Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersS

10,000+ results

2.30s

  • Hanson v. Brown

    139 Ark. 60 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 26, 1919

    Gh Brown, created the necessity by bringing an action for the lands. Hargis v. Edrington, 113 Ark. 433 . To the same effect see Waters v. Travis, 9 Johnson’s Rept. (N. Y.) 448; Norman v. Bennett (W. V.), 9 S. … E. 914 ; Coffey v. Emigh (Col.), 10 L. R. A. 125; Mudgett v. Clay (Wash.), 31 Pac. 424 , and Western Railroad Corporation v. Babcock, 6 Mete. (Mass.) 346.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Mullinnix v. Brown

    151 Iowa 468 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jun 8, 1911

    See, as sustaining these views, Spurgin v. Bowers, 82 Iowa, 187 ; Myers v. Davis, 47 Iowa, 325 ; Mullin v. White, 134 Iowa, 681 ; Wescott v. Sioux City, 141 Iowa, 459 . *474 4‘ tionfaEate'ment of sale. *473 II. … In Thomas v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Jackson

    179 N.C. 363 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 31, 1920

    Brown, J. … R. v. Spencer, 166 N. C., 522 .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Collas v. Brown

    211 Ala. 443 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 12, 1924

    In Howard v. … See authorities, supra; Whitehead v. Dane, 72 Ala. 39 ; Jones v. Trawick’s Adm’r, 31 Ala. 253 ; Main v. Radney (Ala.) 39 South. 981 ; -Hall’s Appeal, 60 Pa. 458 , 100 Am. Dec. 584 ; 22 C. J. 1097-1120.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Walker v. Brown

    30 Tenn. 179 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1850

    This is an action of trespass brought by Brown against Walker for whipping the slave of the plaintiff. The defendant pleaded 1st.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hartley v. Brown

    46 Cal. 201 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1873

    (Estrada v. Murphy, 19 Cal. 272; Clark v. Lockwood, 21 Cal. 222 ; Emeric v. Penniman, 26 Cal. 119; O’Connell v. Dougherty, 32 Cal. 462 ; Schmitt v. Giovanari, 43 Cal. 617 .) In Emeric v. … In O’Connell v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    130 Tex. Crim. 276 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 29, 1936

    In the case of Norris v. … Valigura v. State, 150 S. *280 W., 778; Harris v. State, 76 Texas Crim. Rep., 155 , 172 S. W., 1146 Sherwood v. State, 225 S. W., 1101 ; Presley v. State, 60 Texas Crim. Rep., 102 (105).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • McQueen v. Brown

    175 N.J. 200 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 10, 2002

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    123 So. 3d 164 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Sep 20, 2013

    In re Brown, Eric R.; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. 5, No. 285,217; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 48,-110-KW. Denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Harness

    16 Ind. 248 · Indiana Supreme Court · Jun 5, 1861

    Harness sued Brown, as the joint maker of a note. Brown answered that he was surety only, and that he was not indebted. Second. That he had notified Harness to sue the principal. Third. Usury. … At the first term of the Court afterward, Brown filed a petition for a review of said judgment, averring the above facts, and, in addition, that the only evidence given on the trial was the note sued on; that said defense

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Dady v. Brown

    76 Iowa 528 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jan 18, 1889

    The petition alleges that the defendant Brown brought an. action, against plaintiff and and another, before a justice of the peace, in which a trial was had to a jury, and a verdict rendered against plaintiff ’ s co-defendant

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Chaney

    256 Mo. 219 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 24, 1914

    In Mangold v. … Brown and Faris, JJ., concur.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    120 So. 3d 704 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Sep 13, 2013

    In re Brown, David;—Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of West Feliciana, 20th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. W-04-3-77; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2013 KW 1109.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Dorfman

    251 Or. 522 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 8, 1968

    See Trotter v. Town of Stayton, 45 Or 301 , 77 P 395 (1904); Starr v. Stark, 7 Or 500 (1879). … See McElwain v. Georgia-Pacific, 245 Or 247 , 421 P2d 957 (1966); Williams v. Goose Lake Valley Irr. Co., 83 Or 302, 310 , 163 P 81 (1917).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Perkins v. Brown

    158 Fla. 21 · Supreme Court of Florida · Oct 8, 1946

    Elsie Perkins Brown” Mrs. Elsie Perkins Brown obtained a decree of divorce from R. H. Brown on December 9, 1939. … J., BROWN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Paasch v. Brown

    199 Neb. 683 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1977

    In the second appearance of this contro *685 versy before this court, Paasch v. Brown, 193 Neb. 368 , 227 N. … Paasch v. Brown, 190 Neb. at 425 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Turpin

    229 Ky. 383 · Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · May 7, 1929

    Brown, and Charles M. Brown and Sam Brown as sureties, to recover on a note for $1,750. In the first paragraph of the answer the defendants pleaded a counterclaim of $1,200 for board and lodging furnished plaintiff. … Brown that she and hex-husband would pay for their board, while there, and help furxxish their part of expenses.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    2015 Ark. 311 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 23, 2015

    V. … Brown v. State, 2015 Ark. 97.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    744 A.2d 831 · Supreme Court of Rhode Island · Jan 21, 2000

    Brown, 549 A.2d 1373, 1376 (R.I.1988) (quoting State v. Cianci, 430 A.2d 756, 765 (R.I.1981)). In State v. … Brown, 549 A.2d at 1376 . This Court has declared that merely objecting by a number to the jury charge is insufficient to preserve the issue for appellate review. State v. DeCiantis, 501 A.2d 365, 369 (R.I. 1985).

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Byers

    118 Kan. 503 · Supreme Court of Kansas · May 9, 1925

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.