Case law

Fontenot v. Brown

53 So. 2d 446 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 29, 1951

Furthermore, in Holmes v. … Campbell v. F. Hollier & Sons, La.App., 4 So.2d 576 .” For the reasons assigned the judgment of the lower court is affirmed, at appellant’s cost. Judgment affirmed.

Com. v. Brown

175 A.3d 1042 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 1, 2017

State v. Brown

194 Wash. App. 1011 · Court of Appeals of Washington · May 24, 2016

Uhr v. Brown

191 S.W. 379 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 20, 1916

Brown v. Uhr, 187 S.W. 381 ; Uhr v. Lambert, 188 S.W. 946 . But are Carruthers and White interfering with such right? … In the case of the State v.

Com. v. Brown

174 A.3d 102 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 2017

Brown v. Heggie

876 S.W.2d 98 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 24, 1993

That Grandon Heggie shall pay to Pamela Kay Brown the sum of twenty-five dollars ($25.00) per week per child for the remaining two (2) children, Kevin and Connie. … Likewise, the holding in Rutledge v. Barrett provides that the statute specifically bars retroactive modification.

People v. Brown

142 A.D.2d 683 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 18, 1988

The decision as to whether to permit a defendant to withdraw a previously entered plea of guilty rests within the sound discretion of the sentencing court (see, People v Melendez, 135 AD2d 660 , lv denied 70 NY2d 1008 ). … , 117 AD2d 633 , lv denied 68 NY2d 1004 ; People v McClendon, 114 AD2d 425 , lv denied 66 NY2d 921 ). *684 Mollen, P.

Brown v. Goord

19 A.D.3d 833 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 16, 2005

Vega v Smith, 66 NY2d 130, 139 [1985]; Matter of Glover v Beaury, 205 AJ)2d 995 [1994], appeal dismissed 84 NY2d 922 [1994]; Matter of Patterson v Senkowski, 204 AD2d 831, 832 [1994]). … His claim of retaliation presented an issue of credibility for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Jamison v Goord, 8 AD3d 860, 860 [2004]).

State v. Brown

112 Ohio App. 3d 583 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 15, 1996

State v. … State v. Brown (1988), 38 Ohio St.3d 305, 314 , 528 N.E.2d 523, 535-536 . Appellant has failed to show that the jury was *606 influenced by the media to the extent that they were biased or prejudiced against her.

People v. Brown

2025 NY Slip Op 04338 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 25, 2025

People v Brown ( 2025 NY Slip Op 04338 ) People v Brown 2025 NY Slip Op 04338 Decided on July 25, 2025 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431 … BROWN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. ROSENBERG LAW FIRM, BROOKLYN (MORGAN NAMIEN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (AMY N. WALENDZIAK OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

State v. Brown

217 N.C. App. 566 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 20, 2011

State v. Brown, 142 N.C. App. 491, 493 , 543 S.E.2d 192, 193 (2001). … In State v. Choplek, _ N.C.

Sinnett v. Sinnett

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 6, 2025

See State v. … See McConnell v. McConnell, 151 N.C. App. 622, 629-30, 566 S.E.2d 801, 806 (2002) (“Though [the] plaintiff relies on Brewer v. Brewer, 139 N.C.App. 222, 533 S.E.2d 541 (2000) and Browning v.

Brown v. Lynaugh

817 S.W.2d 813 · Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · Oct 10, 1991

Plaintiff, Jerry Brown, a/d/a/ Jerry Davis, is a prisoner at Texas Department of Justice, Institutional Division (TDC). The plaintiff’s cause of action is based on the Wrongful Imprisonment Act. … .”); Johnson v. Lynaugh, 800 S.W.2d 936, 938 (Tex.

Brown v. Wise

174 A.3d 1215 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 25, 2017

Brown v. Labow

69 Cal. Rptr. 3d 417 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 5, 2007

Labow asserted that the assets of Brown Wholesale Electric were sold in 1998 pursuant to an agreement negotiated and approved by its board of directors. The board consisted of Ross, Mr. Brown, and Ray Sullivan. Ms. … Although Ross was a board member, he never attended any board meetings. This was because there were never any board meetings to attend.

Brown v. Grimes

74 Ind. App. 655 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Jan 26, 1921

Underwood indorsed the check, “Hiram Brown, by J. H. Underwood, Atty., J. H. Underwood,” presented the same to the bank on which it was drawn, received the money thereon, and embezzled it. … W. 863 ; North End Paper Co. v. State Bank, etc. (1916), 198 Ill. App. 242 ; Wiley v. Mahood (1877), 10 W. Va. 206, 223 ; Black v. Drake (1874), 2 Colo. 330 . See, also, Holliday v. Thomas (1883), 90 Ind. 398 .

Com. v. Brown

174 A.3d 37 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 1, 2017

Molasky v. Brown

720 S.W.2d 412 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 25, 1986

Parmer v. Bean, 636 S.W.2d 691, 695 (Mo.App.1982). … Harting v. Stout, 690 S.W.2d 458, 459 (Mo.App.1985).

Com. v. Brown

175 A.3d 1107 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 23, 2017

Com. v. Brown

170 A.3d 1202 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 9, 2017