Case law

Brown v. Gonzales

77 So. 2d 887 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Feb 14, 1955

Jacob BROWN v. Ernest GONZALES et al. No. 20351. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Orleans. February 14, 1955. *888 Harry R. Cabral and Harry R. Cabral, Jr., New Orleans, for plaintiffs-appellants. Henry L. … Brown, as the result of a collision in the intersection of St.

Brown v. Commonwealth

25 Va. App. 171 · Court of Appeals of Virginia · Jul 8, 1997

Floyd Keith Brown was convicted by a jury of statutory burglary, rape, and two counts of forcible sodomy. … See Brown v. Commonwealth, 23 Va.App. 225 , 475 S.E.2d 836 (1996). We granted the Commonwealth a rehearing en banc.

Brown v. Yocum

113 Cal. App. 621 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 24, 1931

“I instruct you that this is a case between Viola May Brown, on the one hand, and W. A. Yocum, on the other. … (Pierce v. United Gas & Elec. Co., 161 Cal. 176 [ 118 Pac. 700 ]; Curtis v. *625 McAuliffe, 106 Cal. App. 1 [ 288 Pac. 675, 679 ].)

Brown v. Baker

197 Ga. App. 466 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Nov 5, 1990

U-Haul of Western Ga. v. Ford, supra at 746 (4). … Ford, supra, and Buffalo Cab Co. v. Williams, supra, are, therefore, distinguishable. 5. Moreover, the evidence in U-Haul Co. of Western Ga. v. Ford, supra, and Buffalo Cab Co. v.

Brown v. Commonwealth

98 Ky. 652 · Court of Appeals of Kentucky · Feb 7, 1896

The liquor, for the selling of which the accused was indicted and convicted, was sold in Pineville, under a license from the board of council of that city, the lower court taking the view of the counsel for the Commonwealth … By this provision of the charter of the cities of the fourth class the power to regulate or prohibit the sale of liquor was given their respective boards of council.

People v. Brown

2025 NY Slip Op 04379 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 25, 2025

People v Brown ( 2025 NY Slip Op 04379 ) People v Brown 2025 NY Slip Op 04379 Decided on July 25, 2025 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431 … LAMAR BROWN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

People v. Brown

57 Ill. App. 3d 528 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jan 25, 1978

PRESIDING JUSTICE JIGANTI delivered the opinion of the court: A jury found the defendant, Patsy Brown, guilty of both the attempt to murder Cheryl Edwards (Ill. Rev. … (People v. Brown (1973), 9 Ill. App. 3d 730 , 293 N.E.2d 1 .) The existence of a time interval between the defendant’s act and death does not preclude such a causal link (People v. Hughes (1977), 46 Ill.

Meegan v. Brown

74 A.D.3d 1824 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 11, 2010

Brown v. State

119 N.E.3d 232 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 2018

Wheat v. Brown

3 Kan. App. 431 · Court of Appeals of Kansas · Feb 6, 1896

Brown was not a trespasser. … (Rich v. Lappin, 43 Kan. 666 ; The State v. Bennington, 44 id. 583 ; The State v. Potter, 15 id. 303; City of Atchison v. Jansen, 21 id. 560.)

People v. Brown

145 A.D.3d 1549 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 23, 2016

Montanez, 135 AD3d 528, 528 [2016], lv denied 27 NY3d 1072 [2016]; People v Magin, 1 AD3d 1024, 1025 [2003]; see generally People v Rivera, 259 AD2d 316, 316-317 [1999]). … People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]).

Com. v. Brown

160 A.3d 262 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 23, 2017

Brown v. Hall

80 N.M. 556 · New Mexico Court of Appeals · Aug 22, 1969

Simon v. Akin, 79 N.M. 689 , 448 P.2d 795 (1968); Apodaca v. Miller, 79 N.M. 160 , 441 P.2d 200 (1968). … The circumstances are closer to those of Mozert v. Noeding, 76 N.M. 396 , 415 P.2d 364 (1966) than to Boyce v. Brewington, supra.

People v. Brown

100 A.D.2d 879 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 9, 1984

People v Ozarowski, supra, p 491, n 3 ). 11People v Castaldo ( 72 AD2d 568 ), relied upon by the trial court, does not conflict with our holding in the case at bar. … Here, the threat to use the stickball bat as a weapon was implicit in Brown’s conduct (cf. People v Woods, 41 NY2d 279 ).

Hotze v. Brown

9 S.W.3d 404 · Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · Dec 9, 1999

See id. art V-a, § 2. … The court noted that the board’s actions would deprive him of his right to participate in the legislative process, and therefore, it found he had standing.

People v. Brown

179 Cal. App. 3d 207 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 26, 1986

Brown. “The Court: Well, there is no hiatis [sic] of representation, as far as the court is concerned. Miss DiPietro is your lawyer, Mr. Brown, she is present, she is aware of what is going on. … Brown. What is it? And then, when you say this time, don’t speak again until I call upon you. [¶] What is it?

Brown v. State

181 Ind. App. 102 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Jun 20, 1979

In State v. … Arizona v. Washington, supra; United States v. Jorn, supra.

Brown v. Annucci

145 A.D.3d 1572 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 23, 2016

Kirtland v. Brown

2019 Ohio 748 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 2019

[Cite as Kirtland v. Brown, 2019-Ohio-748.] … Knapp v.

State v. Brown

2015 La.App. 4 Cir. 1319 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 20, 2016

Brown entered the diversion program, much less waived his speedy trial rights or agreed to a waiver of them. See Brookhart v. … Zedner v.