Case law

Sullivan v. Brown

225 Minn. 524 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Mar 5, 1948

Vincent de Paul v. Brannan, 97 Minn. 349, 351 , 107 N. … In Bird v. Johnson, 199 Minn. 252, 254 , 272 N.

People v. Brown

78 N.Y.2d 874 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 4, 1991

Brown v. Sikes

188 S.C. 288 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Sep 27, 1938

State v. Brown, 154 S. C., 55, 151 S. E., 218 . The Court will ascertain the intent of the Legislature, and “give it effect so far as possible within constitutional limitations.” Gregg Dyeing Co. v. Query, 166 S. … Winn v. Harby, 166 S. C., 99, 164 S. E., 434 . *292 The “Court must ascertain Legislature’s meaning from words used in statute and from subject-matter.”' Lytle v. Southern Ry., 171 S. C., 221, 171 S. E., 42 , 90 A. L.

State v. Brown

134 So. 3d 1177 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Feb 28, 2014

In re Brown, David; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of West Feliciana, 20th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. W-04-3-77; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2013 KW1685.

Reninger v. State Dept. of Corrections

951 P.2d 782 · Washington Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1998

Thompson Cohen, Plaintiff, v. … In Devine v.

Jackson v. Brown

275 Utah Adv. Rep. 18 · Utah Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1995

Brown moved to dismiss the claims as obsolete and anomalous. The trial court denied his motion because this court has previously recognized breach of promise to marry as a valid cause of action. See, e.g., Wilsted v. … See, e.g., Norton v. Macfarlane, 818 P.2d 8, 16-17 (Utah 1991) (abolishing action for criminal conversation); Hackford v.

State v. Brown

846 So. 2d 715 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · May 20, 2003

State v. Brown, XXXX-XXXXX(La. App. 2 Cir. 6/12/02), 825 So.2d 596 . Upon the state's application, we granted certiorari to review the correctness of that decision. … State v. Brown, 35,641 (La.App. 2 Cir. 6/12/02), 825 So.2d 596 (unpub'd).

Morris v. Brown

115 Conn. 389 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Jul 26, 1932

Porter v. Orient Ins. Co., 72 Conn. 519, 530 , 45 Atl. 7 ; United States Wood Preserving Co. v. Lawrence, 89 Conn. 633 , 95 Atl. 8 .

Brown v. Ransey

74 Ga. 210 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jan 6, 1885

Brown, at a valuation of some $7,000. … Brown, leaving her husband surviving, passed to her children.” 1.

Brown v. Buckley

86 Neb. 572 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1910

The village board granted the license. Demonstrator appealed to the district court for Custer county, 'which court on May 13, 1908', confirmed the action of the village board, and dismissed remonstrator’s action. … Following the rule announced in Heesch v. Snyder, 85 Neb. 778 , and in harmony with the authorities there cited, remonstrator’s appeal is Dismissed.

Brown v. Crawford

296 Ky. 249 · Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · Nov 30, 1943

Reed v. Ford, 129 Ky. 471 , 112 S. W. 600 , 19 L. R. A., N. S. 225; Morgan v. Hightower’s Adm’r, 291 Ky. 58 , 163 S. W. (2d) 21 . … The question of admissibility of such evidence in a case like this was decided adversely to appellant’s contention in Brown v. Simpson, 293 Ky. 755 , 170 S. W. (2d) 345 .

Pinney v. Brown

60 Conn. 164 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Mar 20, 1891

Brown 2070 votes. … Brown, seconded by Mr. *167 Carmody, Frederick J. Brown was appointed town agent, Mr. Pinney refusing to vote.

Brown v. Snell

46 Me. 490 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1859

Bullard v. Hinckley, 8 Greenl., 289; Russell v. Dudley, 3 Met., 147 . It remains to be seen whether, if the mortgage be regarded as outstanding, this bill can be maintained. By R. … J., in Shaw v. Gray, 23 Maine, 174, “ the power delegated must have reference to the modes of proceeding particularly prescribed for the purpose.” French v. Sturtevant, 8 Greenl. 246; Chase v.

Brown v. Doby

242 N.C. 462 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 30, 1955

Simmons v. Simmons, 228 N.C. 233 , 45 S.E. 2d 124 ; Bethell v. Lee, 200 N.C. 755 , 158 S.E. 493 . See also McLean v. McLean, 233 N.C. 139 , 63 S.E. 2d 138 . … See Smith v. Smith, 226 N.C. 506 , 39 S.E. 2d 391 ; Hall v. *466 Coach Co., 224 N.C. 781 , 32 S.E. 2d 325 ; In re Sams, 236 N.C. 228 , 72 S.E. 2d 421 ; Vestal v. Vending Machine Exchange, 219 N.C. 468 , 14 S.E. 2d 427 .

Henshaw v. Brown

299 Mass. 136 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Dec 28, 1937

Coleman Brown, Jr. but were against the estate of the deceased, E. Coleman Brown. … In Parker v.

Brown v. Horrigan

135 Ohio St. 3d 1456 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 4, 2013

Brown v. Curtin

330 Mo. 1156 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 5, 1932

They did not know anything about the Brown note or the alleged joint adventure with Curtin. … Manning v. Smith, 188 Mo. 167, 180 , 86 S. W. 867, 870 ; Albers Com. Co. v. Spencer, 245 Mo. 368, 375 , 150 S. W. 712, 713 ; Joplin Gas Co. v. Joplin, 182 Mo. App. 422, 432 , 167 S. W. 660, 662 .]

Brown v. State

201 Tenn. 50 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1956

The plaintiff-in-error hereinafter referred to as the defendant, James Albert Brown, was convicted for involuntary manslaughter and his punishment fixed at 11 months and 29 days in the County Jail. … In this connection see also Bradam v. State, 191 Tenn. 626 , 235 S.W.2d 801 ; and Smith v. State, 196 Tenn, 168, 264 S.W.2d 803 .

Ordway v. Commonwealth

391 S.W.3d 762 · Kentucky Supreme Court · Feb 21, 2013

As noted in Brown v. Commonwealth, 313 S.W.3d 577, 595 (Ky.2010), “preserved evi-dentiary and other non-constitutional errors will be deemed harmless under RCr 9.24 and Kotteakos v. … Brown v. Commonwealth, 313 S.W.3d 577 (Ky.2010); State v. Singh, 259 Conn. 693 , 793 A.2d 226 (2002).

Brown v. State

587 N.E.2d 111 · Indiana Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1992

Smith v. State (1989), Ind., 547 N.E.2d 817 . We also have held that to admit facts that indicate a witness has taken a polygraph test is error. Conn v. State (1989), Ind., 535 N.E.2d 1176 . … Appellant cites Neal v. State (1988), Ind., 522 N.E.2d 912 and Hall v.