Case law

People v. Brown

147 A.D.3d 570 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 16, 2017

]; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 666 [1988]; People v Wallace, 247 AD2d 257 [1st Dept 1998]). … Thus, defendant withdrew his request to proceed pro se, or at least, failed to make an unequivocal request to do so (see People v McIntyre, 36 NY2d 10, 17 [1974]).

Doble v. Brown

20 Ind. App. 12 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Apr 20, 1898

On the 28th day of January, 1896, appellant filed a motion in this court entitled Budd Doble v. Samuel A. Brown, in which the court was asked to substitute for Samuel A. … Taylor v. Elliott, 52 Ind. 588 ; Taylor v. Elliott, 53 Ind. 441 ; Branham v. Johnson, 62 Ind. 259 ; Moore v. Stack, 140 Ind. 38 . In the case of Moore v.

Brown v. State

314 Ga. App. 212 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Feb 17, 2012

Blackford v. State, 251 Ga. App. 324, 327 (3) ( 554 SE2d 290 ) (2001); see also Carreno v. State, 272 Ga. … See Wright v. State, 302 Ga.

Brown v. Gow

126 Cal. App. 113 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 20, 1932

State v. Brown

142 N.C. App. 491 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 20, 2001

State v. Williams, 280 N.C. 132, 137 , 184 S.E.2d 875, 878 (1971); and State v. Winford, 279 N.C. 58 , 181 S.E.2d 423 (1971). … State v. Alston, 307 N.C. 321, 341 , 298 S.E.2d 631, 644-45 (1983); see also State v. Atkinson, 275 N.C. 288 , 167 S.E.2d 241 (1969), death sentence vacated, 403 U.S. 948 , 29 L. Ed. 2d 859 (1971).

People v. Brown

260 Cal. App. 2d 745 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 2, 1968

(People v. Ward, 66 Cal.2d 571, 574 [ 58 Cal.Rptr. 313 , 426 P.2d 881 ]; People v. Coley, 257 Cal.App.2d 787, 793 [ 65 Cal.Rptr. 559 ].) … As expressly stated in Barker v. Municipal Court, 64 Cal.2d 806, 812 [ 51 Cal.Rptr. 921 , 415 P.2d 809 ], and Zimmerman v.

State v. Brown

2012 Ohio 5484 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 28, 2012

[Cite as State v. Brown, 2012-Ohio-5484.] … The substantive facts of the incident are set out in our decision resolving Brown’s direct appeal. State v. Brown, 9th Dist.

People v. Brown

214 A.D.2d 438 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 20, 1995

Martinez, 82 NY2d 436, 440-441, 443 ; see also, People v Badillo, 207 AD2d 742 ; People v Torres, 204 AD2d 131 , lv denied 84 NY2d 833 ; People v Ayala, 202 AD2d 262 , lv denied 83 NY2d 908 ). … 75 NY2d 918 ; People v Rodriguez, 203 AD2d 92 ).

Brown v. Zimmerman

160 S.W.3d 695 · Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · Apr 20, 2005

Medina Evelina Littlejohn Brown 1 is the ex-wife of Samuel Mort Zimmerman who is the founder and President of Inter-federal Capital, Inc. … See Williams v.

State v. Brown

186 Ga. App. 155 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Mar 2, 1988

Illinois v. Gates, 462 U. S. 213, 238 (103 SC 2317, 76 LE2d 527) (1984); State v. Stephens, 252 Ga. 181, 182 ( 311 SE2d 823 ) (1984). … State v. Porter, 167 Ga. App. 293 ( 306 SE2d 377 ) (1983); McGuire v. State, 136 Ga. App. 271 (2) ( 220 SE2d 769 ) (1975); Maxwell v. State, 127 Ga. App. 168, 170 ( 193 SE2d 14 ) (1972). Compare Borders v.

Brown v. State

18 Okla. Crim. 509 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 9, 1921

In De Graff v. State, 2 Okla. … In the case of Hamil v. State, 8 Okla. Cr. 119 , 126 Pac. 591 , it is held: “To sustain a . conviction of crime, each and every 'material element must be supported by the evidence.” In the case of Henry v.

Com. v. Brown

174 A.3d 78 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 16, 2017

State v. Brown

194 Wash. App. 1011 · Court of Appeals of Washington · May 24, 2016

Brown v. DOC

174 A.3d 1206 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 8, 2017

Board of Claims, Inmate No. DL-4686 Affirmed

Brown v. Wise

174 A.3d 1215 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 25, 2017

Brown v. Wise

174 A.3d 1215 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 25, 2017

Brown v. Wise

174 A.3d 1215 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 25, 2017

State v. Brown

194 Wash. App. 1035 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Jun 20, 2016

Brown v. Heggie

876 S.W.2d 98 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 24, 1993

That Grandon Heggie shall pay to Pamela Kay Brown the sum of twenty-five dollars ($25.00) per week per child for the remaining two (2) children, Kevin and Connie. … Likewise, the holding in Rutledge v. Barrett provides that the statute specifically bars retroactive modification.

Com. v. Brown

174 A.3d 102 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 2017