Case law

Abruzzino v. Brown

2025 Ohio 438 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 6, 2025

[Cite as Abruzzino v. Brown, 2025-Ohio-438.] … Case No. 24 CO 0021 [Cite as Abruzzino v. Brown, 2025-Ohio-438.]

Brown v. Regan

112 A.D.2d 570 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 11, 1985

We disagree (see, Matter of Krolowitz v Regan, 97 AD2d 902, 903 ; Matter of Field v Regan, 90 AD2d 580 , lv denied 58 NY2d 608 ). Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Main, J.

Neatherlin v. Brown

338 Or. App. 354 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 5, 2025

Trujillo v. Maass, 312 Or 431, 435, 822 P2d 703 (1991). … Brown Maxfield v. Cain, 322 Or App 405, 409, 520 P3d 890 (2022) (internal quotation marks omitted).

McCann v. Brown

725 S.W.2d 822 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 26, 1987

In Shell Petroleum Corporation v. … C. of P., PA., 768 F.2d 632, 637 (5th Cir.1985) (quoting Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Airport Board v. Combustion Equipment Associates, Inc., 623 F.2d 1032 (5th Cir.1980)).

People v. Brown

193 A.D.2d 611 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 3, 1993

Childress, 81 NY2d 263, 266 ; People v Bolling, 79 NY2d 317, 324 ; People v Jenkins, 75 NY2d 550, 555-556). … Kentucky, supra, at 96-97; People v Childress, supra, at 266 ).

People v. Brown

220 A.D.2d 250 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 10, 1995

voir dire and opening and final instructions, inter alia, to be "ministers of truth” and that their verdict should "speak the truth”, is unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law for failure to object (People v … (Supra; People v Rawls, 187 AD2d 353 , Iv denied 81 NY2d 845 ; People v Pena, 196 AD2d 753 , Iv denied 82 NY2d 900 .) Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Kupferman, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Brown v. State

830 N.E.2d 956 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Jul 14, 2005

Winn v. State, 748 N.E.2d 352, 357 (Ind.2001). … Wilburn v. State, 442 N.E.2d 1098, 1099 (Ind.1982).

Burke v. Brown

10 Tex. Civ. App. 298 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 18, 1895

Plaintiffs brought this suit to remove, as a cloud upon their title, a lien asserted by the defendant Brown against their lot of land situated in the city of Galveston, for furnishing tools to move a house onto said lot. … Matthews v. Brewing Association, 83 Texas, 604 .

People v. Brown

2025 NY Slip Op 01228 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 5, 2025

People v Brown ( 2025 NY Slip Op 01228 ) People v Brown 2025 NY Slip Op 01228 Decided on March 5, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431 … No. 72709/21) [*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent, v Robert Brown, appellant. Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Chelsea Lopez of counsel; Taewoo Kim on the memorandum), for appellant.

Ward v. Brown

919 So. 2d 462 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jun 17, 2005

Perry Co. v. … P’ship v.

Brown v. Blake

86 Ark. App. 107 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 28, 2004

Brown indicating that Brown did not realize who actually owned the property. … See Firstbank of Ark. v.

Stanton v. Brown

269 S.W.2d 853 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 17, 1954

Appellant insists, however, that Ogg v. Ogg was decided upon another point of law, so that the, language relied upon by appellee is mere dictum. Appellant further insists that the dictum of Ogg v. … In Zummo Packing Co. v.

Dodson v. Brown

70 Pa. Super. 359 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 10, 1918

See Pile et al. v. Pedrick et al., 167 Pa. 296 ; Baugh v. Bergdoll, 227 Pa. 120 ; Wagner v. King, 41 Pa. Superior Ct. 292 .

Brown v. Comegys

500 A.2d 611 · Superior Court of Delaware · Oct 3, 1985

Valley Forge relies on Nelson v. … DiStefano v. Lamborn, Del.Super, 81 A.2d 675 (1951); Baltimore Trust Co. v.

Brown v. Rougon

552 So. 2d 1052 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 15, 1989

552 So.2d 1052 (1989) Edgar Lawrence BROWN and Donald Gregory Brown v. Floerl C. ROUGON, Rosemary Rummler, Jens Rummler and Sheriff Preston Chustz. No. CA 88 1359. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. … In O'Connor v.

Storm v. Brown

15 Ill. App. 3d 29 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 26, 1973

(Siebens v. Konicek, 108 Ill.App.2d 300 , 247 N.E.2d 53 (1969); McInturff v. Chicago Title & Trust Co., 102 Ill.App.2d 39 , 243 N.E.2d 657 (1968)). … See also French v. City of Springfield, 5 Ill.App.3d 368 , 283 N.E.2d 18 (1972); Downs v. Camp, 113 Ill.App.2d 221 , 252 N.E.2d 46 (1969).

Brown v. . Craig

2 N.C. 378 · Superior Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1796

On the part of the defendants it was proven that they delivered to Brown some bonds and accounts due to them, the defendants, from persons (379) resident in South Carolina, where Brown lived; and he gave them a writing purporting … This is proved by Chamberlyn v. Delarive , cited at the bar from 2 Wils., 353.

People v. Brown

88 Cal. App. 3d 283 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 15, 1979

(Skelton v. Superior Court (1969) 1 Cal.3d 144, 150 [ 81 Cal.Rptr. 613 , 460 P.2d 485 ]; People v. Superior Court (Brown) (1975) 49 Cal.App.3d 160, 165 [ 122 Cal.Rptr. 459 ].) … (People v. Superior Court (Johnson) (1972) 6 Cal.3d 704, 711 [ 100 Cal.Rptr. 319 , 493 P.2d 1183 ]; People v. Superior Court (Brown), supra, 49 Cal.App.3d at p. 165 .) The judgment is affirmed. Puglia, P.

Brown v. State

167 Ga. App. 851 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Sep 9, 1983

Subsequently the defendant Brown came into Webb’s store and, according to Webb, the following conversation ensued: Brown began by asking: “ ‘I want to know why you put your finger on my buddy,’ and I said, ‘What do you mean … The defendant Brown’s statement was more in the nature of an incriminating statement or admission.

State v. Brown

691 So. 2d 637 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 18, 1997

691 So.2d 637 (1997) STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Joshua Ray BROWN, James Green and Clay Novick, Appellee. No. 96-999. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. April 18, 1997. Robert A. … The court, in suppressing the evidence, stated: Basically [ McNeil v.