Case law

Commonwealth ex rel. Judicial Conduct Board v. Griffin

591 Pa. 351 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 26, 2007

V, §■ 18(a)(7) (setting forth the investigative tools of the Judicial Conduct Board); Art. Y, § 18(b)(5) (describing the functions of the Court of Judicial Discipline); Art. … Nothing in this opinion speaks to the authority of the Judicial Conduct Board to move forward with a complaint against Judge Griffin in its capacity as outlined in Pa. Const, art. V§ 18.

People v. Brown

102 N.E.3d 205 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 30, 2017

People v. Hughes, 2012 IL 112817, ¶ 44 (citing Missouri v. Frye, 566 U.S. 134, 140 (2012)). … See, e.g., Padilla v.

State v. Brown

2018 Ohio 5209 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 26, 2018

Ames 2304, LLC v. City of Ames, Zoning Board of Adjustment

924 N.W.2d 863 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Mar 8, 2019

See State v. … See Brakke v. Iowa Dep’t of Nat.

Ramey v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

997 A.2d 694 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 2010

In Ramey v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 950 A.2d 38 (D.C.2008) (Ramey I), we l’emanded the case for the CRB to reconsider its decision in light of our decision in McCamey v. … See Mayers v.

Lee v. Brown

232 N.J. 114 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 21, 2018

The Appellate Division, relying on Bombace v. … (quoting State v. Brown , 216 N.J. 508 , 545, 83 A.3d 45 (2014) ). The TCA effectuates the Legislature's intent to establish immunity for government action as the rule and liability as the exception.

C.C.H. v. Philadelphia Phillies, Inc.

596 Pa. 23 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 19, 2008

See Stokan v. … Dalrymple v. Brown, 549 Pa. 217 , 701 A.2d 164, 170 (1997).

State ex rel. Taggart v. Addison

78 Kan. 172 · Supreme Court of Kansas · May 9, 1908

(The State v. Addison, 76 Kan. 699 , 92 Pac. 581 .) That decision is the law of the case, but it remains for the court to determine issues of fact presented by the pleadings and evidence. … The determination of the appointing board or officer as to the qualifications of the applicant involves official discretion, and, when''made fairly and in good faith, is final.” (The State v.

Briggs v. Brown

221 Cal. Rptr. 3d 465 · California Supreme Court · Aug 24, 2017

(Raven v. Deukmejian (1990) 52 Cal.3d 336, 341, citing Brosnahan v. Brown (1982) 32 Cal.3d 236, 242 (Brosnahan), and Amador Valley Joint Union High Sch. Dist. v. … Skrupa (1963) 372 U.S. 726, 730; see Brown v.

In Re Estate of Davis

308 S.W.3d 832 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 23, 2010

Hunter v. Brown, 955 S.W.2d 49, 50-51 (Tenn. 1997); Cowden v. Sovran Bank/Cent. S., 816 S.W.2d 741, 744 (Tenn. 1991). … Calaway v. Schucker, 193 S.W.3d 509 (Tenn. 2005), and Penley v.

Levesque v. Hudson

106 N.H. 470 · Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Oct 29, 1965

Bouley v. Nashua, 106 N. H. 79; Fortuna v. Zoning Board of Manchester, 95 N. H. 211. … Bouley v. Nashua, supra. See Suprenant v. Nashua, 101 N. H. 43.

Kuhlman v. State

317 Ga. 232 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Sep 6, 2023

V (b) (1). … State v.

State v. Brown

236 N.J. 497 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 4, 2019

The panel, citing Giglio v. … State v. Hegel , 113 N.J. Super. 193 , 202, 273 A.2d 383 (App. Div. 1971) (quoting State v.

Polaris Sales, Inc. v. HERITAGE IMPORTS

879 So. 2d 1129 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 3, 2003

Cherry, Bekaert Holland v. Brown , 582 So.2d 502 , 506 (Ala. 1991). … SEE, BROWN, JOHNSTONE, HARWOOD, WOODALL, and STUART, JJ., concur.

State v. Brown

170 Idaho 439 · Idaho Supreme Court · Jan 6, 2022

State v. McIntosh, 160 Idaho 1, 6, 368 P.3d 621, 626 (2016). Generally, once a defendant is placed into actual physical custody of the Board of Corrections, the district court’s jurisdiction is extinguished. State v. … Next, if the district court orders a rider under section 19-2601(4), the district court retains jurisdiction of the defendant, which in essence means it shares “concurrent” jurisdiction with the Board. State v.

In Re the Personal Restraint of Myers

105 Wash. 2d 257 · Washington Supreme Court · Apr 7, 1986

Accordingly, we hold that Parole Board Rule 2.081 is invalid. See RCW 9.95.150; Baker v. Morris, supra. … V Because the Board has paroled Myers, a remand to the Board to recompute his sentence would serve no purpose.

In re D.S.

364 N.C. 184 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 17, 2010

Shelton v. Morehead Mem’l Hosp., 318 N.C. 76, 81-82 , 347 S.E.2d 824, 828 (1986) (citations omitted). Questions of statutory interpretation are questions of law and are reviewed de novo. E.g., Brown v.

Brown v. State

302 Ga. 454 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Oct 30, 2017

Appellant Ahmad Edward Brown challenges his convictions for malice murder and other crimes in connection with the shooting death of Deonta Moore. … See Linson v.

State v. Blackwell

661 So. 2d 282 · Supreme Court of Florida · Jul 20, 1995

We have for review the following decisions based on conflict with Ashley v. State, 614 So.2d 486 (Fla. 1993): Blackwell v. State, 638 So.2d 119 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Brown v. … V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We quash Blackwell, Brown, Holmes, Jones, and Thompson .

Commonwealth v. Brown

185 A.3d 316 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 1, 2018

The Superior Court affirmed Brown's judgment of sentence. Commonwealth v. Brown , 139 A.3d 208 (Pa. Super. 2016). … Commonwealth v. Brown , 139 A.3d 208 , 217 (Pa. Super. 2016), appeal granted , 640 Pa.533, 164 A.3d 461 (2016).