Case law

Brown v. Bivings

277 P.2d 671 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 3, 1954

Webb v. Moran, 186 Okl. 140 , 96 P.2d 308 . … Catlett v. Jordan, 206 Okl. 473 , 244 P.2d 564 ; Staton v. Moody, 208 Okl. 372 , 256 P.2d 409 . Judgment reversed and cause remanded with directions to enter judgment for defendant. JOHNSON, V. C.

Brown v. Hunt

11 Mass. 45 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 15, 1814

Brown v. Hart

91 Conn. 667 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Jun 1, 1917

Brown v. Kincaid

1 Wright 37 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1832

[Common law mode of arbitration is in force in Ohio; State v. Jackson, 36 O. S. 281, 284.]

Glover v. Brown

148 So. 3d 185 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Aug 26, 2014

In re Brown, Terry et al.; Cintas Corporation; Discover Property & Casualty In *186 surance Company; — Defendant(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E.

State v. Brown

24 Conn. 316 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Feb 15, 1856

See State v. Arlin, 7 Foster (N. H.) R. 116. *320 We therefore advise the superior court to .render judgment against the defendant. In this opinion Hinman, J., concurred. Motion in arrest over-ruled.

Brown v. Butler

71 Conn. 576 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Mar 9, 1899

Todd v. Munson, 53 Conn. 579, 588 ; Foster v. Hall, 12 Pick. 89 .

Brown v. State

738 P.2d 1092 · Wyoming Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1987

In Goddard v. … THOMAS, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which BROWN, C.J., joins.

Brown v. Webb

60 Or. 526 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1912

Johnson v. Okerstrom, 70 Minn. 303, 308 ( 73 N. W. 147 ); Leavengood v. McGee, 50 Or. 233 ( 91 Pac. 453 ). Officers of Bank of Manchester v. Allen, 11 Vt. 303 , 306; 3 Enc. of Ev., p. 614; Methodist Church v. … Leavengood v. McGee, 50 Or. 283 ( 91 Pac. 453 ). See, also, Trustees v. Froislie, 37 Minn. 447 ( 35 N. W. 260 ); Society Perun v. Cleveland, 43 Ohio St. 481 ( 3 N. E. 357 ); Methodist Church v. Picket, 23 Barb. (N.

Brown v. Fraser

467 P.2d 464 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 24, 1970

Board of Adjustment of Oklahoma City et al. v. Shanbour (1967), Okl., 435 P.2d 569 ; Twist et al. v. Kay (1967), Okl., 434 P.2d 180 . In Van Meter et al. v. H. F. … Pierce from Ruling of Board of Adjustment of City of Tulsa (1959), Okl., 347 P.2d 790 , and Board of Adjustment of City of Oklahoma City et al. v.

Peterson v. Brown

17 Nev. 172 · Nevada Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1882

(Broughton v. Broughton, 4 Rich. S. C. 497.) The reason and policy of the law, in this respect, is well stated by Justice Green in Stark’s Ex.. v. … (Cushwa v. Cushwa, 5 Md. 52.)

Hudson v. Brown

179 Wash. 32 · Washington Supreme Court · Sep 12, 1934

Brown and wife, defendants, was two thousand dollars; in the case of Northern Pacific Railway Co., plaintiff, v. Reese B. … Brown, defendant, was one hundred dollars; in the case of Reese B. Brown and wife, petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, respondent, was thirty-five thousand dollars; in the case of Sarah E.

Brown v. Hughes

Supreme Court of Delaware · Apr 2, 2025

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MICHELLE BROWN,1 § § Petitioner Below, § No. 72, 2025 … LeGrow Justice 2 Julian v. State, 440 A.2d 990, 991 (Del. 1982). 3 Showell Poultry, Inc. v.

Brown v. Crandall

218 S.C. 124 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Oct 30, 1950

Wheeler v. Marchbanks, 32 S. C. 594, 10 S. E. 1011 ; Cohen v. Williams, 164 S. C. 499, 162 S. E. 758, 759 . … In Milford v.

Dobson v. Brown

225 Ga. 73 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jan 10, 1969

Holloway v. DeVane, 212 Ga. 182 ( 91 SE2d 350 ); Trust Investment &c. Co. v. City of Marietta, 216 Ga. 788 *76 ( 119 SE2d 568 ); Smith v. City of East Ellijay, 217 Ga. 364 ( 122 SE2d 112 ); Walker v. … In Roberts v.

Hicks v. Brown

38 Ark. 469 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 15, 1882

Brown v. State

100 Tex. Crim. 487 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 29, 1925

Walker v. State, 2 App. 326 ; Nolen v. State, 14 App. 474 ; Hanning v. State, 51 Texas Crim. Rep. 214 ; Layton v. State, 52 Texas Crim. Rep. 513 ; Robertson v. State, 54 Texas Crim. Rep. 21 ; Chism v. State, 159 S. … W. 1185 ; Murff v. State, 172 S. W. 247 ; Baggett v. State, 144 S. W. 1136 .

Vaughan v. Brown

81 Kan. 1 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Nov 6, 1909

This property was afterward sold by Brown at a constable’s sale to his codefendant, George Grover. … The defendants challenge in this court the jurisdiction of the district court to try the title to this property on appeal from the probate court, citing Hartwig v. Flynn, 79 Kan. 595 .

Whitmore v. Brown

147 Ark. 147 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 24, 1921

Brown for the lots in controversy, and thus disposed of any possible interest she might have in the lots. … Brown-was entitled to have his title quieted. Therefore, the decree must be affirmed.

State v. Brown

577 P.2d 135 · Utah Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1978

That evidence may not be admitted for such purposes, see State v. Dickson, 12 Utah 2d 8 , 361 P.2d 412 (1961). 3 . State v. Lopez, 22 Utah 2d 257 , 451 P.2d 772 (1969).