Case law

People v. Brown

88 Cal. App. 3d 283 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 15, 1979

(Skelton v. Superior Court (1969) 1 Cal.3d 144, 150 [ 81 Cal.Rptr. 613 , 460 P.2d 485 ]; People v. Superior Court (Brown) (1975) 49 Cal.App.3d 160, 165 [ 122 Cal.Rptr. 459 ].) … (People v. Superior Court (Johnson) (1972) 6 Cal.3d 704, 711 [ 100 Cal.Rptr. 319 , 493 P.2d 1183 ]; People v. Superior Court (Brown), supra, 49 Cal.App.3d at p. 165 .) The judgment is affirmed. Puglia, P.

Brown v. State

167 Ga. App. 851 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Sep 9, 1983

Subsequently the defendant Brown came into Webb’s store and, according to Webb, the following conversation ensued: Brown began by asking: “ ‘I want to know why you put your finger on my buddy,’ and I said, ‘What do you mean … The defendant Brown’s statement was more in the nature of an incriminating statement or admission.

Strickland v. Brown

19 Ga. App. 73 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Dec 11, 1916

Boynton v. Ball, 121 U. S. 457 (7 Sup. Ct. 981, 30 L. ed. 985, 3 R. C. L. 318, 319); Cavanaugh v. Fenley, 94 Minn. 505 ( 103 N. W. 711 , 110 Am. St. R. 382 ); Gregory v. Cale, 115 Minn. 508 ( 133 N. W. 75 , 37 L. R. A.

Brown v. Mock

987 So. 2d 892 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jul 16, 2008

987 So.2d 892 (2008) Randy Victor BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Melanie Lowery MOCK, Defendant-Appellant. No. 43,571-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. … Brown v. Brown, XXXX-XXXX (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/1/06), 925 So.2d 662 ; R.J. v. M.J., supra . These patently unauthorized proceedings cannot suspend the delays for appealing.

Brown v. Leath

17 Tex. Civ. App. 262 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 17, 1897

Willis v. Moore, 59 Tex. 629 ; Trust Co. v. Gill, 8 Texas Civ. App. 358[ 8 Tex. Civ. App. 358 ]; Lombardi v. Shero, 37 S.W. Rep., 613 . The fact that the tenant had notice of the mortgage by its record is immaterial. … On motion for a rehearing, however, upon the authority of the case of Willis v.

Brown v. Commonwealth

33 Va. App. 296 · Court of Appeals of Virginia · Aug 29, 2000

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Elder, Annunziata and Frank Argued at Alexandria, Virginia LOUIS BROWN, JR. OPINION BY v. … Gosling v. Commonwealth, 7 Va.

State v. Brown

393 So. 2d 1195 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 17, 1981

State v. King, 372 So.2d 1126 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 385 So.2d 758 (Fla.1980). Reversed and remanded.

Monson v. Brown

163 Ga. App. 42 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Jun 18, 1982

Pursuant to the decision in Powell v. … See in this regard Atlanta Transit System v. Smith, 141 Ga. App. 87 (1) ( 232 SE2d 580 ); Jordan v. Hagewood, 133 Ga. App. 958, 959 (2) ( 213 SE2d 85 ); Lester v. S. J. Alexander, Inc., 127 Ga.

Brown v. State

866 S.W.2d 675 · Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · Nov 4, 1993

Ineffective assistance of counsel In Hernandez v. … Hathorn v. State, 848 S.W.2d 101, 118 (Tex.Crim.App.1992); see also Jordan v. State, 859 S.W.2d 418, 422 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1993, no pet.). In United States v.

Brown v. Jackson

221 Ga. App. 200 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Apr 29, 1996

Representatives of the estate of Etheridge Brown filed this *201 wrongful death suit against Deputy Sheriffs Cordel Jackson and Richard Vi rung and Peach County. The three defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. … In Gilbert v.

Brown v. State

753 P.2d 908 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 23, 1988

Brown had to shoot herself seven times or the appellant had to shoot her seven times, the appellant responded that “it appears that way.” … See United States v. George, 778 F.2d 556, 561 (10th Cir.1985).

Houston v. Brown

212 Ga. App. 834 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Mar 9, 1994

Appellee mother Tina Brown continued to live in Columbia County, while appellant Houston moved his residence at least twice. … Banning v. Banning, 245 Ga. 19 (262 SE2d. 788); Hopkins v. Hopkins, 237 Ga. 845, 847 ( 229 SE2d 751 ). In the peculiar and limited circumstances of this case, as in Daust v. Daust, 204 Ga.

State v. Brown

263 Or. App. 263 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 29, 2014

State v. … As we hold today in State v.

Ciufo v. Brown

148 So. 2d 459 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jan 7, 1963

See Turner v. Brown, La.App., 134 So.2d 384, 386 ; Batiste v. Brown, La.App., 134 So.2d 381, 382 ; Sewell v. Sharp, La.App., 102 So.2d 259, 261 . … The applicable standard of evaluation pertinent to the instant case is to be found in Turner v.

Brown v. State

253 Ga. App. 741 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Feb 14, 2002

Overand v. State, 240 Ga. App. 682, 683 (1) ( 523 SE2d 610 ) (1999). See also McDaniel v. State, 227 Ga. … The evidence presented in this case supports the trial court’s determination that the officer had the requisite articulable suspicion to stop Brown’s truck. State v. Wright, 221 Ga. App. at 205 (3).

Brown v. State

880 S.W.2d 249 · Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · Jul 7, 1994

Dorado v. State, 860 S.W.2d 558, 559-60 (Tex.App. … When the court made this ruling, Brown’s attorney did not object, thus waiving any error on this issue. Tex.R.App.P. 52(a); Cisneros v. State, 692 S.W.2d 78, 82 (Tex.Crim.App.1985); Brooks v.

Brown v. State

729 S.W.2d 54 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 30, 1987

Brown voluntarily dismissed his direct appeal. … The proof Brown proposed to offer would not have established the “purposeful discrimination” required by Swain v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 202 , 85 S.Ct. 824 , 13 L.Ed.2d 759 (1965).

State v. Brown

7 N.M. 65 · New Mexico Court of Appeals · Nov 6, 2014

State v. … II, § 13; see also Browning-Ferris Indus. of Vt., Inc. v.

Brown v. Donahoo

141 Ga. App. 309 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Feb 17, 1977

Scott Properties, Inc. v. Lawson, 124 Ga. App. 158 ( 183 SE2d 238 ). … In this case the Browns sought damages as plaintiffs against Donahoo as defendant. The Browns failed in their recovery. Therefore they are bound to pay the costs. Markham v. Ross, 73 Ga. 105; King v. Cox, 130 Ga.

People v. Brown

4 A.D.3d 790 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 11, 2004

Under the circumstances of this case, the testimony of Blake—the victim named in the indictment—cannot be said to have been “trivial or cumulative” (People v Rodriguez, 38 NY2d 95, 101 [1975]; see People v Brown, 34 NY2d … 658, 659-660 [1974]; see also People v Smith, 225 AD2d 1030, 1031 [1996]; People v Ronchi, 154 AD2d 891, 892 [1989]).