Case law

State v. Brown

490 So. 2d 601 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 11, 1986

State v. Nuccio, 454 So.2d 93 (La.1984). Brown's waiver was knowing and express. R. p. 29; State ex rel. Jackson v. Henderson, 260 La. 90 , 255 So.2d 85 (1971). The voluntariness is clear and unequivocal. State v. … State v. Bonanno, 384 So.2d 355 (La.1980); State v. Bosley, 454 So.2d 1245 (La.App. 2d Cir.1984). Accordingly, Brown's conviction and sentence are affirmed. CONVICTION AND SENTENCE AFFIRMED. NOTES [1] Boykin v.

Brown v. Babbitt

801 Utah Adv. Rep. 8 · Court of Appeals of Utah · Dec 3, 2015

See Brown v. Babbitt, 2015 UT App 161, ¶¶ 8–12 & n.1, 353 P.3d 1262. … See Brown v. Babbitt, 2015 UT App 161, ¶ 7, 353 P.3d 1262. 20140918-CA 8 2015 UT App 291  Brown v.

Brown v. Woodard

961 So. 2d 1057 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jul 25, 2007

See Hartley v. Fla. Dep’t of Corr., 954 So.2d 684 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). BROWNING, C.J., DAVIS and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Brown v. Boney

41 N.C. App. 636 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 19, 1979

Gregory v. Lynch, 271 N.C. 198 , 155 S.E. 2d 488 (1967); Matthews v. Lineberry, 35 N.C. App. 527 , 241 S.E. 2d 735 (1978); 1 Strong’s N. C. Index 3d, Appeal and Error, § 46.1 (1976). … Parker v. Edwards, 222 N.C. 75 , 21 S.E. 2d 876 (1942).

State v. Brown

184 Wash. App. 1028 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Nov 10, 2014

People v. Brown

175 Ill. App. 3d 725 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 20, 1988

Brown, was charged with driving under the influence of alcohol (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 95½, par. 11—501(a)(2)) and driving with a blood-alcohol concentration greater than .10 (Ill. Rev. … (Heaney v. Northeast Park District (1935), 360 Ill. 254 .)

People v. Brown

173 A.D.2d 629 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 20, 1991

arresting officer would lead a reasonable person possessing the same expertise as the arresting officer to conclude that it is more probable than not that the suspect has committed or is committing a crime (see, People v … Bigelow, 66 NY2d 417, 423 ; People v Carrasquillo, 54 NY2d 248, 254 ).

Frey v. Brown

254 So. 2d 491 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 12, 1971

Brown Machine Shop. Made defendants were Frederick Brown, plaintiff’s foreman at the H. Brown Machine Shop in Eunice, and Comet. … Both Ball v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation, supra, and Moak v.

Commonwealth v. Brown

329 Pa. Super. 621 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 1984

Brown v. State

609 So. 2d 730 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 4, 1992

609 So.2d 730 (1992) Thad McGillery BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 90-3048. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. December 4, 1992. Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and P. … Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898, 902 (Fla. 1979). see also Simmons v. State, 596 So.2d 1156 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Pyle v. State, 596 So.2d 744 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Ford v.

Brown v. Richards

194 Utah Adv. Rep. 34 · Court of Appeals of Utah · Aug 24, 1992

See State v. … Co. v.

People v. Brown

129 A.D.3d 426 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 4, 2015

People v. Brown

221 A.D.2d 160 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 2, 1995

Defendant argues that the court violated his rights under People v Antommarchi ( 80 NY2d 247 ) by conducting voir dire of three prospective jurors in his absence. … The court is not required to explain all the contentions of the parties or outline all inconsistencies in the evidence (People v Saunders, 64 NY2d 665 ).

Commonwealth v. Brown

311 Pa. Super. 606 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 1983

Brown v. State

435 N.E.2d 582 · Indiana Court of Appeals · May 27, 1982

Campbell v. State, (1975) 262 Ind. 594 , 321 N.E.2d 560 ; Brimhall v. State, (1972) 258 Ind. 153 , 279 N.E.2d 557 ; Barfell v. State, (1979) Ind.App. 399 N.E.2d 377 . … Specifically, although Brown was advised of his right to a trial by jury, he was not advised of his right to a “public and speedy” trial by jury. A similar situation was presented in Mathis v.

Commonwealth v. Brown

299 Pa. Super. 563 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1982

McBroom v. Brown

277 S.W.2d 310 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 24, 1955

Co. v. … See Allmon v. Texas Electric Service Co., Tex.Civ.App., 242 S.W.2d 806 ; Cagle v. McQueen, 5 Cir., 200 F.2d 186 ; Woolam v. Central Power and Light Co., Tex.Civ.App., 211 S.W.2d 792 ; Allbright v.

Moncada v. Brown

202 S.W.3d 794 · Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · Jun 28, 2006

In Cobb v. Tex. Dept. of Crim. … Brown stated that it felt like the trailer would not go on the trailer ball. Brown told Moneada that “there was something wrong, you know, that it is not hitching.”

Commonwealth v. Brown

297 Pa. Super. 626 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 5, 1982

Commonwealth v. Brown

295 Pa. Super. 598 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 11, 1981