Case law

Glynn-Brunswick Memorial Hospital Authority v. Benton

303 Ga. App. 305 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Mar 31, 2010

Brown v. Amerson. 7 Rather, the plaintiff must produce evidence “of what foreign substance, condition, or hazard caused [her] to slip and fall.” Mansell v. Starr Enterprises/Texaco. 8 This Benton failed to do. … App. 856, 856-857 ( 600 SE2d 834 ) (2004). 5 Dixon v. Infinity Broadcasting East, 289 Ga. App. 71, 73 (2) ( 656 SE2d 211 ) (2007). 6 Pennington v. WJL, Inc., 263 Ga. App. 758, 760 (1) ( 589 SE2d 259 ) (2003). 7 Brown v.

Brown v. Schriver

254 Pa. Super. 468 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 28, 1978

See also Reifel v. Hershey Estates, supra. In sum, under Unangst v. … See Unangst v. Whitehouse, supra.

A.R. v. Brown

103 Ark. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 18, 2008

Brown declined. … Hurtt v. Hurtt, 93 Ark. App. 37 , 216 S.W.3d 604 (2005).

Brown v. State

883 S.W.2d 389 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Aug 30, 1994

Appellant, Dennis Jon Brown, was convicted by a jury of the offense of possession with the intent to deliver a controlled substance. … In Beasley v.

Brown v. State

11 Fla. L. Weekly 211 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 16, 1986

BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 85-25. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. January 16, 1986. James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Larry B. Henderson, Asst. … See Brown v. State, 457 So.2d 1079 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). On remand appellant elected to be sentenced under the sentencing guidelines and the trial court departed from the recommended guideline sentencing range.

People v. Brown

147 Cal. App. 2d 352 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 31, 1956

In United States v. … We have examined the cases of People v. Cahan, 44 Cal.2d *357 434 [ 282 P.2d 905 ]; People v. Brown, 45 Cal.2d 640 [ 290 P.2d 528 ]; People v.

Lynch v. Brown

489 So. 2d 65 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jun 4, 1986

v. … Since Lynch admitted in his affidavit that he had been told the stairs were dangerous, Brown argues she did not breach any duty to appellant. *66 We cannot accept Brown's argument that Wood v.

Brown v. State

677 So. 2d 395 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jul 24, 1996

See State v. Hart, 668 So.2d 589 (Fla.1996). Condition (A) of Brown’s probation, which was not orally pronounced, requires him to pay for alcohol/drug testing. … See Reiter v. State, 674 So.2d 189 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). Thus, we strike that portion of condition (A) requiring Brown to pay for alcohol and drug screening.

Norris v. Brown

77 Ohio App. 3d 813 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 24, 1991

Brown, the Registrar of the Bureau of Motor Vehicles, contained an erroneous statement as to the consequences of a refusal to submit to a chemical test following an arrest for operating a motor vehicle under the influence … Although Ohio courts have held that it is unnecessary for a defendant to subjectively understand the consequences of the refusal and that the refusal need not be knowingly or intelligently made, see Hoban v.

Brown v. State

15 Ga. App. 484 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Dec 22, 1914

Hughes v. State, 2 Ga. App. 29 ( 58 S. E. 390 ). Thereafter the jailer testified that the defendant sold him a pistol which was delivered to the jailer at the same time the defendant was placed in his custody. … The jailer testified: “Will Brown and another man made a trade with me to sell me two thirty-two Smith & Wesson pistols that they claimed were theirs. These were the pistols that were brought in by Mr. Hodge or Mr.

Brown v. Appelman

241 A.D.2d 279 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 27, 1998

; Matter of Pirro v LaCava, supra; People v Shulman, 172 Misc 2d 535 ; People v Williamson, 172 Misc 2d 172 ; People v Prater, 170 Misc 2d 327 ; People v Bastien, 170 Misc 2d 103 ; People v Hale, 167 Misc 2d 872 ). … , 172 Misc 2d 172 , supra; People v Prater, 170 Misc 2d 327 , supra; People v Bastien, 170 Misc 2d 103 , supra; People v Hale, 167 Misc 2d 872 , supra).

Brown v. Madison

139 Ohio App. 3d 867 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 30, 2000

Brown, administrator of the estate of Henrietta Brown, appeals the trial court’s ruling granting summary judgment for supplemental defendant-appellee Allstate Indemnity Company (hereinafter “Allstate”). … Mootispaw v. Eckstein (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 383 , 667 N.E.2d 1197 . Doubts must be resolved in favor of the nonmoving party. Murphy v. Reynoldsburg (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 356 , 604 N.E.2d 138 . In Holliman v.

Brown v. Schendelman

34 Del. 50 · Superior Court of Delaware · Apr 5, 1928

Other cases to the same effect are Bamberger v. Railway Co., 95 Term. 18, 31 S. W. 163 , 28 L. R. A. 486, 49 Am. St. Rep. 909 ; Cirosky v. Smathers, 128 S. C. 358, 122 S. E. 864 ; Ill. Cen. R. R. Co. v. … Even in the leading case of Hartfield v.

Brown v. State

10 Ga. App. 216 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Dec 19, 1911

Killebrew as to certain statements made to him by James Brown” — is not subject to the criticism that it was an expression or intimation of opinion by the court as to ^hat had been testified in such ease. 2. … Brown, solicitor-general, contra. 3. No other error, is assigned, and the verdict is supported by evidence. Judgment affirmed.

Brown v. State

268 Ga. App. 24 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Jun 18, 2004

Bates v. State, 259 Ga. App. 232,233 (1) ( 576 SE2d 619 ) (2003), citing Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). 2 (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Ross v. State, 264 Ga. … Accord Chergi v. State, 234 Ga. App. 548, 550 (4) ( 507 SE2d 795 ) (1998). 3 (Citation omitted.) Roebuck v. State, 277 Ga. 200, 203 (1) ( 586 SE2d 651 ) (2003). 4 Ross, supra, citing Jackson v.

State v. Brown

106 Or. App. 291 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 6, 1991

Defendant Brown had shown the informant 10 clear plastic bags that she said contained methamphetamine. … See State v. Crotsley, 308 Or 272 , 779 P2d 600 (1989); State v. Owens, 102 Or App 448 , 450 n 2, 795 P2d 569 , rev den 311 Or 13 (1990); State v. Atkinson, supra.

Brown v. Chiang

198 Cal. App. 4th 1203 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 30, 2011

(Professional Engineers, supra, 50 Cal.4th at p. 1015 , citing Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 181-196 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 487 , 624 P.2d 1215 ], State Trial Attorneys’ Assn. v. … (Id. at p. 1015, citing Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown, supra, 29 Cal.3d at pp. 181-196, State Trial Attorneys’ Assn. v. State of California, supra, 63 Cal.App.3d at p. 303 and Marine Forests Society v.

State v. Brown

140 Haw. 20 · Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 2017

Brown v. Goord

290 A.D.2d 901 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 31, 2002

administrative reversal and expungement, petitioner has in fact received all of the relief to which he could have been entitled and, therefore, dismissal of this appeal as moot is appropriate (see, e.g., Matter of Sutton v

Brown v. State

204 Ga. App. 629 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Jun 1, 1992

Brown was tried before a jury in state court and convicted of speeding. He appeals from the denial of his motion for new trial. … Brown, pro se. Nancy N. Bills, Solicitor, Alan S. Clarke, Assistant Solicitor, for appellee.