Case law

Mitchell v. Brown

43 A.D.3d 1009 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 18, 2007

nonparty Enes Alp. *1010 Richard Mitchell commenced this action against Kenneth Brown and the owner of the vehicle, the defendant Early Brown, asserting a cause of action predicated on the defendants’ alleged negligence, … Auth., 295 AD2d 297 [2002]; Cumberbatch v Blanchette, 35 AD3d 341 [2006]; Del Maestro v Grecco, 16 AD3d 364 [2005]).

State v. Brown

184 Wash. App. 1008 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Oct 20, 2014

Brown v. Levine

235 Ga. App. 63 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Nov 2, 1998

Appellant Henry Brown filed this direct appeal from prison after the trial court disposed of appellant Brown’s legal malpractice action via summary judgment. … Appellant Brown did not comply with the requisite discretionary procedures set forth in OCGA § 5-6-35 when he filed this appeal. We therefore have no jurisdiction to consider appellant Brown’s appeal. Botts v.

Brown v. State

380 So. 2d 1198 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 12, 1980

See Hallman v. State, 371 So.2d 482 (Fla.1979). GRIMES, C. J., and DANAHY and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Brown v. Lifford

136 N.C. App. 379 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 18, 2000

Brown, the minor child of plaintiffs Richard and Pauline Brown. … See Byrd v. Mortenson, 308 N.C. 536 , 302 S.E.2d 809 (1993).

Brown v. State

568 So. 2d 1003 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 26, 1990

Appellant Jeffrey Brown contests the twenty-six year sentence imposed by the trial court after a finding that he had violated the terms and conditions of community control. … See Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla.1989).

Brown v. Leach

189 A.D. 158 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 24, 1919

the first part, in writing, whether they elected to exercise the option which was thereby granted to them, to advance to the Island Oil and Transportation Corporation $1,000,000 in such amounts and at such times as the board … (May v. Hettrick Brothers Co., 181 App. Div. 3, 13 ; Stem v. Warren, 185 id. 823, 831.) It is my opinion that A. B.

State v. Brown

86 Haw. 523 · Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 1997

Guice v. Brown

334 Ga. App. 199 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Oct 22, 2015

GUICE v. BROWN. BRANCH, Judge. James Michael Brown and Ellis Willard Guice, an employee of the City of Rockmart, were involved in a car accident. … See Board of Regents v. Canas, 295 Ga. App. 505, 507 (1) (672 SE2d 471) (2009). the light most favorable to the nonmovant. Home Builders Assn. of Savannah v.

Brown v. State

798 So. 2d 773 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 22, 2001

BROWN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent. No. 2D01-2452. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. August 22, 2001. Rehearing Denied September 11, 2001. *774 Terry F. Brown, pro se. Robert A. … Brown's demand invalid simply because Mr. Brown has not obtained counsel or engaged in discovery. See Landry v. State, 666 So.2d 121 (Fla.1995).

State v. Brown

22 Conn. App. 521 · Connecticut Appellate Court · Aug 7, 1990

Brown, 187 Conn. 602, 608 , 447 A.2d 734 (1982); also fails. He did not present this theory to the trial court. … Under State v.

People v. Brown

140 A.D. 591 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 18, 1910

Defendants have been indicted because the accountant entered in the capital account of Brown the items “ Jan. 1, Sunds., $26,345.84.” … Hegeman v. Corrigan ( 195 N.

People v. Brown

153 A.D.3d 850 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 23, 2017

Whaley, 70 AD3d 570, 571 [2010]; People v Leak, 66 AD3d 403 , 404 [2009]; People v Rodriguez, 233 AD2d 409, 410 [1996]; People v Strunkey, 221 AD2d 387 [1995]; People v Boomer, 221 AD2d *852 351, 352 [1995]; People v Charles … v Yusuf, 19 NY3d 314, 321 [2012]; People v Muniz, 74 NY2d 464, 467-468 [1989]; People v Gonzalez, 61 NY2d 586, 590 [1984]).

Brown v. Raffety

234 Mo. App. 620 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 15, 1940

So far as we can see, the case of Egan v. Palmer, 293 S. W. 460 , is not in point. … [Hornsby v. Fisher, 85 S. W. (2d) 589 .] This case cites the Egan case, sttpra.

Follak v. Brown

530 S.W.2d 882 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 13, 1975

As indicated by the Dowden v. Fischer, supra, and Bull v. *885 Wilson, supra, cases, the Texas courts recognized the continuing jurisdiction laws of other states long before Texas adopted that concept for itself. … See Dowden v. Fischer, supra. Affirmed.

Brown v. State

591 So. 2d 1069 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 27, 1991

591 So.2d 1069 (1991) Curtis BROWN Sr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 90-2577. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. December 27, 1991. Richard L. … State, 571 So.2d 520 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), has been quashed by the supreme court in Carter v. State, 586 So.2d 340 (Fla. 1991).

People v. Brown

54 A.D.2d 719 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 12, 1976

Brown v. Hook

79 Cal. App. 2d 781 · California Court of Appeal · May 21, 1947

F. v. … O’Neill v.

People v. Brown

120 Mich. App. 765 · Michigan Court of Appeals · Nov 2, 1982

Inter alia: People v Cotton, 38 Mich App 763, 767 ; 197 NW2d 90 (1972); People v Thomas, 44 Mich App 649, 653 ; 205 NW2d 604 *775 (1973); People v Hoerl, 88 Mich App 693, 696 ; 278 NW2d 721 (1979). … See, People v Bradley, 106 Mich App 373, 381 ; 308 NW2d 216 (1981); People v Lonchar, 411 Mich 923 ; 308 NW2d 103 (1981); People v Dietrich, 412 Mich 904 ; 315 NW2d 123 (1982).

Brown v. Sheridan

83 Ga. App. 725 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Apr 13, 1951

The board was authorized to find from the testimony of Jeanette Brown that the 1945 Alabama divorce decree was void for fraud in its procurement, and that at the time Priscilla and Hoyt Sheridan were married in February, … On March 3, 1947, Jeanette Sheridan (Brown) obtained a valid divorce from the decedent in Madison County, Georgia, under the terms of which the defendant was forbidden to remarry.