Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
4.58s
142 Tenn. 304 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1919
Ainsworth v. Mt. Moriah Lodge, 172 Mass., 261 , 52 N. E., 81 ; Chamberlain v . Godfrey’s Adm’r 50 Ala., 530 ; McMillan v. Solomon, 42 Ala., 364 , 94 Am. Dec., 654 ; Waite v. O’Neil, 76 Fed., 408 , 22 C. C. … See in accord Humiston, Keeling & Co. v. Wheeler, 175 Ill., 514 , 51 N. E., 893 ; Conn. Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. U. S., 21 Ct. Cl., 195 ; Nonotuck Silk Co. v. Shay, 37 Ill. App., 542 .
Cited 7 timesPublished201 Mass. 261 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 26, 1909
Cited 5 timesPublished619 S.W.2d 68 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 14, 1981
The original opinion filed by the Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District, Brown v. State, 607 S.W.2d 801 (Mo.App.1980), is approved and affirmed and by reference made a part of this opinion. Sours v. … See Brown v. State, 607 S.W.2d 801 (Mo.App.1980); State v. Collins, 607 S.W.2d 781 (Mo.App.1980); State v. Hawkins, 608 S.W.2d 496 (Mo.App.1980); State v. (Eddie) Greer, 609 S.W.2d 423 (Mo.App.1980); State v.
Cited 6 timesPublished79 Tex. 157 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1890
Giddings conveyed to appellant Brown in 1856. Each of these conveyances was properly recorded. The remaining two-thirds of the land was conveyed to defendants Adams 'and Wickes in 1872. … Appellants had paid taxes thereon for several years, and defendant Brown had at one time leased the land. . One of the subscribing witnesses, Estevan de la Garza, testified that he knew the plaintiff and A.
Cited 3 timesPublished159 Pa. 121 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 1893
In Reynolds v. … Brown the property did not belong to him or become any part of his estate.
Cited 8 timesPublished130 So. 3d 339 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jan 17, 2014
In re Brown, Rannell; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. J, No. 06-05-0833; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2013 KW 0071.
Cited 0 timesPublished64 Or. 473 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1913
for reward or hire shall do any act of dentistry, without having filed for record and having recorded in the office of the county recorder of the county wherein he shall so practice or do such act a certificate from said board … State v. Carr, 6 Or. 133 ; State v. Miller, 54 Or. 381 ( 103 Pac. 519 ). 2, 3. It is claimed that Section 4780, L. O.
Cited 2 timesPublished257 Ark. 252 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 18, 1974
Brown, et ux, v. Harold Chakalas, M.I). The trial court granted defendant’s subsequent motion to strike the previous order of enrollment. … Brown, Jones and Byrd, JJ., dissent.
Cited 7 timesPublished21 Nev. 437 · Nevada Supreme Court · Jul 5, 1893
The principal question presented by the record in this ease is the same as decided by this court in Nickals v. Winn, 17 Nev. 192 , and Gonder v. Miller, 21 Nev. 180 . … (Reinhart v. Bradshaw, 19 Nev. 258 .)
Cited 8 timesPublished627 A.2d 521 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 30, 1993
alleged negligence of the Browns. … Mockus v. Melanson, 615 A.2d 245, 247 (Me.1992).
Cited 8 timesPublished165 Tex. Crim. 388 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 18, 1957
Stone v. State, 89 Texas Cr. Rep. 416 , 232 S.W. 818 ; Sayles v. State, 101 Texas Cr. Rep. 333 , 275 S.W. 831 ; Bell v. State, 160 Texas Cr. Rep. 538 , 272 S.W. 2d 888 and Williams v. State, 161 Texas Cr.
Cited 1 timesPublished593 P.2d 247 · Alaska Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1979
Brown v. Cook Inlet Region, Inc., 569 P.2d 1321 (Alaska 1977). Ward’s second proxy solicitation began with a cartoon depicting a crowd of Cook Inlet shareholders telling management, “Hey! We want our money NOW.” … Industries, Inc. v.
Cited 13 timesPublished290 Ga. 477 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Feb 6, 2012
See, e.g., Johnson v. … See, e.g., Gould v.
Cited 3 timesPublished58 N.M. 153 · New Mexico Supreme Court · Feb 16, 1954
Brown and Gurley would have us revive the doctrine of State ex rel. McFann v. … Ross v. Daniel and Werner v. Garcia, supra.
Cited 6 timesPublished37 Wash. 106 · Washington Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1905
Smith v. Board of Dental Examiners, 31 Wash. 492 , 72 Pac. 110 ; In re Thompson, 36 Wash. 377 , 78 Pac. 899 . … be found in some appropriate proceeding to review the conduct of the board.”
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna