Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.61s
31 Ohio Law. Abs. 530 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 26, 1940
Orose v Hodge, 132 Oh St 697, 2nd syllabus. Dayton v DeBrosse, Montgomery County Court of Appeals, 62 Oh Ap 232. After diligent search we have been able to find a copy of the traffic ordinances. … To the same effect is Schwartz v Badila, 133 Oh St 441. See Swoboda v Brown, 125 Oh St 512, syllabus 5. Our Court has had occasion to pass upon affidavits drawn under municipal speed ordinances.
Cited 5 timesPublished132 Ill. App. 2d 875 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jul 12, 1971
.-1966), 215 N.E.2d 539 ; People v. Berger (1918), 169 N.Y.S. 319 , 321; People v. … (People v. Evrard (1965), 55 Ill.App.2d 270, 273 .)
Cited 11 timesPublished30 A.D.2d 279 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 8, 1968
(People v. Fiore, 12 N Y 2d 188; People v. Robinson, 28 A D 2d 916.) In People v. Morhouse (21 N Y 2d 66, 74), the court stated: “ As we indicated in People v. … (People v. Dixon, 231 N. Y. 111, 116-117 ; see, also, People v. Crum, 272 N. Y. 348, 353-354 ; People v. Malizia, 4 N Y 2d 22, 27; People v. Reddy, 261 N.
Cited 13 timesPublished927 N.W.2d 672 · Court of Appeals of Iowa · Jul 19, 2017
P. 6.904 Jonathan Brown appeals his second-degree-murder conviction. AFFIRMED. AFFIRMED.
Cited 0 timesPublished513 S.W.3d 359 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 2016
Oscar Brown appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of attempted first-degree child molestation, kidnapping, second-degree assault, and armed criminal action.
Cited 0 timesPublished155 A.D.3d 509 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 21, 2017
]” of depraved indifference (People v Suarez, 6 NY3d 202, 214 [2005])—while running away, without looking at where he was shooting, abundantly demonstrated a depraved indifference to human life (see People v Russell, 91 NY2d … Brown, 21 NY3d 739, 750-751 [2013]).
Cited 3 timesPublished209 A.D.2d 233 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 10, 1994
Mere length of delay does not entitle a defendant to a hearing where, as here, there is no showing of prejudice and no dispute as to the facts showing that the investigation proceeded in good faith (cf., People v Singer, … error in not submitting an "accomplice as a matter of fact” charge was harmless in view of the overwhelming corroborative proof of defendant’s participation as getaway driver in this execution style slaying (see, People v
Cited 14 timesPublished6 Ga. App. 356 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Jun 15, 1909
Brown was convicted of arson, and to the overruling of his motion for a new trial he brings error. … City and Suburban Ry. v. Findley, 76 Ga. 311 (3); Whitlow v. State, 74 Ga. 819 (3); Elder v. Cozart, 59 Ga. 200 Judgment affirmed.
Cited 9 timesPublished77 A.D.3d 1053 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 21, 2010
Due to these omissions during the plea colloquy, the court could not be assured that defendant had a full understanding of the plea and its consequences (see People v Thomas, 68 AD3d 1445, 1447 [2009]). … of that sentence in order to knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently choose among alternative courses of action, the failure of a court to advise of post-release supervision requires reversal of the conviction” (People v
Cited 4 timesPublished192 Wash. App. 1076 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Mar 15, 2016
Cited 0 timesPublished67 A.D.3d 1197 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 19, 2009
MacCracken v Miller, 291 NY 55, 62 [1943]; see People v Lopez-Aguilar, 64 AD3d 1037, 1037 [2009]). … Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]; People v Stevens, 65 AD3d 759 , 761 n 1 [2009]). .
Cited 7 timesPublished2026 NY Slip Op 00384 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 28, 2026
People v Brown ( 2026 NY Slip Op 00384 ) People v Brown 2026 NY Slip Op 00384 Decided on January 28, 2026 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § … No. 70764/23) [*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent, v Carlos Brown, appellant. Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Victoria Broderick of counsel), for appellant.
Cited 0 timesPublished122 S.W.2d 684 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 30, 1938
Brown, three of her sons, and her daughter-in-law.. All of them were out of the car and on the ground near it when it was struck. … McFaddin v. Hebert, 118 Tex. 314 , 15 S.W.2d 213, 217 ; Hall v. Henry, Tex.Civ.App., 239 5.W. 1015; 41 Tex.Jur., § 342, p. 1206.
Cited 6 timesPublished100 Wash. App. 104 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Mar 27, 2000
995 P.2d 1278 (2000) 100 Wash.App. 104 STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Jacob Patrick BROWN, Appellant. State of Washington, Respondent, v. Marshall C. Harris, Appellant. Nos. 41310-4-I, 41524-7-I. … The court ordered counts I, IV, V and VII *1282 against Brown to run consecutively, with counts II and III running concurrently with the other counts.
Cited 10 timesPublished180 Ga. App. 555 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Oct 15, 1986
On September 28, 1982, Rex Michael Brown (“plaintiff hus *556 band”) was involved in an automobile collision with Joseph Keith Bailey. … See Jones v. Brown, 174 Ga. App. 632 ( 331 SE2d 24 ). Compare Echevarria v. Hudgins, 173 Ga. App. 39, 40 (2) ( 325 SE2d 423 ). 2.
Cited 10 timesPublished234 Md. App. 145 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Sep 27, 2017
In Mustafa v. State, the case on which Mr. … Brown’s gloss on the Act would create serious practical problems. See CashCall, Inc. v. Md. Comm’r of Fin.
Cited 3 timesPublished40 Okla. Crim. 1 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 18, 1928
On March 19, 1927, the defendant, Dave Brown, was brought before the district judge of Alfalfa county, and the district court was regularly convened, and defendant entered a plea of guilty to the charge in the information … That said defendant, Dave Brown, is now and on the 19th day of March, 1927, a minor of the age of 19 years, and that said defendant did not have a full and complete preliminary hearing as provided by law, prior to the filing
Cited 7 timesPublished
Ask Donna