Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.97s
3 Ill. App. 3d 879 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 9, 1972
Brown, testified in his own behalf. … (See, e.g., People v. Coolidge, 124 Ill.App.2d 479 , 259 N.E.2d 851 ; People v. Casa, 113 Ill.App.2d 1 , 251 N.E.2d 290 and People v. Buzinski, 64 Ill.App.2d 194 , 212 N.E.2d 270 .)
Cited 18 timesPublished327 Pa. Super. 610 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 19, 1984
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text325 Pa. Super. 612 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 23, 1984
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text313 Pa. Super. 633 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 27, 1983
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text111 Idaho 1027 · Idaho Court of Appeals · Dec 2, 1986
In vacating the plat, the board of county commissioners recited that the Browns were the sole owners of the property within Clam-se-net. … Sutton v. Brown, 91 Idaho 396 , 422 P.2d 63 (1966); Lewiston Lime Co. v. Barney, 87 Idaho 462 , 394 P.2d 323 (1964).
Cited 20 timesPublished110 A.D.3d 481 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 8, 2013
The court properly exercised its discretion when it *483 denied defense counsel’s midtrial applications for yet another competency examination (see Pate v Robinson, 383 US 375 [1966]; People v Tortorici, 92 NY2d 757 [1999 … ], cert denied 528 US 834 [1999]; People v Morgan, 87 NY2d 878 [1995]).
Cited 3 timesPublished289 Wis. 2d 691 · Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · Feb 7, 2006
We first address Brown's argument that the trial court was obligated to give the department's recommendation "due weight deference." Citing Brown v. … In State v.
Cited 5 timesPublished343 S.W.3d 760 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 12, 2011
Deraughn Brown (“Movant”) appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm in part and remand for an evidentiary hearing in light of our Supreme Court’s holding in Webb v. … State v. Prince, 311 S.W.3d 327, 334-35 (Mo.App. W.D.2010). Point denied. In Movant’s second point on appeal, he argues that the motion court erred in denying his motion because counsel was ineffective.
Cited 6 timesPublished304 Pa. Super. 611 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1982
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text300 S.W.2d 364 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 14, 1957
Harrison v. Boring, 44 Tex. 255, 261 ; Gulf Sulpher Co. v. Ryman, Tex.Civ.App., 221 S.W. 310 . … See also Bretzke v. Gode, Tex.Civ.App., 289 S.W. 111 ; Williams v. Kuykendall, Tex.Civ.App., 151 S.W. 629 ; Maride v. Hines, Tex.Civ.App., 247 S.W.2d 611 ; Boles v.
Cited 6 timesPublished300 Pa. Super. 623 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 28, 1982
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text228 Pa. Super. 158 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 21, 1974
Brown, in fact, selling red capsules which he . . . stated were, in fact, narcotics.” This information was not merely a conclusion that the defendant possessed narcotics, see Aguilar v. … In Commonwealth v. Smith, 225 Pa.
Cited 12 timesPublished577 So. 2d 784 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 3, 1991
577 So.2d 784 (1991) STATE of Louisiana, Appellee, v. Kenneth R. BROWN and Indiana Lumberman's Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant. Nos. 22207-CA, 22208-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. April 3, 1991. … State v. Hathaway, 403 So.2d 737 (La.1981); State v. De La Rose, 391 So.2d 842 (La.1980).
Cited 7 timesPublished197 Ga. App. 155 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Oct 3, 1990
Dallas Leo Brown appeals his sentence and conviction of two counts of robbery. His sole enumeration is the trial court erred in admitting into evidence appellant’s prior armed robbery conviction. … See Brown v. State, 250 Ga. 66, 73 (5) ( 295 SE2d 727 ).
Cited 12 timesPublished292 Pa. Super. 515 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 6, 1981
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text197 Ill. App. 3d 907 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 25, 1990
When she identified herself as Deidre Brown, he arrested her, placed her in the squad car and drove to the corner of 79th and Ada. … (People v. Skiles, 115 Ill. App. 3d at 826 .) In People v.
Cited 21 timesPublished843 S.W.2d 709 · Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · Dec 1, 1992
Tex.R.App.P. 81(b)(2); Brown, 800 S.W.2d at 571 ; see Harris v. State, 790 S.W.2d 568, 587-88 (Tex.Crim.App.1989). … See Brown, 828 S.W.2d at 764 .
Cited 17 timesPublished268 Pa. Super. 594 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 11, 1979
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text137 A.D.2d 595 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 8, 1988
Based on the two positive test results, the petitioner was charged with possession of contraband in violation of rule 113.12, incorporated in 7 NYCRR 270.1 (b) (14) (v). … The Court of Appeals in Matter of Lahey v Kelly ( 71 NY2d 135 ) recently decided that double EMIT test results are sufficiently reliable to constitute substantial evidence in prison disciplinary proceedings.
Cited 3 timesPublished172 Cal. App. 2d 30 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 14, 1959
(People v. O’Donnell, 37 Cal.App. 192, 197 [ 174 P. 102 ].) Probation is not a matter of right, but is an act of grace and clemency. . (People v. Hainline, 219 Cal. 532, 533 [ 28 P.2d 16 ].) In People v. … (People v. Leach, 22 Cal.App.2d 525, 527-528 [ 71 P.2d 594 ].)
Cited 7 timesPublished
Ask Donna