Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSA

10,000+ results

2.75s

  • Gaines v. Brown

    177 S.W. 220 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 8, 1915

    Brown. … W. 789 ; Chandler v. Meckling, 22 Tex. 36 ; Bailey v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Merz

    429 So. 2d 463 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 4, 1983

    429 So.2d 463 (1983) Tom Ray BROWN and Gwendolyn Jackson v. Beth MERZ and Cheryl Merz and Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. Beth MERZ and Cheryl Merz v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS. Nos. 13177, 13178. … The cases were consolidated, and following trial on the merits, the court rendered the following judgments: 1) Brown & Jackson v. Beth and Cheryl Merz, Cumis Insurance Co.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Town of Woodway v. Snohomish County

    172 Wash. App. 643 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Jan 7, 2013

    TracFone Wireless, Inc. v. Dep’t of Revenue, 170 Wn.2d 273, 281 , 242 P.3d 810 (2010). As we noted in Davidson Series & Assocs. v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board, 159 Wn. … Woodway and SRB cite Noel v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    39 Md. App. 497 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jun 8, 1978

    v. … Dorsey v. State, supra, 276 Md. [638,] at 659 ..., Facyson v. State, 35 Md.

    Reversed on other grounds by Brown v. State, 285 Md. 469 (1979)Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    2013 Ohio 4981 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 2013

    [Cite as State v. Brown, 2013-Ohio-4981.] … Eastley v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. Brown

    139 Ky. 397 · Court of Appeals of Kentucky · Oct 17, 1900

    Brown, was thereupon appointed by the Governor to fill the *398 vacancy. The (Governor also issued a proclamation ordering an election to be beld at tbe following November election to fill tbe unexpired term. … The agreed case between him and Judge Brown to determine the validity of his election was decided in the Pa3mtte circuit court within seven days before the election, and an appeal was immediately taken to this court and was

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Felkel

    320 S.C. 292 · Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Oct 30, 1995

    Save Charleston Foundation v. Murray, 286 S.C. 170 , 333 S.E. (2d) 60 (Ct. App. 1985). … Brown contends DFA and Felkel must prove the parties in the two actions were the same or their privies to successfully assert the defense of res judicata. See Owenby v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Dow v. Brown

    193 So. 239 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 3, 1939

    We thoroughly considered this identical question in Carkuff v. … The same principle is discussed in Meredith v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    187 A.D.2d 312 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 10, 1992

    (Penal Law § 35.15 [2] [a]), and the number of shots fired into the victim (see, People v Major, 116 AD2d 594 ). … Finally, we find no basis to disturb the sentencing court’s exercise of discretion (People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302 ). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Ross and Asch, JJ.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    86 So. 3d 1225 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 2, 2012

    Anthony v. State, 854 So.2d 744, 747 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). In reviewing a revocation of probation, the appropriate standard is abuse of discretion. Id. … State v. Carter, 835 So.2d 259, 262 (Fla.2002).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    109 A.D.3d 1216 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 27, 2013

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    113 A.D.3d 455 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 14, 2014

    There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations, including its evaluation of the purported inconsistencies in testimony that defendant asserts on appeal (see People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759 , 761 [1977

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Prestia v. Brown

    191 A.D.2d 224 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 9, 1993

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Lashway v. Brown

    278 A.D.2d 639 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 14, 2000

    Costello, 270 AD2d 673, 674 ; Matter of Faison v Senkowski, 256 AD2d 702 , appeal dismissed 93 NY2d 870 ). … Goord, 254 AD2d 558 , lv denied 92 NY2d 819 ; Matter of Greene v Coombe, 238 AD2d 813 , lv denied 91 NY2d 801 ).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. O'Connor

    193 A.D.2d 1088 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 28, 1993

    As a general rule, liability for the condition of real property ceases when control and possession of the property is transferred (Young v Hanson, 179 AD2d 978, 978-979 ; Romel v Reale, 155 AD2d 747, 748 ; Farragher v City … When, however, the new owner of the property has not had a reasonable time to cure an alleged defect on the property, liability remains with the former owner (Farragher v City of New York, supra, at 496; see also, Young v

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    352 N.J. Super. 338 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 27, 2002

    Super. 338 STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Taihisha BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued March 1, 2002. … State v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Wathen v. Brown

    200 Pa. Super. 620 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 1963

    Muchow v. Schaffner, 180 Pa. Superior Ct. 413 , 119 A. 2d 568 . … Keefer v. Sunbury School District, 203 Pa. 334 , 52 A. 245 ; George McKay and Jerome H. Louchheim, Co-partners v. Michael O’Rourke, 194 Pa. 471 , 45 A. 327 .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    79 Cal. App. 3d 649 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 10, 1978

    Defendant Brown contends before us that the testimony elicited from Sergeant Fritz constitutes inadmissible hearsay and a violation of People v. … In place of the prejudicial-per-se error (Bruton v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    252 A.D.2d 592 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 27, 1998

    The delay in sentencing the defendant was excusable because it was the result of his own conduct in providing law enforcement officials with aliases and other false information (see, People v Drake, 61 NY2d 359, 366 ). … Under the circumstances of this case, the sentence imposed on the defendant was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 ). Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Joy, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Talkington v. Brown

    2014 Ohio 779 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 26, 2014

    [Cite as Talkington v. Brown, 2014-Ohio-779.] … Mary DeGenaro Dated: February 26, 2014 [Cite as Talkington v. Brown, 2014-Ohio-779.]

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.