Case law

Brown v. Cole

276 S.W.2d 369 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 11, 1955

Co. v. … In Lewis v.

Brown v. State

17 So. 3d 346 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 11, 2009

See Valdes v. … Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 , 52 S.Ct. 180 , 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932).

Brown v. State

173 Ga. App. 640 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Feb 19, 1985

Brown appeals his conviction of two counts of statutory rape. 1. … Brown v. State, 170 Ga. App. 305 ( 317 SE2d 307 ) (1984).

Brown v. Burke

26 S.W.2d 415 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 20, 1930

Prather v. McClelland, 76 Tex. 584 , 13 S. W. 543 . In Taylor v. … Haring v. Shelton, 103 Tex. 15 , 122 S. W. 13 ; Sims v. McMullan (Tex. Civ. App.) 22 S. W.(2d) 313 , and authorities there cited.

People v. Brown

268 A.D.2d 592 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 31, 2000

The testimony adduced at the hearing supports the court’s determination by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant committed the acts with which he was charged (see, CPL 410.70 [3]; People v Yutesler, 177 AD2d … Singletary v Dalsheim, 84 AD2d 553 ). In addition, the defendant’s resentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 ).

People v. Brown

4 Cal. App. 3d 382 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 16, 1970

He said his name was Brown and that he lived in West Oakland; he said he was walking home. Other officers soon arrived at the scene. A policeman properly advised Brown of his Miranda rights (see Miranda v. … Brown was ably represented at his trial by the Alameda County Public Defender’s office. The constitutional standards of representation set out in People v.

Brown v. Bullock

17 A.D.2d 424 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 20, 1962

Y. 229 ); Mink v. Keim ( 291 N. Y. 300 ); Greenberg v. De Hart (4 N Y 2d 511); Weisinger v. Berfond (11 A D 2d 817, affd. 9 N Y 2d 742) and other cases. … This is a power at once inherent and essential to the sound management of the court (Metropolitan Bank v. Pooley, 10 App. Cas. 210; Link v. Wabash R. R. Co., 370 U. S. 626 ; Stewart v. Butler, 27 Misc. 708 ; Civ. Prac.

Commonwealth v. Brown

428 Pa. Super. 587 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 20, 1993

In Commonwealth v. … See Commonwealth v. Brown, 312 Pa.Super. 383 , 458 A.2d 1012 (1983) (judicial notice intended to avoid proof of fact so well established as to be a matter of common knowledge) See also Commonwealth v.

Harper v. Brown

122 Ga. App. 316 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Jun 24, 1970

See also Code § 105-108; McGuire v. Gem City Motors, 296 FSupp. 541; Fulton Bag &c. Mills v. Eudaly, 95 Ga. App. 644 ( 98 SE2d 235 ); Fielder v. Davison, 139 Ga. 509 ( 77 SE 618 ). … Speed zones are established by the State Highway Board as set out in Code Ann. *319 § 68-1627, are posted by it in accordance with Code Ann. § 68-1610.

People v. Brown

57 A.D.3d 238 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 4, 2008

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). … Garcia, 29 AD3d 255, 263 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 789 [2006]; People v Jennis, 299 AD2d 921 [2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 583 [2003]).

Brown v. Dearborn

52 Or. App. 237 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 18, 1981

In Lee v. Brown, 264 Or 341 , 505 P2d 924 (1973), it was used to support this proposition: "Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy at law to which the rules of procedure relating to actions at law are applicable.” … Justice Rossman, specially concurring in Lafferty v.

State v. Brown

170 N.C. App. 601 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 7, 2005

Defendant Billy Ray Brown appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion for post-conviction DNA testing under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-269 (2003). … State v. Brown, 163 N.C. App. 784 , 595 S.E.2d 238 (2004) (unpublished). A full account of the facts are set forth in that opinion. The facts pertinent to this appeal are as follows.

Com. v. Brown

181 A.3d 1251 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 19, 2017

Brown v. Lane

383 S.W.2d 649 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 9, 1964

Helen Irene Reib left a will in which she named Helen Brown as Independent Executrix. The will provided that Margaret Lane was to have a ring and that the remainder of the estate should go to Helen Brown. … Appellant cites us to the opinion of our Supreme Court in Krueger v.

Brown v. State

142 Ga. App. 247 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · May 9, 1977

Charging the jury on the contentions of the *248 defendant is not a burden shifting charge under our decision in Moran v. State, 139 Ga. App. 274 ( 228 SE2d 216 ). The holdings on this issue found in Henderson v. … Baker v. State, 88 Ga. App. 894, 895 ( 78 SE2d 357 ).

State v. Brown

205 Ariz. 325 · Court of Appeals of Arizona · May 23, 2003

United States v. … In State v.

People v. Brown

134 A.D.3d 657 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 29, 2015

Brown v. Rosario

272 A.D.2d 205 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 18, 2000

perceive no basis to disturb the challenged custody determination, particularly since the determination, premised largely on the hearing court’s credibility findings, is entitled to our deference (see, Matter of Clara L. v

Durre v. Brown

7 Ind. App. 127 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 1893

Nelson v. Board, etc., 105 Ind. 287 ; Anderson Law Dic. … Burnside v. Ennis, 43 Ind. 411 ; Knight v. State, 70 Ind. 375 ; McClellan v. Binkley, 78 Ind. 503 ; Stout v. Duncan, 87 Ind. 383 ; Chicago, etc., R. W. Co. v. Johnston, 89 Ind. 88 .

People v. Brown

36 Ill. App. 3d 416 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 10, 1976

Nor are the cases of People v. Husar, 22 Ill. App. 3d 758 , 318 N.E.2d 24 , or People v. Bass, 101 Ill. … Stat. 1973, ch. 38, par. 16 — 1(e); People v. Tassone, 41 Ill. 2d 7 , 241 N.E.2d 419 ; People v. Kurtz, 69 Ill.