Case law

Brown v. Pollard

89 Va. 696 · Supreme Court of Virginia · Mar 9, 1893

Boone on the Law of Real Property, sec. 380 ; Code of Va. 1887, sec. 2840 ; Dunsmore v. Lyle, 87 Va. 393 . … See 1 Chitty on Contracts, p.422; 2 Minor, p. 858; Jackson v. Cartright, 5 Munf. 318 ; Anthony v. Leftwich, 3 Rand. 255 ; 2 Lomax Dig. 54. In Scott v. Bush, 26 Michigan 418, (12 Amer.

State v. Brown

355 Md. 89 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jul 28, 1999

Brown v. State, 124 Md.App. 245, 247 , 721 A.2d 269, 270 (1998). We shall reverse the judgment of the intermediate appellate court. I. … Brown, 124 Md.App. at 247 , 721 A.2d at 270 .

Brown v. People

159 Colo. 17 · Supreme Court of Colorado · Jan 10, 1966

With the aid of assigned counsel, Brown brought writ of error and that judgment was reversed and the case remanded for a new trial. Brown v. People, 130 Colo. 77 , 273 P.2d 128 . … Brown’s contention here is that the matters alleged in his 35 (b) petition, if true, entitled him to relief under Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 , 84 Sup. Ct. 1758, 12 L. Ed.2d 977 . In Ruark v.

Brown v. State

474 S.W.3d 498 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 19, 2015

Brown lodged an appeal in this court. After the State alleged that the petition had not been properly verified, this court remanded the matter for findings of fact. Brown v. … Brown v. State, 2015 Ark. 311 (per curiam) (“Brown III”).

Brown v. State

128 Tex. Crim. 321 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 13, 1935

Appellant’s sister, Flora Brown, testified substantially to the same facts as the appellant except -that she was unable to state the color of the fan.

Brown v. Carter

52 Mo. 46 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 15, 1873

Collas v. Brown

211 Ala. 443 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 12, 1924

In Howard v. … See authorities, supra; Whitehead v. Dane, 72 Ala. 39 ; Jones v. Trawick’s Adm’r, 31 Ala. 253 ; Main v. Radney (Ala.) 39 South. 981 ; -Hall’s Appeal, 60 Pa. 458 , 100 Am. Dec. 584 ; 22 C. J. 1097-1120.

State v. Brown

191 A.2d 353 · Supreme Court of Rhode Island · Jun 3, 1963

191 A.2d 353 (1963) STATE v. Vincent R. BROWN. Ex. No. 10363. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. June 3, 1963. *354 J. Joseph Nugent, Atty. Gen., Corinne P. Grande, Sp. Counsel, for State. … In support of his motion, defendant contends that we overlooked the holding of this court in Renault v. John Hancock Mutual Life Ins.

Brown v. Hogan

49 Neb. 746 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1896

(Manker v. Sine, 35 Neb., 746 ; Garber v. Palmer, 47 Neb., 699 .) … (Gillespie v. Brown, 16 Neb., 457 ; Blue Valley Bank v. Bane, 20 Neb., 295 ; Kay v. Noll, 20 Neb., 380 ; Fischer v. Burchall, 27 Neb., 245 ; Shackleford v. Hargreaves, 42 Neb., 680 ; Kilpatrick-Koch Dry Goods Co. v.

People v. Brown

16 Brief Times Rptr. 1895 · Supreme Court of Colorado · Dec 1, 1992

V The hearing panel approved the board’s recommendation that the respondent receive a public censure. The assistant disciplinary counsel has not excepted to that recommendation. … Co. v.

Brown v. Cartwright

163 Mont. 139 · Montana Supreme Court · Nov 7, 1973

In Magelssen v. … Lamme v. Dodson, 4 Mont. 560, 591 , 2 P. 298 , 303 (1883); Stetson v.

Chambers v. Brown

69 Iowa 213 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jun 18, 1886

Brown. *215 “P. S. Another lease will be made on my other adjoining lands on the some basis, should Mr. … 61* V. The court directed the jury to consider the opinion of witnesses touching the value of plaintiff’s right.

Fisher v. Brown

1 Tyl. 387 · Supreme Court of Vermont · Jan 15, 1802

The doctrine laid down by Eyre, Chief Justice, in the case of De Symons v.

Brown v. Kalene

230 Iowa 76 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Mar 18, 1941

From this order Mary Brown and Margaret Pelzer appeal. … Appellants cite Brown v. Knapp, 79 N. Y. 136 ; and Oliver v. Wells, 254 N. Y. 451 , 173 N. E. 676 , and see cases cited therein. See, also, Grindem v. Grindem, 89 Iowa 295, 297 , 56 N. W. 505, 506 ; Moran v.

Brown v. Dorfman

251 Or. 522 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 8, 1968

See Trotter v. Town of Stayton, 45 Or 301 , 77 P 395 (1904); Starr v. Stark, 7 Or 500 (1879). … See McElwain v. Georgia-Pacific, 245 Or 247 , 421 P2d 957 (1966); Williams v. Goose Lake Valley Irr. Co., 83 Or 302, 310 , 163 P 81 (1917).

Perkins v. Brown

158 Fla. 21 · Supreme Court of Florida · Oct 8, 1946

Elsie Perkins Brown” Mrs. Elsie Perkins Brown obtained a decree of divorce from R. H. Brown on December 9, 1939. … J., BROWN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Brown v. Collins

53 N.H. 442 · Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Jun 15, 1873

And upon authority, this we thinl; n f.,¡ fished to be the law, whether the things so brought be board 5 -ft,.,]or, or filth, or stenches. … In Brown v. Kendall, 6 Cush. 292 , the defendant, having interfered to part his dog and the plaintiff’s which were fighting, in raising a stick for that purpose, accidentally struck the plaintiff, and injured him.

Olney v. Brown

163 Mich. 125 · Michigan Supreme Court · Nov 11, 1910

Rice, 1 Gray (Mass.), 587 ; Bigelow v. Poole, 10 Gray (Mass.), 104 ; Ashley, Appellant, 4 Pick. (Mass.) 24; Osgood v. Breed, 17 Mass. 358 ; Bullard v. Bullard, 5 Pick. (Mass.) 527; Bulkeley v. Noble, 2 Pick. … (Mass.) 340; Porter v. Porter, 51 Me. 376 ; Weatherhead v. Field, 26 Vt. 665 ; Adams v. Adams, 22 Vt. 51; Newell v. Newell, 13 Vt. 24 . We must hold that these loans were not advancements.

Peeples v. Brown

42 S.C. 81 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Jul 27, 1894

That while so engaged as aforesaid, and while plaintiff’s wagons were loaded with said furniture, and quietly driving along the public highway, the defendant, Jennie Brown, wilfully, wrongfully, unlawfully, and maliciously … See Levi & Legg v. Bell, 23 S. C., at page 285. The judgment of this court is, that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.

Brown v. Slauson

23 Wis. 244 · Wisconsin Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1868

Brown one-quarter of the vessel, she paying what she could down, and the balance to be paid out of the earnings; the husband to sail the vessel until she was paid for. … Brown a one-quarter interest upon the conditions named. But, upon the facts of this case, that agreement cannot be enforced. It is strictly within the statute of frauds.