Case law

Cooley v. Brown

35 Iowa 475 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Dec 16, 1872

Pharo v. Johnson, 15 Iowa, 560 . Such *477 was the character of the pleading in this case, and there was, therefore, no error in overruling the motion. IV. It is next insisted that the judgment is excessive. … Brown and the defendant, concurred in by the makers of the note. As a part of this agreement, it was stipulated between Mrs. Brown and defendant that she should receive $200 of the proceeds of the new note.

Brown v. State

240 Ga. 274 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Nov 8, 1977

Phillips v. State, 237 Ga. 623 ( 229 SE2d 407 ) (1976). Additionally, Tuff consented to the search which produced the evidence. Herndon v. State, 138 Ga. … See United States v. Matlock, 415 U. S. 164 (1974); Welch v. State, 237 Ga. 665 ( 229 SE2d 390 ) (1976). 3. The victim positively identified the appellant as one of her attackers in a line-up and at the trial.

Brown v. Evans

149 Mich. 429 · Michigan Supreme Court · Sep 20, 1907

Brown. If you find from the evidence that Mrs. … Vinton v. Peck, 14 Mich. 292 ; People v. Hutchings, 137 Mich. 527 . 5.

Brown v. Keyser

53 Ind. 85 · Indiana Supreme Court · May 15, 1876

Waller v. . Brown

197 N.C. 508 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 9, 1929

Smith v. Smith, 173 N. C., 124 ; Robeson v. Moore, 168 N. C., 388 . It is the meaning given it by this Court in the construction of a deed. Edgerton v. Aycock, 123 N. C., 134 . … J., in Dupree v. Dupree, 45 N.

Brown v. Lyon

258 Iowa 1216 · Supreme Court of Iowa · May 3, 1966

Brown’s car, being in the second lane of traffic, and not being in the lane clearly marked for ‘Turn Lane,’ was [this] in anyway contributory negligence on her part?” … Ehrhardt v. Ruan Transport Corp., 245 Iowa 193, 202, 203 , 61 N.W.2d 696; Sprague v. Brodus, 245 Iowa 90, 93 , 60 N.W.2d 850 ; Bachelder v. Woodside, 233 Iowa 967, 974 , 9 N.W.2d 464, 467 ; Pinckney v.

Williams v. Brown.

127 N.C. 51 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 16, 1900

The attention of the Court was called to the case of Jones v. Britton, 102 N. C., 166 . The facts in the case before us do not make it necessary to review that case; but it will be observed that Jones v.

Brown v. Hanson

798 N.W.2d 422 · South Dakota Supreme Court · May 18, 2011

and SUSAN BROWN, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. … Table Steaks v.

Brown v. Haith

140 Neb. 717 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1942

Brown was not made a party defendant. … Certainly, Brown had a direct interest in that matter. There is no showing of a service of notice of the district court proceeding upon Brown.

Zogoplos v. Brown

84 N.H. 134 · Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Jun 27, 1929

Glines v. Smith, 48 N. H. 259, 273; Ordway v. Haynes, 50 N. H. 159, 165; Hoxie v. Walker, 75 N. H. 308, 313. … Company v. Bickford, 72 N.

Brown v. State

97 Ga. 215 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Mar 25, 1895

Jones v. The State, 90 Ga. 616 . :2. The newly discovered evidence was merely of an impeaching character, and the evidence introduced upon the trial was sufficient to warrant the conviction. Judgment affirmed.

Brown v. State

894 P.2d 597 · Wyoming Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1995

BACKGROUND The sordid details of Brown’s crimes were fully described by this court in his direct appeal so we need not reiterate them. Brown v. State, 817 P.2d 429 (Wyo.1991). … Fortin v. State, 622 P.2d 418, 420 (Wyo.1981).

Ten Stary Dom Partnership v. T. Brent Mauro (069079)

216 N.J. 16 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 5, 2013

A board’s decisions are presumptively valid, and a court may not substitute its own judgment for that of the board unless there has been a clear abuse of discretion by the board. Id. at 558; Davis Enters. v. … The party challenging the action of a planning board carries the burden of demonstrating that the board acted arbitrarily, capriciously, or unreasonably. Smart SMR of N.Y., Inc. v.

Palmer v. Brown

184 Md. 309 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jan 11, 1945

Co. v. Semmes, 73 Md. 9, 21 , 20 A. 127 , and Boyd v. Johnson, 145 Md. 385, 389, 390 , 125 A. 697 . In commenting on the case of Bull v. … Brown by Mr. Holloway there was attached to it a letter or memorandum which was also admitted in evidence, as being in the handwriting of the appellant himself, entitled “Complaint of M. H. Palmer v.

Miller v. Brown

115 Wash. 177 · Washington Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1921

Duncan v. Parker, 81 Wash. 340 , 142 Pac. 657 , L. R. A. 1915A 804; Godefroy v. Hupp, 93 Wash. 371 , 160 Pac. 1056 , Ann. Cas. 1918 E 494. … We held in Brownell v.

Brown v. Needles

186 Iowa 878 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Feb 18, 1919

Wilson v. Brown

320 Ark. 240 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 3, 1995

The Wilsons rely on Merriman v. Yutterman, supra, and Rose Lawn Cemetery Assoc., Inc. v. … Smith Gas Co. v. Gean, 186 Ark. 573 , 55 S.W.2d 63 (1932) and Field v. Morris, 88 Ark. 148 , 114 S.W. 306 (1908).

Stokes v. Brown

20 Or. 530 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1891

(Dodd v. Denny, 6 Or. 156 ; Henderson v. *534 Morris, 5 Or. 27 ; 1 Rumsey’s Prac. § 540; Catlin v. Gunter, 11 N. Y. 368 , 62 Am. Dec. 113 ; Place v. Minster, 65 N. Y. 89 ; Johnston H. Co. v. … Clark, 30 Minn. 308 ; Kopplekom v. Huffman, 12 Neb. 95 .)

State v. Brown

149 So. 3d 802 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Oct 3, 2014

In re Brown, James; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Ascension, 23rd Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 498181; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2014 KW 0479. Denied.

Barnes v. Brown

69 N.C. 439 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1873