Case law

State v. Watson

179 N.C. App. 228 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 5, 2006

V. … State v. Brown, 312 N.C. 237, 244-45 , 321 S.E.2d 856, 861 (1984). The complainant testified that defendant’s penis penetrated her vagina “more than once.”

Brown v. Teicher

188 A.D.2d 256 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 1, 1992

defendant had requested plaintiff not to serve her at her place of business and agree with the IAS Court that, in the circumstances, the three attempts satisfied the due diligence requirement of CPLR 308 (4) (see, Hochhauser v

People v. Brown

116 Cal. App. 3d 820 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 18, 1981

Here, Brown’s reliance is upon the recent case of People v. Yarber (1979) 90 Cal.App.3d 895, 912-917 [ 153 Cal.Rptr. 875 ]. … (People v. Cole (1956) 47 Cal.2d 99, 103 [ 301 P.2d 854 , 56 A.L.R.2d 1435 ].) “In People v.

People v. Brown

261 A.D.2d 890 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 7, 1999

Brown, 261 AD2d 889 [decided herewith]). … Brown, 155 AD2d 608 ; People v Colon, 89 AD2d 552 ; People v Lee, 84 AD2d 699 ).

People v. Brown

9 Ill. App. 3d 730 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 13, 1973

In People v. … In People v.

Hearn v. Brown

876 So. 2d 380 · Court of Appeals of Mississippi · Sep 23, 2003

Bowman v. Rutledge, 369 So.2d 768, 769 (Miss.1979). … Groseclose v. State, 440 So.2d 297, 300 (Miss.1983).

Brown v. State

406 So. 2d 1262 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 9, 1981

BROWN, a/k/a Benjamin William Brown, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 80-1146. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. December 9, 1981. *1263 Richard L. … Dearth v. State, 390 So.2d 108 (Fla.App. 1980). We hold that the condition complained of, which was imposed by the veteran trial judge, fulfills the purposes of probation conditions as set forth in Dearth, supra .

State v. Brown

6 Kan. App. 2d 556 · Court of Appeals of Kansas · Jul 2, 1981

Exchange v. Schropp, 222 Kan. 612 , Syl. ¶ 8, 567 P.2d 1359 (1977). … People v. Collins, 53 Ill. App. 3d 114, 119 , 368 N.E.2d 685 (1977).

Brown v. Wright

25 Mo. App. 54 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 8, 1887

In Brown v. … See, also, Strawn v. Cogswell, 28 Ill. 457 ; McCoy v. Quick, 30 Wis. 521 ; De Witt v. Smith, 63 Mo. 263 .

Cousins v. Brown

539 S.W.2d 233 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 29, 1976

Brown, Earl D. Brown, and Daryl S. Brown, have filed in this court a motion for affirmance on certificate. The motion fully complies with the requirements of Rule 387, T.R.C.P.

People v. Brown

151 A.D.2d 199 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 16, 1989

see, People v Carrasquillo, 54 NY2d 248, 254 ; People v White, 16 NY2d 270, 273 , cert denied 386 US 1008 ). … Grega, 72 NY2d 489 ; People v Spann, 56 NY2d 469, 473-474 ; People v Iannone, 45 NY2d 589, 594-595 ).

Brown v. State

465 S.W.3d 516 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 21, 2015

ORDER PER CURIAM: Appellant Ronald Brown appeals from the Circuit Court of Cole County’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.

Jacobsen v. Brown

105 S.W.2d 1108 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 24, 1937

Hess v. Pawloski, 274 U.S. 352 , 47 S.Ct. 632 , 71 L.Ed. 1091 . … The record shows that the amendment was allowed to be filed after appellee had testified that she had boarded a bus at Springfield, Mo., and later transferred to another bus at Tulsa, Old., and that the bus operatives and

State v. Brown

184 Wash. App. 1008 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Oct 20, 2014

Brown v. State

764 So. 2d 463 · Court of Appeals of Mississippi · Mar 28, 2000

764 So.2d 463 (2000) Aaron BROWN, Appellant. v. STATE of Mississippi, Appellee. No. 98-KA-00646-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. March 28, 2000. Rehearing Denied June 6, 2000. … M.R.E. 613; Brown v. State, 556 So.2d 338, 341 (Miss.1990).

Brown v. State

245 Ga. App. 706 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Aug 29, 2000

Cummings v. State, 227 Ga. App. 564, 566 ( 489 SE2d 370 ) (1997). 4 Eason v. State, 234 Ga. App. 595, 596-597 ( 507 SE2d 175 ) (1998); Blair v. State, 216 Ga. … Eason v. State, supra at 597; Carter v. State, 188 Ga. App. 464, 465 (1) ( 373 SE2d 277 ) (1988). 6 (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Lathan v. State, 241 Ga. App. 750, 751 (1) ( 526 SE2d 350 ) (1999).

Grimble v. Brown

163 So. 2d 373 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 21, 1964

The word “connected” in this statute-has recently been defined by our brothers in; the Second Circuit in the case of Smith v. Brown, La.App., 147 So.2d 452 . … We can find no reason for excluding the-case before us from the principle set forth in Smith v. Brown, supra.

Brown v. State

859 N.E.2d 1269 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Jan 17, 2007

McManus v. State, 433 N.E.2d 775,779 (Ind.1982). Rather, we consider the evidence and all reasonable and logical inferences that may be drawn in the light most favorable to the judgment. Id. … Sheppard v. State, 484 N.E.2d 984, 988 (Ind.Ct.App.1985). Forms of pressure or influence include, but are not limited to, intimidation, physical force, threats, and harassment. Id.

Brown v. State

9 A.D.3d 23 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 13, 2004

Thereafter, in 2000, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of federal equal protection claims in an action brought by 33 of the 67 claimants in this action (Brown v City of Oneonta … Initially, we hold that the Second Circuit decision in Brown v City of Oneonta (supra) does not in any respect preclude claimants—on principles of collateral estoppel—from litigating their state constitutional equal protection

Matthias v. Brown

551 So. 2d 821 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 8, 1989

MATTHIAS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Evan D. BROWN and Protective Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellants. No. 88-803. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. November 8, 1989. … Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., 341 So.2d 332 (La.1976); Reck v. Stevens, 373 So.2d 498 (La.1979). We find sufficient basis for the award, therefore, we affirm it.