Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSA

10,000+ results

3.38s

  • Gibbons v. Brown

    716 So. 2d 868 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 9, 1998

    Glass v. … Corp. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    198 Ga. App. 239 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Dec 5, 1990

    The background of this case appears in Brown v. State, 191 Ga. App. 779 ( 383 SE2d 170 ) (1989), wherein this court reversed the denial of a motion to suppress cocaine found in defendant’s pants pocket. … Brown v. State, supra. The agent suspected that he might try to hide drugs away from his person and cautioned another agent to go back into the room where defendant was sitting and not to leave defendant alone.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    633 S.W.2d 301 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 27, 1982

    Brown v. State, 574 S.W.2d 501, 502 (Mo.App.1978). … Our Supreme Court has carved out a narrow exception to this rule in Flowers v. State, 618 S.W.2d 655 (Mo.1981).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Brown

    75 Mass. App. Ct. 361 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Oct 8, 2009

    Compare Commonwealth v. Sperrazza, 372 Mass. 667, 670 (1977); Commonwealth v. Sylvester, 35 Mass. App. … Vuthy Seng v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    82 Ark. App. 61 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 30, 2003

    Gordon v. State, 326 Ark. 90 , 931 S.W.2d 91 (1996); Gibson v. State, supra. … Gordon v. State, supra; Gibson v. State, supra. Pickett v. State, 55 Ark. App. at 264 , 935 S.W.2d at 282 (1996).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    172 A.D.2d 844 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 29, 1991

    Weaver, 162 AD2d 486 ; People v Planes, 158 AD2d 481 ; People v McLennon, 156 AD2d 478 ; People v Bowden, 156 AD2d 372 ). … Santos, 154 AD2d 284, 285 ; see, People v Carter, 162 AD2d 218 ).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Mueller v. Brown

    221 Cal. App. 2d 319 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 17, 1963

    (See also Thompson v. Board of Trustees, 144 Cal. 281, 283 [ 77 P. 951 ]; Briare v. Matthews, 202 Cal. 1, 6 [ 258 P. 939 ].) … Brown (R.M.), J., concurred. Conley, P. J., deeming himself disqualified, did not participate.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Earnhardt

    297 S.C. 7 · Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Nov 14, 1988

    Goolsby, Judge: Sandra Brown Earnhardt, the mother of Holly Brown, a four-year old child, appeals the order of the family court that awards visitation rights to the respondents Walter C. Brown and Betty T. … See Mathis v. Johnson, 258 S. C. 321, 188 S.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    42 N.C. App. 724 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 4, 1979

    Calvert v. Carstarphen, 133 N.C., 25 , 45 S.E., 353 . They may not be disregarded or set at naught (1) by act of the Legislature (Cooper v. … Womble v. Gin Co., 194 N.C., 577 , 140 S.E., 230 . See Porter v. R. R., 106 N.C., 478 , 11 S.E., 515 , for summary of the decisions. . . .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    4 Or. App. 219 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 2, 1970

    State v. Charles, 3 Or App 172 , 469 P2d 792 (1970). … See also, State v. Charles, 90 Adv Sh 1413, 1416, 3 Or App 172 , 469 P2d 792 (1970).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    400 N.W.2d 74 · Court of Appeals of Iowa · Nov 26, 1986

    Calvert v. State, 310 N.W.2d 185, 186-87 (Iowa 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 930 , 102 S.Ct. 1980 , 72 L.Ed.2d 447 (1982). We believe the present case is similar to the situation presented in State v. … State v. Washington, 356 N.W.2d 192, 196 (Iowa 1984).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    27 Ill. App. 3d 891 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 18, 1975

    The individual defendant (Brown) was ordered to jail for 60-days or until such time as he complied with the court order; the corporate defendant was. fined $2500. Brown was released on bail pending appeal. … People v. Brown, 72 misc. 2d 526, 339 N.Y.S. 2d 470, 473 (1972). In the instant case, there is no claim that the films ordered produced were the private property of the individual defendant.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    8 Rob. 566 · Louisiana Court of Errors and Appeals · Jul 15, 1844

    Tide The People v. Goodwin, Wheeler’s Criminal Cases. United States v. Pedro Gibert and others, 2 Sumner’s R. 19. What then is the test by which we must ascertain and determine whether a person has been once tried? … In the case of The People v. Olcott, 2 Johns.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Wilson

    Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · May 5, 2016

    Brown, Respondent, against Carlton Wilson, Defendant. CARLTON WILSON, Purported Nonparty-Appellant. … Capelin Assoc. v Globe Mfg. Corp. , 34 NY2d 338, 341 [1974]; see also 6234 Jericho Realty Corp. v Autozone, Inc. , 27 AD3d 447 , 449 [2006]; Petri v Half Off Cards , 284 AD2d 444, 445 [2001]).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    235 Ill. App. 3d 479 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 22, 1992

    If these allegations were true, this case would be factually almost identical to People v. Brown (1989), 182 Ill. … (People v. Brown (1991), 214 Ill.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Crockett

    601 S.W.2d 188 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 4, 1980

    Brown had a son, Steven Mark Brown, who is now asserting . that he is the biological child of Jerome T. Ragsdale, Deceased, and Madeleine F. Brown. … See: Estate of Maxey v. Sparks, 559 S.W.2d 458 (Tex. Civ.App. — Texarkana 1977, writ ref’d n. r. e.).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Bedell

    234 A.D. 90 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 18, 1931

    Justice Sears, writing for the court, said: “ Although we have repeatedly given a liberal construction to the provisions of the Civil Practice Act relating to an examination of an adverse party (Brown v. Brown, 203 App. … (Brown v. Brown, supra; Shaw v. Samley Realty Co., Inc., 201 App. Div. 433 ; Samols v. Mayer, 120 Misc. Rep. 516 .)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Whinery v. Brown

    36 Ind. App. 276 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Oct 12, 1905

    Chester Brown testified that he was present when the agreement as to the charges was made, and that the agreement was as testified to by the above witness. ■ It is well settled that an action can not be maintained against … Champertous agreements can not be enforced in this State, but the rule declared in Scobey v. Ross (1859), 13 Ind. 117 , has been restricted and modified. See Quigley v. Thompson, supra; Board, etc., v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Hooks v. Brown

    348 S.W.2d 104 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 14, 1961

    See Wells v. Houston, 29 Tex.Civ.App. 619 , 69 S.W. 183 , San Antonio Civil Appeals, writ ref. The Court’s definition of “duress” was substantially correct. See Hailey v. … Stribling v. Stribling, 85 S.W.2d 315 , Austin Civil Appeals, writ dism., Browning v. Nesting, 219 S.W.2d 712 , San Antonio Civil Appeals, writ ref., N.R.E.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Feurt v. Brown

    23 Mo. App. 332 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 22, 1886

    Ihmsen v. Kegley, 25 Pa. St. 297. … McKnight v. McCutchen, 27 Mo. 436 ; Scott v. Caruth, 50 Mo. 120 ; Russell v. Grimes, 46 Mo. 410 ; Buckner v. Reis, 34 Mo. 357 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.