Case law

Brown v. Mitchell

119 So. 2d 385 · Supreme Court of Florida · Mar 2, 1960

Brown, Fla.App.1959, 114 So.2d 178 , which apparently conflicted with a decision of this court in Grimsley v. Rosenberg, 94 Fla. 673 , 114 So. 553 , dealing with the same point of law. Sec. 4, Art. … V of the Constitution as amended 6 November 1956, F.S.A. The petitioner, Georgia Olena Brown, filed in the circuit court a suit to establish a constructive trust in certain real property. It was alleged that L. L.

Brown v. State

277 Ga. 623 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Mar 1, 2004

This evidence was sufficient to enable a reasonable trier of fact to find beyond a reasonable doubt that Brown was guilty of murder as a party to the crime. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. … The appeal was docketed September 24, 2003 and was submitted for decision on the briefs. 2 We note that Brown could not have been tried for conspiracy since the object of the conspiracy was completed. See Kilgore v.

Brown v. Bishop

105 Me. 272 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 9, 1909

Brown (ls) in presence of R. W. Brown, J. C. Bishop (ls)” *275 The specified consideration of $350 was paid within the time provided therefor. … Pease v. Gibson, 6 Maine, 81; Pierce v. Banton, 98 Maine, 553; Emerson v. Shores, 95 Maine, 237; Banton v. Shorey, 77 Maine, 48; Claflin v. Carpenter, 4 Met. 580 ; Drake v. Wells, 11 Allen, 141 ; White v.

Brown v. Dean

52 Mich. 267 · Michigan Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1883

Hedstrom v. Kingsbury 40 Mich. 637 ; Frankel v. Coots 41 Mich. 77 . … Darling v. Hurst 39 Mich. 768 ; Brigham v. Fawcett 42 Mich. 542 ; Pogodzinski v. Kruger 44 Mich. 79 . The defendants’ fourth, fifth, and tenth requests were proper to be given to the jury.

Brown v. Hughes

94 S.C. 140 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Mar 25, 1913

State v. Powell, 91 S. C. 5, 73 S. E. 1017 ; Matthews v. Industrial Lum. Co., 91 S. C. 568, 75 S. E. 171 . There is such testimony here. Plaintiff had the oldest mortgage over Hughes’ crop. … There is no- doubt but that the cotton delivered to Nimmons was- part of the cotton raised by Hughes on the Hopkins place and covered by the mortgage- of Brown. It was held in Bingham v. Harby, 91 S. C. 121, 74 S.

Brown v. Williams

135 Ohio St. 3d 1468 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 19, 2013

Stahl v. Brown

72 Iowa 720 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Mar 5, 1887

Haynes v. Harris, 33 Iowa, 516 ; Phinney v. Warren, 52 Id., 333.

Brown v. State

94 Nev. 393 · Nevada Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1978

Here, however, Brown was charged for his own independent activity, and the undercover officer was not a material witness. Cf. Jones v. State, 93 Nev. 178 , 564 P.2d 605 (1977). … Brown cites Smith v. Illinois, 390 U.S. 129 (1968) and Alford v. United States, 282 U.S. 687 (1931), for the proposition that a defendant is entitled to know the address of a prosecution witness.

Brown v. Hartford

173 Mo. 183 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 18, 1903

In the cases of Leeper v. Baker, 68 Mo. 400 , and Mississippi County v. … This case is cited and followed in Ward v. Ihler, 132 Mo. l. c. 382; Hedges v. Pollard, 149 Mo. l. c. 225, and Brummell v. Harris, 162 Mo. l. c. 405. The same rule was reannounced in Herbst v.

State v. Brown

110 La. 591 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · May 11, 1903

Brown v. D. E. Brown, Jr.,” by feloniously, willfully, falsely, and corruptly testifying and swearing, after having been sworn as aforesaid, in substance, “that he, the said E. Brown, did not, on the day D. E. … State v. Meekins, 41 La. Ann. 543 , 6 South. 822 .

State v. Brown

391 S.W.2d 903 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 14, 1965

State v. Vollmar, Mo.Sup., 389 S.W.2d 20 [7]. … In support of his contention defendant relies on Chapman v. United States, 365 U.S. 610 , 81 S.Ct. 776 , 5 L.Ed.2d 828 , and United States v. Jeffers, 342 U.S. 48 , 72 S.Ct. 93 , 96 L.Ed. 59 .

Brown v. Jonz

572 A.2d 455 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 1990

See Kowalak v. … See Cannon v.

Brown v. State

83 Tex. Crim. 451 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 22, 1918

C., p. 132; Eldridge v. State, 12 Texas Crim. App., 208 ; Livar v. State, 26 Texas Crim. App., 115; Harris v. State, 67 Texas Crim. Rep., 251 , 148 S. W. Rep., 1074 . … Moore v. State, 7 Texas Crim. App., 14; Edgar v. State, 59 Texas Crim. Rep., 252 ; James v. State, 63 Texas Crim. Rep., 75 .

People v. Brown

86 N.Y.2d 728 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 1995

One of the officers pursued that person, who was wearing a brown sheepskin jacket and black baseball hat, on foot and followed him into an apartment building. … Dixon, 85 NY2d, at 223-224 , supra; People v Wharton, 74 NY2d 921, 922 ; People v Gissendanner, 48 NY2d 543, 552 ).

Gehm v. Brown

125 Colo. 555 · Supreme Court of Colorado · Jun 2, 1952

In Wunderlich v. … People ex rel. v. Newer, 125 Colo. 303 , 242 P. (2d) 615 . It was held in Daniel v.

Brown v. Spiegel

156 Mich. 138 · Michigan Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1909

Weeks on Attorneys (2d Ed.), § 217; Fairbanks v. Stanley, 18 Me. 296 ; Kirksey v. Jones, 7 Ala. 622 . … Gardner v. Lloyd, 110 Pa. 278 ; Acme Manfg. Co. v. Reed, 197 Pa. 359 ; Davis Sewing Machine Co. v. Richards, 115, U. S. 524; 14 Am. & Eng. Enc. Law (2d Ed.), p. 1147, and cases cited.

Brown v. State

236 Ala. 426 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 16, 1938

Drennen Motor Co. v. Patrick, 225 Ala. 36 , 141 So. 681 ; Lee v. Diamond, 234 Ala. 175 , 174 So. 309 . … Though these questions are not presented for review, we gave attention to them in the rape case, Brown v.

Church v. Brown

195 Iowa 1112 · Supreme Court of Iowa · May 8, 1923

Bank v. Koechel, 8 S. D. 391 ( 66 N. … Bank v. Chicago, M. & St. P. R. Co., 114 Iowa 621, 623 ; Andregg v. Brunskill, 87 Iowa 351, 354 ; Chipman v. Weiny, 112 Iowa 702, 705 ; State Bank v. Felt, 99 Iowa 532, 534 ; Kenyon v.

Brown v. Gilmore

92 Pa. 40 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 5, 1880

In Hines v. … But in Leon v. Galceran, 11 Wall. 188 , it was held that the state courts have jurisdiction in an action in personam.

Brown v. Howard

43 R.I. 571 · Supreme Court of Rhode Island · Jun 22, 1921

See State v. Vanasse, 42 R. I. 278; State v. Babcock, 25 R. I. 224; State v. Ellwood, 17 R. I. 763. Max Levy, Waterman & Greenlaw, for plaintiff. Moore & Curry, Sheffield & Harvey, for defendant.