg v. Lovett, 173 S.W. 508 . We conclude that the court was in error in the judgment rendered.

Thompson v. Brown

50 Mo. App. 314 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 30, 1892

Ring v. Jameson, 2 Mo. App. 584 ; s. c., 66 Mo. 428 ; Harrison v. Hall, 8 Mo. App. 167 ; Loeffel v. Hors, 11 Mo. App. 133 ; Raglan v. Steamboat, 40 Mo. 244 ; Vito Viti v. Dixon, 12 Mo. 315 ; Fulton Iron Works v. … Harrison v. Hall, supra; Hall’s Ex’r Case, 48 Pa. St. 24.

People v. Brown

105 A.D.3d 517 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 9, 2013