Case law

Eckart v. Brown

34 Cal. App. 2d 182 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 21, 1939

(Struck & Johnson Co. v. Brown, 113 Cal. App. 691, 693 [ 298 Pac. 1036 ]; Conklin v. Woody, 33 Cal. App. 554, 560 [ 165 Pac. 54 ] ; 20 Cal. Jur., (1925) 253, sec. 7.) … (Smith v. Lingelbach, 177 Wis. 170 [ 187 N. W. 1007, 1008 ]; Goodhue v. State Street Trust Co., 267 Mass. 28 [ 165 N. E. 701, 704 ]; Millard v. Green, 94 Conn. 597 [ 110 Atl. 177, 181 , 9 A. L.

Brown v. Fore

299 S.W. 950 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 5, 1927

Brown, Emmett McFadden, and Virgil Hus *951 bands. … Co. v. Bremond, 66 Tex. 159 , 18 S. W. 448 ; White v. Downs, 40 Tex. 425 ; McCamly v. Waterhouse, 80 Tex. 340 , 16 S. W. 19 .

Brown v. Soupenne

416 So. 2d 170 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · May 11, 1982

Brown fell through weak or rotten boards in the building or through a pre-existing hole in the floor, it is clear to this court that either instance is a "ruin" contemplated by Article 2322. … See Sampay v. Morton Salt Co., 395 So.2d 326 (La.1981). Foster v. Hampton, 381 So.2d 789 (La.1980).

State v. Brown

446 S.W.2d 498 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 16, 1969

Constitution of Missouri, Article V, Section 3; City of Olivette v. Graeler, Mo.App., 329 S.W.2d 275 , transferred to 338 S.W.2d 827 ; City of St. Louis v. Butler Co., 358 Mo. 1221 , 219 S.W.2d 372 . … State v. Akers, Mo.App., 287 S.W.2d 370 . And it is likewise true that paternity is an element. State v. Williams, supra.

Brown v. State

177 P.3d 577 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 23, 2008

Brown argues that this error requires a modification of his sentence. ¶ 15 In Anderson v. … See Head v.

Wittenberg v. Brown

6 Conn. Super. Ct. 326 · Connecticut Superior Court · Jul 8, 1938

Brown v. Yoakum

170 S.W. 803 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 6, 1914

Smith v. Fly, 24 Tex. 345 , 76 Am.Dec. 109; Weir v. McGee, 25 Tex.Supp. 20; Daughtrey v. Knolle, 44 Tex. 451 ; Rich v. Ferguson, 45 Tex. 396 . … O'Connell v. Duke, 29 Tex. 300 , 94 Am.Dec. 282; Moore v. Hazlewood, 67 Tex. 624 , 4 S.W. 215 ; Wheeler v. Boyd, 69 Tex. 293 , 6 S.W. 614 ; Culbertson v. Blanchard, 79 Tex. 486 , 15 S.W. 700 ; Lancaster v.

State v. Brown

60 Conn. App. 487 · Connecticut Appellate Court · Oct 17, 2000

State v. Small, 242 Conn. 93, 115 , 700 A.2d 617 (1997); State v. Dawkins, 42 Conn. App. 810, 821 , 681 A.2d 989 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 932 , 683 A.2d 400 (1996); State v. Lopez, 37 Conn. … State v. Golding, supra, 213 Conn. 239 -40.

Miller v. Brown

216 S.W. 452 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 13, 1919

Brown, appellee, against appellants, K. C. Miller, county judge of Presidio county, R. Barnett, G. A. Chavez, W. T. Davis, and T. C. … Von Rosenberg v. Lovett, 173 S.W. 508 . We conclude that the court was in error in the judgment rendered.

Brown v. State

401 So. 2d 213 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Apr 21, 1981

III The trial court did not err in admitting a photograph of the bullet-riddled body of Clara Brown taken by the state toxicologist prior to embalming and autopsy. … Over appellant's objection the victim's mother identified the person depicted in the photograph as Clara Brown.

Brown v. Commonwealth

3 Va. App. 182 · Court of Appeals of Virginia · Oct 7, 1986

However, in Bunting v. … See Trogdon v. Commonwealth, 72 Va. (31 Gratt.) 862 , 870-71 (1878).

Brown v. State

813 So. 2d 202 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 3, 2002

813 So.2d 202 (2002) Tamika BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 2D01-285. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. April 3, 2002. *203 James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Robert D. … Smith v. State, 788 So.2d 1131, 1132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). As to the alleged violation of condition twelve, the State produced no evidence to prove that Brown was not at home for the officer's 2 a.m. visit.

Brown v. State

4 Ala. App. 122 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 9, 1912

Assuming the sufficiency of the indictment in this case because it is in the form prescribed by the Code for an indictment for vagrancy (Code, § 7161, Form 112; Coleman v.

State v. Brown

601 S.W.2d 311 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 6, 1980

In State v. … State v. Sturdivan, 497 S.W.2d 139,144 (Mo. 1973).

People v. Brown

375 Ill. App. 3d 1116 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 24, 2007

PRESIDING JUSTICE STEIGMANN delivered the opinion of the court: Following a June 2006 bench trial, the trial court convicted defendant, Cletus Craig Brown, of unlawful possession of a methamphetamine precursor (pseudoephedrine … Prior to our supreme court’s decision in People v.

Miller v. Brown

136 Cal. App. 2d 763 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 8, 1955

(Heple v. Kluge, 114 Cal.App.2d 473 [ 250 P.2d 694 ]; Nuttman v. Chais, 101 Cal.App.2d 476 [ 225 P.2d 660 ]; D. L. Godbey & Sons Const. Co. v. Deane, 39 Cal.2d 429 [ 246 P.2d 946 ].) … The trial court believed Brown. This was, of course, a fact question for the trial court. (Luitweiler etc. Co. v. Ukiah etc. Co., 16 Cal.App. 198 [ 116 P. 707, 712 ]; Fiddyment v.

Board of County Commissioners v. Brown Bros.

6 Colo. App. 43 · Colorado Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1895

Judgment was given against the appellant' as garnishee for the amount of appellees’ claim, and the board appealed. … Stermer v. Board of Commissioners of La Plata County, 5 Colo. App. 379 . The judgment will be reversed and remanded, with directions to the court below to dismiss the garnishment proceeding., , ■ . - Reversed.

Brown v. State

44 Md. App. 71 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Nov 7, 1979

Ward v. State, 284 Md. 189 , 396 A.2d 1041 (1978); Williamson v. State, supra; Smith v. State, supra. … In Gladden v.

Com. v. Dunmyer-Brown

193 A.3d 1106 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 2018

People v. Brown

51 A.D.3d 685 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 6, 2008

doubt (see People v Nieves, 37 AD3d 277 [2007]; People v Trotter, 24 AD3d 127 [2005]; cf. … People v Quinn, 186 AD2d 691, 692 [1992]).