Case law

Brown v. State

95 Tex. Crim. 664 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 14, 1923

Hernandez v. State, 20 Texas Crim. App. 151; Porter v. State, 23 Texas Crim. App. 295; Rundell v. State, 90 Texas Crim. Rep., 410 . … Williams v. State, 12 Texas Crim. App. 397; Tallant v. State, 14 Texas Crim. App. 234; Peralto v. State, 17 Texas Crim. App. 571; Moore v. State, 74 Texas Crim. Rep., 66 , 166 S. W.

Brown v. Golightly

106 S.C. 519 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Mar 19, 1917

all of the evidence in the case and a careful examination of the same and all the circumstances in the case there is no evidence to sustain the finding of the Circuit Court; under the decisions of this Court in McAulay v. … McAulay , 96 S.C. 86 , 79 S.E. 785 ; Dicks v. Cassels , 100 S.C. 348 , 84 S.E. 878 , and Kerr v.

Geer v. . Brown

126 N.C. 238 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 27, 1900

Stanly v. Baird, 118 N. C., 75 . … And so in Saunders v. Earp, 118 N.

State v. Quartez Brown

300 Kan. 565 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Aug 15, 2014

State v. Hall, 292 Kan. 841, 859, 257 P.3d 272 (2011)." State v. Brown, 298 Kan. 1040, 1054, 318 P.3d 1005 (2014). … State v.

Wyckoff v. Brown

135 Kan. 467 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Jun 4, 1932

There are certain approved methods of shortening a record for appellate review (Seigle v. Soldiers’ Compensation Board, 119 Kan. 253, 254 , 237 Pac. 657 , and citations; Richards v. … (Holderman v. Hood, 78 Kan. 46 , syl. ¶ 1, 96 Pac. 71 ; Buckwalter v. Henrion, 111 Kan. 781 , 208 Pac. 645 ; Lambert v. Rhea, 134 Kan. 10 , 4 P. 2d 419 .)

State v. Brown

329 So. 2d 701 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Mar 29, 1976

This trial, conviction and sentence occurred in January, 1973, as a result of a bill of information filed in November, 1972, charging David Brown and Russell Eugene Wyman with armed robbery. … Defense counsel made no objection to the court’s ruling and continued questioning Brown on his schooling and employment.

Cannon v. Brown

142 Kan. 700 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Dec 7, 1935

In Coffman v. … (Holloway v. Telfer, 136 Kan. 80 , 12 P. 2d 826 .)” (p. 181.)

Brown v. State

512 A.2d 875 · Supreme Court of Rhode Island · Jul 30, 1986

The plaintiffs, Mary Brown and Kevin Brown, are before us on a consolidated appeal from the dismissal by a Superior Court trial justice of their respective petitions seeking compensation benefits from the Violent Crimes Indemnity … Lindsay v. Crohan, 508 A.2d 674 (R.I.1986); Greco v. Farago, 477 A.2d 98 (R.I.1984); Io rio v. Chin, 446 A.2d 1021 (R.I.1982); Cacchillo v. H. Leach Machinery Co., 111 R.I. 593 , 305 A.2d 541 (1973).

Brown v. Brittain

13 Brief Times Rptr. 598 · Supreme Court of Colorado · May 15, 1989

In Louisiana v. … See Green v.

Higman v. Brown

3 Ind. 430 · Indiana Supreme Court · Jun 14, 1852

Brown commenced an action of assumpsit in the Circuit Court against Higman for work and labor. The amount of damages claimed in the declaration was 500 dollars. Plea, the general issue. … Edmonds v. Paskins, 8 Blackf. 196. — Dayton v. Hall, id. 556. In the case now before us, the evidence is not set out; and we must presume that the facts proved were such as to authorize the judgment. Per Curiam .

Kenney v. Brown

139 Mass. 345 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · May 8, 1885

The cases of Elwell v. Cumner, 136 Mass. 102 , and Bigelow v. Norris, ante, 12, are decisive of the case at bar. Exceptions overruled.

Brown v. State

67 Tex. Crim. 543 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 16, 1912

Brown’s. … As was said in the recent case of Moore v.

People State v. Brown

98 N.E.3d 39 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 30, 2018

People State v. Brown

98 N.E.3d 65 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 30, 2018

People v. Brown

62 Cal. 2d 901 · California Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1965

In People v. Fields, ante, p. 538 [ 42 Cal.Rptr. 833 , 399 P.2d 369 ], filed this day, it is concluded that such an order is a final judgment in a special proceeding, and for that reason appealable. (Code Civ.

Brown v. Heller

30 N.M. 1 · New Mexico Supreme Court · May 9, 1924

Brown. … Morgan v. Doughton, 24 N. M. 274, 171 Pac. 503 ; Beals v. Ares, 25 N. M. 459, 185 Pac. 780 ; Board of Education v. O’Bannon, 26 N. M. 606, 195 Pac. 801 .

Brown v. Wright

17 Vt. 97 · Supreme Court of Vermont · Mar 15, 1843

Such a doctrine was promulgated in Powell v. Brown, 1 Tyler 236 , and in Parker v. Bixby et al., 2 Tyler 466 . … In Spear v.

Desmond v. Brown

29 Iowa 53 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jun 15, 1870

In McClintock v. Crick, 4 Iowa, 453 , it is explicitly laid down, that it is not necessary to prove the precise words as averred in the. petition, but it is sufficient to prove them substantially as therein set out. … In addition to the authorities cited in support of the rule in McClintock v. Crick, the following are to the same effect: Kennedy v. Lowry, 1 Binn. 393 ; Miller v. Miller, 8 Johns. 74 ; Grubbs v. Kyzer, 2 McCord, 304 .

Brown v. State

259 Ark. 449 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 8, 1976

Jones v. State, 246 Ark. 1057 , 441 S.W. 2d 458 (i969), and other cases therein cited. Brown contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for severance. … In Spence v.

Commonwealth v. Brown

394 Mass. 394 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Apr 2, 1985

Commonwealth v. Martinez, 384 Mass. 377, 380-381 (1981). Commonwealth v. Joyce, 382 Mass. 222, 229 (1981). Commonwealth v. Redmond, 357 Mass. 333, 338 (1970). … Commonwealth v. Ahearn, supra. He merely refused to allow Brown to place before the jury evidence that was irrelevant in the form offered. In doing so, the judge committed no error. Commonwealth v.