Case law

In re the Marriage of Mau

Court of Appeals of Iowa · Apr 28, 2021

See Brown, 776 N.W.2d at 648. … (quoting Prochelo v. Prochelo, 346 N.W.2d 527, 529 (Iowa 1984))). The QDRO implemented that language.

Brown v. Hudson

700 So. 2d 932 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Sep 19, 1997

Brown cites Bloxom v. Bloxom, 512 So.2d 839 (La.1987), and Dunne v. … Brown relies on Pierce v.

People v. Brown

183 A.D.2d 569 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 19, 1992

People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 424 ). … cf., People v Kitching, supra).

People v. Brown

112 A.D.2d 945 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 5, 1985

In explaining the words "specific cause”, the court noted that such cause must be based upon specific and articulable facts, and that a "[m]ere 'hunch’ or 'gut reaction’ will not do” (People v Sobotker, supra, at p 564 ; … see also, People v Carrasquillo, 54 NY2d 248 ).

People v. Brown

37 Cal. App. 101 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 29, 1918

The point now before us seems to be within the rule announced in People v. Griesheimer, 176 Cal. 44 , [ 167 Pac. 531 ]. … This language of the information brings the case within the terms of the opinion in People v. Griesheimer, from which quotation is above made.

State v. Brown

97 S.W.3d 97 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 10, 2002

State v. Williams, 9 S.W.3d 3, 12 (Mo.App. W.D.1999). … State v. Kidd, 75 S.W.3d 804, 811-12 (Mo.App. W.D.2002) (quoting State v. Hornbuckle, 769 S.W.2d 89, 93 (Mo. banc 1989)). Mr.

Brown v. McNeal

586 S.W.2d 359 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 26, 1979

Appellant’s contention that he was improperly denied discovery of the department’s internal investigation file has been ruled adversely to appellant in Cox v. McNeal, 577 S.W.2d 881 (Mo.App.1979); Miller v. … Appellant also premises error upon the failure of the board to declare a mistrial following certain remarks by the President of the Board during the testimony of a *362 witness.

Stewart v. Brown.

343 Ga. App. 190 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Oct 17, 2017

STEWART v. BROWN. MCFADDEN, Presiding Judge. This appeal challenges the grant of summary judgment to the defendant in a slip-and-fall case. … In Robinson v.

James v. Brown

629 S.W.2d 781 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 21, 1981

Brown (now deceased and for whom his daughter, and heir at law, Elizabeth B. Heyne was substituted as a party), John L. Hall, and Michael R. Rosen-thal. … Snyder v. Faget, 295 Ala. 197 , 326 So.2d 113, 115 (1976); Bencomo v. Morgan, 210 So.2d 236, 237 (Fla.App.1968); Bailey v. McGill, 247 N.C. 286 , 100 S.E.2d *785 860, 867 (1957); Dunbar v.

Smith v. Brown

32 S.W.2d 388 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 17, 1930

The case of Poe v. Ferguson (Tex. Civ. App.) 168 S. W. 459 , relied on by appellants, is not authority for the contention. … In the case of Springer v. Collins (Tex. Civ. App.) IOS S.

People v. Brown

70 Ill. App. 3d 922 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 29, 1979

(See People v. Jayne (1977), 52 Ill. App. 3d 990 , 368 N.E.2d 422 ; People v. Brown (1977), 47 Ill. App. 3d 920 , 365 N.E.2d 514 .) … Merrill v.

People v. Brown

47 Ill. App. 3d 920 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 19, 1977

Again, in People v. … We conclude the prosecutor’s comment did not deny Brown a fair trial. The third comment is more troublesome. Brown cites People v. Bitakis (1st Dist. 1972), 8 Ill.

State v. Brown

556 So. 2d 790 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 9, 1990

556 So.2d 790 (1990) STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Phillip BROWN, Appellee. No. 89-01707. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. February 9, 1990. Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. … We find this case indistinguishable in principle from State v. Edwards, 547 So.2d 183 (Fla.2d DCA 1989).

People v. Brown

196 A.D.2d 465 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 26, 1993

"The People have a duty to prevent the destruction of evidence until all appeals have been exhausted” (People v Watkins, 189 AD2d 623, 624 , lv denied 81 NY2d 978 ). … The prosecutor’s comments during summation that may have implicated defendant’s right not to testify were responsive to trial counsel’s summation (People v McIntyre, 177 AD2d 255 , lv denied 79 NY2d 950 ), and the jury is

Brown v. Mando

125 A.D. 380 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 10, 1908

(Cohen v. Ratkowsky, 43 App. Div. 196 .) Section 1674 authorizes the court in its discretion to cancel a lis pendens if a plaintiff filing the notice unreasonably neglects to proceed in the action. … To neglect to make service or commence' publication within sixty days after the filing of the notice is one form of unreasonable neglect to proceed with the action (Cohen v.

Commonwealth v. Brown

424 Pa. Super. 333 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 3, 1993

In Crozer-Chester Medical Center v. … Co. v. Building and Const.

Brown v. State

585 So. 2d 350 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 7, 1991

585 So.2d 350 (1991) Clifton Reader BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 90-3326. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. August 7, 1991. Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Paul E. … In Zambuto v.

Brown v. State

56 So. 3d 783 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 1, 2011

56 So.3d 783 (2011) BROWN v. STATE. No. 5D10-3550. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. March 1, 2011. DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION Affirmed.

Commonwealth v. Brown

321 Pa. Super. 560 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 4, 1983

Commonwealth v. Brown

303 Pa. Super. 568 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 6, 1983