Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSA

10,000+ results

2.31s

  • Brown v. State

    184 So. 2d 527 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 15, 1966

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Brown v. Williams

    169 So. 2d 534 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 2, 1964

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Brown v. State

    170 So. 2d 616 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 6, 1965

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Brown v. State

    178 So. 2d 923 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 4, 1965

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Brown v. State

    164 So. 2d 581 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 14, 1964

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Brown v. Heald

    129 So. 2d 710 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 7, 1961

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • People v. Brown

    116 A.D.3d 597 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 22, 2014

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bernitt v. Brown

    16 Ill. App. 3d 774 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 21, 1973

    See, for example, Deckard v. … However, defendant’s suggestions in reply to plaintiffs motion for summary reversal have invited our attention to the more recent decision of Fultz v. Haugan, 49 Ill.2d 131, 134-135 , 273 N.E.2d 403 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Connor v. Brown

    226 S.W.2d 229 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 15, 1949

    In the case of Davis et al. v. … To the same effect are Browne v. Gorman, 208 S.W. 385 , by this court, writ refused; Gorham v. Settegast, 44 Tex.Civ.App. 254 , 98 S.W. 665 ; Watts v. Howard, 77 Tex. 71, 13 S.W. 966 ; Coffee et al. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Bird v. Brown

    148 Pa. Super. 534 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 2, 1942

    The board was of the opinion that claimant sustained an accident which aggravated a pre-existing hernia. … The board made no separate findings of fact but affirmed the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and award of the referee.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Simmons

    270 S.W.3d 508 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 2008

    George Brown, Jr. (“Appellant”) appeals the judgment of the Pemiscot County Circuit Court dismissing his petition for asserting a claim precluded under the doctrine of res judicata. … Thompson Trucking, Inc. v. Dorsey Trailers, Inc., 880 F.2d 818, 819-20 (5th Cir.1989); Shoup v. Bell & Howell Co., 872 F.2d 1178, 1179 (4th Cir.1989); Fansher v. Kassel, 782 F.Supp. 1334, 1336 (E.D.Mo.1992).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Goord

    1 A.D.2d 684 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 6, 2003

    Goord, 297 AD2d 869 [2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 503 [2002]; Matter of Sanders v Goord, 275 AD2d 842, 843 [2000]). … His exculpatory testimony presented an issue of credibility for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Knight v Selsky, 297 AD2d 845 [2002]).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    182 Md. App. 138 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Oct 2, 2008

    State, 165 Md.App. 60, 70-72 , 884 A.2d 758 (2005), aff'd, 393 Md. 593 , 903 A.2d 922 (2006); Gerald v. State, 137 Md.App. 295, 308-11 , 768 A.2d 140 , cert. denied, 364 Md. 462 , 773 A.2d 514 (2001); Brown v. … In Bell v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Crookston v. Brown

    140 A.D.2d 868 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 19, 1988

    We find no error in the fact that respondent disagreed with the Hearing Officer’s recommended penalty (see, Matter of Sanchez v Board of Examiners of Nursing Home Adm’rs, 93 AD2d 916 ). … The court held that "[sjexual harassment in the work place is among the most offensive and demeaning torments an employee can undergo” (supra, at 961; see also, Matter of Brais v Board of Educ., 92 AD2d 706 ).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Cooper v. Brown

    10 Ga. App. 730 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Mar 6, 1912

    In Roberts v. … The Governor v. Kemp, 12 Ga. 466 .” In Smith v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    578 P.2d 364 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 19, 1978

    While the Supreme Court in Burgett v. … In State v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    6 Okla. Crim. 442 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 1911

    Brown, and applies to the court for a change of judge in said action, and states as his ground therefor that the presiding judge of said *443 county court is prejudiced and biased against said defendant, and that said defendant … Eubanks v. Cole, District Judge, 4 Okla. Cr. 25, 109 Pac. 736 , it is said: “A mandamus to an inferior court is in the nature of appellate jurisdiction.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    294 So. 2d 128 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 15, 1974

    294 So.2d 128 (1974) Theodore BROWN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 73-793. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. January 29, 1974. On Rehearing May 15, 1974. Phillip A. … A fingerprint technician with the Public Safety Department was able to identify the latent print with the number 2 finger of the defendant, Theodore Brown.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    61 Cal. App. 574 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 6, 1923

    (People v. Eppinger, 105 Cal. 36 [ 38 Pac. 538 ].)

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    121 Ill. App. 3d 776 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 7, 1984

    PRESIDING JUSTICE SEIDENFELD delivered the opinion of the court: Following a jury trial in absentia the defendant, Layconia Brown, was convicted of the offense of residential burglary (Ill. Rev. … (See Andrews v. Foxworthy (1978), 71 Ill. 2d 13, 21 .)

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.