Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSA

10,000+ results

1.66s

  • Brown v. Brown

    12 A.D.3d 176 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 4, 2004

    “Beneficiaries enjoy only expectancy interests and not vested legal rights” (Blackmon v Estate of Battcock, 78 NY2d 735, 739 [1991]). … Capital v Karp Family Assoc., 285 AD2d 361, 362 [2001]). In any event, the tort claims were merely duplicative of the insufficiently pleaded breach of contract causes of action herein.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    300 So. 2d 719 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 10, 1974

    300 So.2d 719 (1974) Evelyn BROWN, Appellant, v. Raymond Pierre BROWN, Jr., Appellee. No. T-423. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. September 10, 1974. Rehearing Denied October 15, 1974. *720 W.A. … and EVELYN BROWN are hereby dissolved. "3) The Wife shall have custody of the children of the parties, namely: GREGORY BROWN, STUART BROWN, PRESTON BROWN and ROGER BROWN, and the Husband shall have liberal rights of visitation

    Cited 75 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    2016 Ark. App. 172 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 16, 2016

    In Farrell v. Farrell, 2013 Ark. … We note in Moore v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    172 Ky. 754 · Court of Appeals of Kentucky · Dec 15, 1916

    Pile v. Pile, 94 Ky. 308 . But that principle does not hold in the present case. … J., section 226, page 133; Zartman v. Waterloo First National Bank, 216 U. S. 134 , 54 L. Ed. 418 . Hence the title acquired by the trustee in the bankruptcy proceeding referred to was subject to Mrs.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    537 S.W.2d 434 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 18, 1976

    Anderson v. Robertson, 402 S.W.2d 589, 593 [3, 4] (Mo.App.1966); Biggs v. Biggs, supra. … Franklin v. Franklin, 283 S.W.2d 483, 485 [6] (Mo. banc 1955); Fawkes v. Fawkes, 204 S.W.2d 132, 134 (Mo.App.1947).

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    208 N.J. Super. 372 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 28, 1986

    Super. 372 (1986) 506 A.2d 29 LEANDER BROWN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. KENNETH BROWN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Submitted February 4, 1986. … Plaintiff Leander Brown filed a divorce complaint against defendant Kenneth A. Brown on March 27, 1981, seeking to dissolve their nearly 22-year marriage on the ground of extreme cruelty.

    Cited 74 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    123 A.D.3d 596 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 16, 2014

    enumerated factors, explained how the factors support an upward deviation from the $13,100 a month in guideline support, and found that $37,000 per month was not “unjust or inappropriate” under the circumstances (Lennox v … The court providently exercised its discretion in making the award of temporary maintenance taxable to the wife (see Lasry *597 v Lasry, 180 AD2d 488, 489 [1st Dept 1992]; Siskind v Siskind, 89 AD3d 832, 833 [2d Dept 2011

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    206 Pa. Super. 439 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 6, 1965

    Fell v. Brown, 100 Pa. Superior Ct. 353 . Experience has shown that generally a child’s welfare is best promoted by entrusting its future to its parents. … Brown v. Lane, 90 Pa. Superior Ct. 350, 352 ; Com. ex rel., Appellant, v. Tyrrell, 115 Pa. Superior Ct. 385, 386, 387 , 175 A. 723 ; Com. ex rel. Conway v. Preston, 148 Pa. Superior Ct. 182, 186 , 24 A. 2d 772 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    463 N.E.2d 310 · Indiana Court of Appeals · May 15, 1984

    Appellant Russell Brown appeals from a trial court order transferring custody of his two minor daughters, Darlene and Leora, from him to their mother Martha Brown. … Pribush v. Roy, (1983) Ind.App., 456 N.E.2d 747 ; Moutaw v. Moutaw, (1981) Ind.App., 420 N.E.2d 1294 ; Whitman v.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    315 So. 2d 15 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 27, 1975

    315 So.2d 15 (1975) Frederick Merrill BROWN, Appellant, v. Margaret Amanda BROWN, Appellee. No. 74-1177. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. May 27, 1975. … Morse v. Morse, Fla.App. 1966, 191 So.2d 449 .

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    590 S.W.2d 808 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 15, 1979

    On February 22, 1978, Ellen Hammonds Brown sued Clifford Brown for divorce and sought a division of the property. … That Petitioner, Ellen Hammonds Brown, be awarded the following listed assets, free and clear of any claims of Respondent, Clifford Brown, and that Respondent is divested of any and all interest or claim of any kind in such

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Denaples v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board

    150 A.3d 1034 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 2, 2016

    Philadelphia Entertainment and Development Partners, L.P. v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board, 34 A.3d 261, 267 (Pa. … Brown v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 673 A.2d 21, 23 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1996).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    136 A.D.3d 852 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 17, 2016

    In September 2005, Linton Brown executed a durable power of attorney naming his daughter Glenisha Brown as his attorney-in-fact as to certain matters. … Corp. v Tycoon Collections, Inc., 73 AD3d 719, 721 [2010]; Halstead v Dolphy, 70 AD3d 639, 639-640 [2010]).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Benoit v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission

    33 S.W.3d 663 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 2000

    Brown v. Hamilton Ins. Co., 956 S.W.2d 417, 419 (Mo.App.1997). … See Wilmer v. Board of County Comm’rs, 916 F.Supp. 1079, 1080-81 (D.Kan.1996); State Highway Admin, v. Kim, 358 Md. 313 , 726 A.2d 238, 246 (1999); Lienhard v.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    83 Cal. App. 74 · California Court of Appeal · May 12, 1927

    Brown. “Sarah M. Brown. “Approved by “Raglan Tuttle, “Attorney for Sarah M!. Brown. “Approved by “Prewett & Chamberlain, “Attorneys for George H. Brown.” … Brown, Plaintiff, v. George H.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    348 N.J. Super. 466 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 28, 2002

    Super. 466 Ellen BROWN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. James BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued September 20, 2001. Decided February 28, 2002. *465 Sheldon A. … In Lavene v.

    Declined to follow by In Re Marriage of Thornhill, 2008 Colo. App. LEXIS 1396 (2008)Cited 64 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    42 Del. 157 · Superior Court of Delaware · Oct 12, 1942

    Our own Court, in Addicks v. … Brown, now owns, either by original holding or by subsequent purchase, all of the capital stock of Brown & Kershaw, Incorporated.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    500 S.W.2d 210 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Aug 28, 1973

    Kesterson v. Kesterson, supra; Blevins v. Harris, ISO S.W. 2d 813 (Tex.Civ.App. Fort Worth 1941, no writ). As said by Chief Justice Calvert in Knollhoff v. … Neal v. Medcalf, supra; Taylor v. Taylor, 42 S.W.2d 455 (Tex.Civ.App. Waco 1931, no writ); Stevens v. Denton, 195 S.W,2d 796 (Tex.Civ.App. Waco 1946, no writ).

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    203 A.D. 658 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 29, 1922

    Brown, deceased. The respondents are the executors and trustees appointed therein. The appellant is the widow of the testator. … Brown.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    157 Ind. App. 672 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Sep 27, 1973

    In Northup v. Northup (1972), 154 Ind. … McDaniel v. McDaniel (1964), 245 Ind. 551, 562 , 201 N.E.2d 215 ; Dunn v. Deitschel (1930), 204 Ind. 269 , 169 N.E. 529 ; Hardiman v. Hardiman (1972), [152] Ind. App. [675], 284 N.E.2d 820 ; Mathews v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.