Case law

Brown v. Tuschoff

235 Mo. 449 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 20, 1911

[Krechter v. Grofe, 166 Mo. 385 ; Clotilde v. Lutz, 157 Mo. 439 ; Davis v. Davis, 8 Mo. 56 .] … [Roberts v. Crume, 173 Mo. 579 ; Fanning v. Doan, 128 Mo. 323 ; Maguire v. Moore, 108 Mo. 273 ; Chew v. Keller, 100 Mo. 369 ; Waddell v. Waddell, 99 Mo. 345 .]

State v. Brown

370 So. 2d 528 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Apr 9, 1979

Brown v. State

480 N.E.2d 938 · Indiana Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1985

Cox v. State, (1985) Ind., 475 N.E.2d 664 ; Connell v. State, (1984) Ind., 470 N.E.2d 701 ; Goodloe v. State, (1982) Ind., 442 N.E.2d 346 . … Larry v. State, (1985) Ind., 477 N.E.2d 94 ; Hill v. State, (1981) Ind., 424 N.E.2d 999 , reh. denied.

Brown v. Ulrich

48 Neb. 409 · Nebraska Supreme Court · May 6, 1896

In Morgan v. … Co. v.

Brown v. Hunt

11 Mass. 45 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 15, 1814

Brown v. Merrill

107 Cal. 446 · California Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1895

This contention is based upon the authority of Bailey v.

Everett v. Brown

174 W. Va. 35 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1984

In the case before us the controlling law in this State may be found in Ross v. … Brown v. Western Maryland Railway Co., 84 W.Va. 271 , 99 S.E. 457 , 4 A.L.R. 522 ; 25 R.C.L., Statute of Frauds, Section 343. Applying Ross’ principles, Mr. and Mrs.

Brown v. Guthrie

185 Ind. 669 · Indiana Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1916

Smith v. Board (1909), 173 Ind. 364 , and cases cited on page 377, 90 N. E. 881 . The court committed no error in its ruling on the demurrer to the first paragraph of complaint. … Ray v. Baker (1905), 165 Ind. 74, 83 , 74 N. E. 619 ; Hatfield v. Rooker (1913), 56 Ind. App. 1, 6 , 104 N. E. 798 ; Tuell v. Homann (1915), 60 Ind. App. 285, 291 , 108 N. E. 596 . 5.

Arrott v. Brown

6 Whart. 9 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1840

In Harvey v. … Such is the principle of Harvey v.

Brown v. Webb

60 Or. 526 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1912

Johnson v. Okerstrom, 70 Minn. 303, 308 ( 73 N. W. 147 ); Leavengood v. McGee, 50 Or. 233 ( 91 Pac. 453 ). Officers of Bank of Manchester v. Allen, 11 Vt. 303 , 306; 3 Enc. of Ev., p. 614; Methodist Church v. … Leavengood v. McGee, 50 Or. 283 ( 91 Pac. 453 ). See, also, Trustees v. Froislie, 37 Minn. 447 ( 35 N. W. 260 ); Society Perun v. Cleveland, 43 Ohio St. 481 ( 3 N. E. 357 ); Methodist Church v. Picket, 23 Barb. (N.

Brown v. Mooney

108 Ga. 331 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jul 22, 1899

Griffin v. Griffin, 33 Ga. 109 ; Hamby Mountain Gold Mines v. Calhoun Land & Mining Co., 83 Ga. 317 . … Rodgers v. Price, 105 Ga. 67 .

State v. Brown

154 Wash. 2d 787 · Washington Supreme Court · Aug 4, 2005

See State v. Brown, noted at 119 Wn. App. 1073 , 2004 WL 27207 , at * 4, 2004 Wash. App. LEXIS 10 , at *10-12. … Brown dated May 21, 2004. State v. Rankin was issued by this court on June 10, 2004.

Brown v. Battle

220 Miss. 530 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1954

Corley v. Hines, 203 Miss. 60 , 33 So. 2d 317 . … Appellee had an inspector for the State Plant Board make an inspection in June 1951 and that inspector testified that he found a heavy infestation of termites with considerable damage to the house.

Brown v. . Goodwin

75 N.Y. 409 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 10, 1878

(Williams v. Peyton, 4 Wheaton, 77 ; Mohan v. Davis, 4 McLean, 211 ; Jackson v. Shepard, 7 Cow., 88 .) Colman v. Shattuck ( 62 N. Y., 348 ), relied upon by appellant, is not in conflict with these views. … See Hilton v. Bender ( 69 N. Y., 75 ). We do not think it needful to examine any other grounds claimed by the respondents, why the plaintiff cannot maintain her action.

Hudson v. Brown

179 Wash. 32 · Washington Supreme Court · Sep 12, 1934

Brown and wife, defendants, was two thousand dollars; in the case of Northern Pacific Railway Co., plaintiff, v. Reese B. … Brown, defendant, was one hundred dollars; in the case of Reese B. Brown and wife, petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, respondent, was thirty-five thousand dollars; in the case of Sarah E.

Dobson v. Brown

225 Ga. 73 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jan 10, 1969

Holloway v. DeVane, 212 Ga. 182 ( 91 SE2d 350 ); Trust Investment &c. Co. v. City of Marietta, 216 Ga. 788 *76 ( 119 SE2d 568 ); Smith v. City of East Ellijay, 217 Ga. 364 ( 122 SE2d 112 ); Walker v. … In Roberts v.

Brown v. Commonwealth

788 S.W.2d 500 · Kentucky Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1990

In Thacker v. … Brown’s right was not compromised because Juror Smith maintained that he did in fact mention that he was employed by E.R.

Brown v. Eastburn

351 Pa. Super. 479 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 1986

Robinson v. Robinson, 505 Pa. 226 , 478 A.2d 800 (1984). We therefore affirm the trial court’s order. … Smith v. Smith, 307 Pa.Super. 544 , 453 A.2d 1020, 1025 (1982).

Richardson v. Brown

260 Mass. 509 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jul 1, 1927

Higgins, who was indebted to Arthur Brown, owned real estate in Middlesex County which, on March 27, 1922, he agreed to sell to Nellie A. Richardson. … Forbes v. Appleton, 5 Cush. 115 . Benson v. Monroe, 7 Cush. 125 , 131. Cook v. Boston, 9 Allen, 393 . See also Preston v. Boston, 12 Pick. 7 , 13.

Brown v. Truax

58 Or. 572 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 16, 1911

In Teel v. … It is urged that Brown stood by and permitted defendant to purchase the wood, and that thereby he is estopped from now claiming it, but no such estoppel is pleaded or proved.